4 - Demand Flashcards
If people’s tastes, their income, and the price of other goods are held constant, what does a movement along the demand curve correspond to?
A change in price.
In chapter 3, we showed how to maximize utility subject to a budget constraint. How can we trace out the demand curves?
The demand functions would be in the form:
q1 = D1(p1,p2,Y)
q2 = D2(p1,p2,Y)
We can trace out the demand function for one good by varying its price while holding other prices and income constant.
For Perfect Complements give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
min(q1,q2)
Interior
q1 = Y/(p1+p2)
q2 = Y/(p1+p2)
For CES, ρ ≠ 0, ρ<1, σ = 1/(ρ-1) give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
(q1^ρ + q2^ρ)^(1/ρ)
Interior
q1 = (Yp1^σ) / (p1^(σ+1) + p2^(σ+1))
q2 = (Yp2^σ) / (p1^(σ+1) + p2^(σ+1))
For the Cobb-Douglas give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
q1^(α)q2^(1-α)
Interior
q1 = αY/p1
q2 = (1-α)Y/p2
For Perfect Substitutes where p1=p2=p give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
q1 + q2
Interior
q1+q2 = Y/p
For Perfect Substitutes where p1
q1 + q2
Corner
q1 = Y/p1
q2 = 0
For Perfect Substitutes where p1>p2 give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
q1 + q2
Corner
q1 = 0
q2 = Y/p2
For Quasillinear where Y > a^(2)p2/(4p1) give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
aq1^(0.5) + q2
Interior
q1 = (ap2/2pq)^2
q2 = Y/p2 - (a^(2)p2/4p1)
For Quasillinear where Y < a^(2)p2/(4p1) give the:
- Utility function
- Solution type
- Demand function for q1
- Demand function for q2
aq1^(0.5) + q2
Corner
q1 = Y/p1
q2 = 0
How can we derive the demand curve graphically?
If we increase the price of a product while holding other prices, the consumer’s tastes, and income constant we cause the consumer’s budget constraint to rotate, prompting the consumer to chose a new optimal bundle. This change in quantity demanded is the information we need to draw the demand curve.
How can we graphically visualize deriving the demand curve with two graphs one on top of the other, the top one a IC and BC graph between two goods, the bottom one a demand curve for the good on the x-axis of the previous graph.
- Panel a): q1 on x-axis, q2 on y-axis (held constant). The various budget constraints (which correspond to various p1’s) rotate inward as the price goes up, reaching lower indifference curves at each new, lower optimal bundle.
- Panel b): q1 on x-axis, p1 on y-axis. The downward sloping demand curve traces the q1 obtained from panel a) on the x-axis, with the corresponding p1.
In our graphical explanation of how we derive the demand curve, what does panel a) also show?
The price-consumption curve
What is the price-consumption curve?
The line through the optimal bundles that the consumer would consume at each price of q1, when p1 and Y are held constant.
What does the upward sloping nature of the price-consumption curve tell us?
Because the price-consumption curve tell is upward sloping, we know that the their consumption of both q1 and q2 will increase as the p1 falls.
Given our explanation for how to graph a demand curve, how can we use the same information in the price-consumption curve to draw a consumer’s demand curve, for q1?
Corresponding to each possible p1 on the vertical axis of panel b), we record on the horizontal axis the q1 demanded by the consumer from the price-consumption curve.
How does our explanation for how to graph a demand curve relate to the inverse relationship between price and utility?
We can use the relationship between the points in panel a and b in the explanation for how to graph a demand curve to show that consumer’s utility is higher at lower prices.
What is the effect of an increase in income, holding tastes and prices constant?
An increase in an individual’s income,holding tastes and prices constant, causes a shift of the demand curve. An increase in income causes a parallel shift of the budget constraint away from the origin, prompting a consumer to choose a new optimal bundle with more of some or all of the goods.
What are the 3 graphs we use to analyze a change in income? (The 3 graphs all have the quantity of the good on the x-axis.)
The 3 graphs all have the quantity of the good on the x-axis.
- The y-axis of the first graph is q2 and this graph has indifference curves and budget constraints (representing different income levels).
- The y-axis of the second graph is p1 and this graph is the demand curve.
- The y-axis of the third graph is Y and this graph represents the Engel curve
There are the 3 graphs we use to analyze a change in income? The y-axis of the first graph is q2 and this graph has indifference curves and budget constraints (representing different income levels). What do the various equilibriums represent or what are they called?
The income-consumption curve (or income-expansion path) show how consumption of q1 and q2 rise as income rises. As income goes up, consumption of both goods increases.
How can we show the relationship between the quantity demanded and income directly rather than by shifting demand curves to illustrate to illustrate the effect?
We can plot the Engel curve, which show the relationship between q1 and Y, holding prices constant, with q1 on the x-axis and Y on the y-axis.
How are income elasticities useful in analyzing how increases in income affect demand?
Income elasticities tell us how much the quantity demanded of a product changes as income increases. We can use income elasticities to summarize the shape of the Engel curve or the shape of thei ncome-consumption curve.
When is a good said to be an inferior good?
A good is called an inferior good is less of it is demanded as income rises: ξ<0.
When is a good said to be a normal good?
A good is called a normal good if more of it is demanded as income rises: ξ≥0.
When is a good said to be a luxury good?
A good is called a luxury good if the quantity demanded of a normal good rises more than in proportion to a person’s income: ξ>1.
When is a good said to be a necessity?
