4# Peace and War Flashcards

1
Q
  • What were the main patterns of suffrage extension (right to vote) in 19th C Europe?
A

a) The “revolutionary threat” hypothesis
b) The “political competition” hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Revolutionary threat

A
  • elite: better to give the right to people to vote then the revolution
  • relationship between income inequality and suffrage is an upside-down U-curve -> Suffrage was more likely to happen when inequality was moderate.
  • the hypothesis is explained only for male workers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why countries with high income didnt give the right to vote earlier?

A
  • more unequal a society is, the more resistant the elites are to granting voting rights because they would stand to lose more income.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Political competition hypothesis

A
  • right to vote and the process of democratization are influenced by the ** competition ** between different social classes.
  • The aristocracy wants weak parliament, the middle class wants strong parliament, the working class desires suffrage and a strong parliament.
  • Elites weaken middle-class position in parliament by extending suffrage and worker representatives through social reforms and restrictions on political freedoms.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pittaluga survival analysis

A
  • survey which examine the right to vote and parliamentary power.
  • right to vote was not solely driven by industrialization or income inequality but reflected strategic decisions made by elites in specific contexts
  • When the parliament was weak, elites introduced universal vote right to discourage the middle class from seeking more power.
  • This made the middle class a minority in parliament and reduced their incentive to push for greater parliamentary powers.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Germany extension

A

-1870s: Otto von Bismarck introduced a progressive franchise.

  • Bismarck created the Reichstag, a symbol of national unity but with a weak parliament.
  • 1871: Bismarck implemented universal male suffrage. Goal -> counter bourgeoisie demands for more parliamentary power.
  • Bismarck aimed to strengthen the conservative voice, particularly in rural areas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Relationship between suffrage extension and respect for civil
rights
and political freedoms and the development of welfare programs.

A
  • right to vote leads to new electorate and increased representation of workers in parliament -> growing pressures for social reform in parliament.
  • Elitist reaction involves weakening the electoral base of worker representatives.
  • Heavy restrictions are imposed on political rights and freedoms.
  • State-led social reform and welfare schemes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

example of the relationship

A
  • Napoleon III: large public works (first employment schemes)
  • Bismarck: right to retirement and sickness insurance (first real welfare state)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  • Pittaluga study: how elites can use the multiple dimensions of democracy (right to vote..) to remain in power
A
  • Early extension of suffrage is oftentimes evidence of parliamentary weaknesses
  • When suffrage was extended, often attempts to restrain political liberties or weaken the electoral base of socialist parties (by state-led welfare reform)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does it explain?

A
  • Why suffrage extension and strengthening of parliamentary autonomy rarely occurred at the same time
  • Why suffrage extension sometimes did not translate into genuine social reform
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Century of peace (La Belle Epoque)

A
  • Named in retrospect; contrasting the horrors of WWI; emphasizing joy of living
  • Period characterized by optimism, regional peace, economic prosperity, scientific, technological, industrial innovations, and social changes, flourishing of the arts
  • Warfare had been a way of life in Europe for centuries
    ->Napoleonic warfare and doctrines of “total war” (Von Clausewitz)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In contrast, period 1815-1914:

A
  • Only a small number of wars; limited impact & duration; involving only a handful of European wars
  • Mainly bilateral conflicts (e.g., wars of German and Italian unification)
  • Mainly outside the European continent/colonies
  • Estimate: 1815-1914 number of war deaths was 7 times less than in 18th C.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Congress of Vienna

A
  • 1815 Peace treaty
  • France + the great victors (Prussia, Russia, Austria and Britain)
  • Delegations from Sweden, Spain and Portugal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What congress of View aimed?

A
  • Restore international peace -> Create a new equilibrium among great European powers to prevent war
  • Restore domestic stability -> Instrumentalisation of monarchic dynasties: divine right to rule + family ties across Europe (mutual support)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  • Describe the factors conducive to the “Concert of Europe” politics.
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  • Count the factors conducive to the “Concert of Europe” politics.
A
  1. Recognition of international boundaries and state sovereignty
  2. Regulated war as instrument for peace
  3. Creation of equally powerful countries
  4. Compliance ensured by dual hegemony
17
Q

Describe each factor

A

1. Recognition of international boundaries and state sovereignty :
- Recognition of international boundaries (1815); multilateral agreements
- Earlier: @King’s death, all his international treaties had to be renewed; now a system of international rights is established

2. Regulated war as instrument for peace:
- Stakes of competition changed: Spheres of influence territorial enlargement)
- Mutual protection clause (against revolutions) + limitations on military interventions (1820)

4. Compliance ensured by dual hegemony:
1. Great Britain (“Pax Brittanica”): economic, military and colonial dominance; strong naval fleet
2. Russia: enormous land mass in the North and large population size (standing army); balancing British dominance via Holy Alliance

18
Q

Vienna system: what made it work?

