4. Confidentiality Flashcards
Duty of Confidentiality
Need candor for effective rep. Three doctrine: duty of confidentiality, attorney work product (procedural), privilege (procedural)
Attorney Client Priviledge? (Elements)
Anything said in confidence
+ relates to legal services (not business services etc. or anything general like the representation itself, fees, purpose, client wherabouts)
+ between privileged parties client/corporate employees, others (i) essential to legal services or (ii) necessary for support
+protected from discovery or testimony
+ unless waived
Deliberate? Tell 3rd party, even partial can cover all
Inadvertent? Prompt efforts to claw back/rectify
Work-Product Doctrine
Core (related to lawyer’s effort)
Prepared by lawyer or their agent
in anticipation of litigation
Not discoverable
Except: prosecution/investigation of lawyer for knowingly participating in fraud/crime
Confidentiality - duration?
From prospective conversations and beyond dealth
Confidentiality - what’s covered?
disclosure of ANY information obtained in rep (from client or otherwise), without client consent (not readily available in public domain)
Confidentiality - what’s covered?
disclosure of ANY information obtained in rep (from client or otherwise), without client consent (not readily available in public domain)
Exceptions to Attorney-Client Privilege
- disputes: joint clients or lawyer/client or estate
OR
- crime/fraud:
… communications in furtherance of crime (not past)
…knowing/reckless misrepresentation likely to injure
crime doesn’t need to have taken place, but client needed to have intent (CA: before communication)
person seeking to compel disclosure has burden (CA standard: show reasonable person would have reasonable basis to expect perpetration (or attempted perpetration) of crime/fraud
Exceptions to observing duty of confidentiality?
Perjury (mandatory) [CA: nope]
Consult and get client oral consent (follow up confirmation in writing) [CA: informed written consent]
Reasonably believe reasonable certainty of death/substantial bodily harm [CA: must be a CRIMINAL act - not the case under federal rules - and good faith effort to prevent and notify client before disclosure] CA scope: only to the extent necessary to prevent
Federal test extends to financial injury
Other miscellaneous excuses to disclosure of confidential information?
- establish claim or defense re: lawyer/client dispute
- legal advice re: rule violation
- pursuant to subpoena (court order)