A good is called a necessity if the quantity demanded of a normal good rises less than or in proportion to a person’s income: 0≤ξ≤1.
What does the shape of the income-consumption curve tell us?
The sign of their income elasticities: whether the income elasticities for those goods are positive or negative.
The horizontal and vertical dotted lines through the original equilibrium quantities divide the new, outward-shifted budget line into three sections. Explain how the section where the new optimal bundle is located determines the consumer’s income elasticities of q1 and q2. Suppose that the consumer’s indifference curve is tangent to the new budget line at a point in the upper-left section (to the left of the vertical dotted line).
The consumer’s income-consumption curve, which goes from the original equilibrium q1 and q2 to the new equilibrium (upper-left), he buys more q2 and less q1 as his income rises, so q2 is a normal good (ξ≥0) for the consumer and q1 is an inferior good (ξ<0).
The horizontal and vertical dotted lines through the original equilibrium quantities divide the new, outward-shifted budget line into three sections. Explain how the section where the new optimal bundle is located determines the consumer’s income elasticities of q1 and q2. Suppose that the consumer’s indifference curve is tangent to the new budget line at a point in middle section (to the right of the vertical dotted line and above the horizontal lines).
The consumer’s income-consumption curve, which goes from the original equilibrium q1 and q2 to the new equilibrium (middle), is upward sloping, so he buys more of both q2 and q1 as his income rises, so q1 and q2 are normal goods (ξ≥0).
The horizontal and vertical dotted lines through the original equilibrium quantities divide the new, outward-shifted budget line into three sections. Explain how the section where the new optimal bundle is located determines the consumer’s income elasticities of q1 and q2. Suppose that the consumer’s indifference curve is tangent to the new budget line at a point in the lower-right section (to the right of the vertical dotted line and below the horizontal dotted line).
The consumer’s income-consumption curve, which goes from the original equilibrium q1 and q2 to the new equilibrium (middle), is downward-sloping, so he buys more q1 and less q2 as his income rises, so q1 is a normal good (ξ≥0) and q2 is an inferior good (ξ<0).
How does a consumer’s consumption ultimately react to an increase in income?
When a consumer’s income goes up, their budget constraint shifts outward. Depending on their tastes (the shape of the indifference curves), they may buy more q1 and less q2, less q1 and more q2, or more q1 and more q2. Therefore, either both goods are normal, or one good is normal and the other is inferior.
Why is it impossible for all goods to be inferior?
If both goods were inferior, the consumer would buy less of both goods as their income rises - which makes no sense. Were they to buy less of both, they would be buying a bundle that lies inside their original budget constraint. Even at their original, relatively low income, they could have purchased that bundle but chose not to.
We just argued using graphical and verbal reasoning that a consumer cannot view all goods as inferior. How can we derive the stronger result: The weighted sum of a consumer’s income elasticities equals one?
We start with:
p1q1 + p2q2 + … + pnqn = Y
By differentiating this equation with respect to income, we obtain:
p1dq1/dY + p2dq2/dY + … + pnqqn/dY = 1
Multiplying and dividing each term by qiY:
(p1q1/Y)(dq1/dY)(Y/q1) + (p1q1/Y)(dq1/dY)(Y/q1 + … + (pnqn/Y)(dqn/dY)(Y/qn) = 1
If we define the budget share of Good i as θi = piqi/Y and note that the income elasticities are ξi = (dqi/dY)(Y/qi), we can rewrite this expression to show that the weighted sum of the income elasticities equals one:
θ1ξ1 + θ2ξ2 + … + θnξn = 1
How can we use the weighted income elasticities formula θ1ξ1 + θ2ξ2 + … + θnξn = 1 to make predictions about income elasticities?
If we know the budget share of a good and a little bit about the income elasticities of some goods, we can calculate bounds on other, unknown income elasticities, which can be very useful to governments and firms.
Holding tastes, other prices, and income constant, an increase in a price of a good has which two effects on an individual’s demand?
- Substitution effect
- Income effect
What is the substitution effect?
The change in the quantity of a good that a consumer demands when the good’s price rises, holding other prices and the consumer’s utility constant. If the consumer’s utility is held constant as the price of the good increases, the consumer substitutes other goods that are now relatively cheaper for this now more expensive good.
What is the income effect?
The change in the quantity of a good that a consumer demands because of a change in income, holding prices constant. An increase in price reduces a consumer’s buying power, effectively reducing the consumer’s income or opportunity set and causing the consumer to buy less of at least some goods.
What is a doubling of the price of all goods the consumer buys equivalent to?
A drop in the consumer’s income to half its original level. Even a rise in the price of only one good reduces a consumer’s ability to buy the same amount of all goods previously purchased.
How do changes in product prices affect consumption?
When the price of a product rises, the total change in the quantity purchased is the sum of the substitution effect and the income effect
Describe how we should think about the substitution effect?
The substitution effect is the change in the quantity demanded from a compensated change in p1. which occurs when we increase the consumer’s income by enough to offset the rise in price so that their utility stays constant.
How can we determine the substitution effect from an increase in price?
To determine the substitution effect, we draw an imaginary budget constraint that is parallel to L2 (which is an inwardly rotated version of L1) and tangent to their original indifference curve I1. This imaginary budget constraint L* has the same slope as L2 because both curves are based on the new, higher p1.
How can we visualize the substitution effect graphically?
If p1 rises relative to p2 and we hold the consumer’s utility constant by raising their income to compensate them, their optimal bundle shifts from e1 to e*. The corresponding change in q1 is the substitution effect.