A
  1. Fear of domestic revolutions — a willingness to work together
  2. End of British-French rivalry —- British hegemony
  3. Some states’ energy went to nation-building ( expansionism)
  4. Industrialisation —- new doctrines of imperialism and colonialism
19
Q

But why did the “European Concert” fail in the end?

A
  • Vienna system was essentially built on a negative conception of international relations
  • 40 years of peace; relative territorial stability
  • European powers divided over Troppau “mutual support” protocol
  • Seeds of nationalism: Vienna ignored nationalist sentiments and reduced Poland, Italy and German states to instruments for retaining status quo
20
Q

Details - causes

Vienna system was essentially built on a negative conception of internat

A

Vienna system was essentially built on a negative conception of international relations:
* A defensive system; aimed at preventing dominance from one state over others
- Although war became an instrument for peace, expansionist wars were not considered inevitable
- Throughout the 19th C., a constant military race; after 1900s, the speed of militarisation doubled (industrialisation)
- 1870s ”Great Depression”: weakened economies and industries; heightened colonial rivalries

  • Conflict management rather than genuine conflict resolution
21
Q

Causes- detail

* European powers divided over Troppau “mutual support” protocol

A
  • Holy Alliance in favour; to protect monarchistic regimes
  • France and Britain feared it would serve as an excuse for meddling in the internal affairs of independent states
22
Q

Causes- detail

* European powers divided over Troppau “mutual support” protocol

A
  • Holy Alliance in favour; to protect monarchistic regimes
  • France and Britain feared it would serve as an excuse for meddling in the internal affairs of independent states
23
Q

Causes - detail

* Seeds of nationalism

A

Vienna ignored nationalist sentiments and reduced Poland, Italy and German states to instruments for retaining status quo:
* Break up of Poland (partly annexed by Russia)
* Austria: tolerance towards nascent cultural and linguistic movements (Czechs and Magyars/Hungarians): seeds of later nationalist movements
* Italy: foreign rule (Austria) & weak German confederation
* No international body to which people could turn to revise boundaries

23
Q

Causes - detail

* Seeds of nationalism

A

Vienna ignored nationalist sentiments and reduced Poland, Italy and German states to instruments for retaining status quo:
* Break up of Poland (partly annexed by Russia)
* Austria: tolerance towards nascent cultural and linguistic movements (Czechs and Magyars/Hungarians): seeds of later nationalist movements
* Italy: foreign rule (Austria) & weak German confederation
* No international body to which people could turn to revise boundaries

24
Q

The break-down of European concert

1. Weakening of the Ottoman empire

A
  • Ottoman empire - sick man of europe because weakening of its political control and a decline in its economy.
  • millet system: , allowing each religious community to rule itself but remaining subordinate to Muslims
  • , allowing each religious community to rule itself but remaining subordinate to Muslims
25
Q

The break-down of European concert

Greek war of independence (1821-1830)

A
  • Sultan depended for regional control on Ali Pasha
  • Death of Ali Pasha (1822): Greek warlords filled the political vacuum: guerilla warfare
  • Sultan called in aid from Mehmet Ali, Pasha of Egypt
26
Q

The break-down of European concert

* The conflict became an international one

A
  • Russia = protector of Orthodox people in the Balkans, other powers feared Russian expansionist aspirations
  • Pro-Greek public opinion (Greece = birthplace of democracy)
  • Diplomacy broke off because of military presence Mehmet Ali
  • Battle of Navarino (1827): destruction of Turkish-Egyptian fleet
27
Q

The break-down of European concert

* Crimean War and alliance of Britain, France and Turkey against Russia

A
  • Crimean War (1853-56): largest European war since Napoleonic wars; and until WWI
  • An alliance of Britain, France and Turkey against Russia
  • 1853: Turkish-Russian war over Romania
    -1854: involvement France (and, then, Britain)
    -> French-Russian struggle over influence:
    • Russia: control over Palestinian territories (Holy Church) and Constantinople (birthplace Orthodox Christian Church)
    • France: Napoleon III: renewed relations with pope; challenged Russian protector rights of Christians in Ottoman Empire; pushed Sultan to recognise France as “sovereign authority” over the Christian population
28
Q

Crimean War (1853-56)

A