3rd video Flashcards
Corruption example with ESG ratings? Credit…
Traditional credit rating agencies, like S&P and Moody’s they started issuing ESG ratings now, and now it appears that those companies that already had a credit rating, they receive abnormally high ESG ratings.
Because a firm is already paying them to issue credit ratings, so they have inclination to give them a high score.
Most important ESG rating providers? Rate the raters of 2020
MSCI (The only ESG ratings to which US ESG fund holdings are consistently related are those issued by MSCI), Refinitiv ESG, Sustainalytics (now Morningstar), S&P Global
are based on what investors said in surveys
Controlling for the MSCI ESG rating, the other ratings
* do not correlate significantly with ESG ownership
* do not explain any additional variation beyond what is explained by the MSCI ESG rating.
* Conclude that MSCI most important ESG rating for US ESG fund holdings.
How to read stars in the tables?
learn
What does t static means, which is showed in brackets in tables?
learn
What usually happens when MSCI downgrades/upgrades ESG ratings of companies (From AA to B, or from B to AAA)? 24 months after they… Slide: 19
Two years after downgrade, ESG ownership is on average 13.1% lower; two years after an upgrade, it is 17.1% higher.
It is gradual over time. Not immediate
Upgrade: opinion about ESG performance improves. They increase holdings in that fund.
ESG Ownership?
ESG Ownership: This typically refers to the proportion of a company’s shares that are held by investors who prioritize ESG criteria in their investment decisions. It can also reflect the degree to which a company is owned by ESG-focused funds or investors.
ESG combined score? (ESGC).20
Overlays the ESG score with ESG controversies to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the company’s sustainability impact and conduct over time.
ESG Score?.20
Measures the company’s ESG performance based on verifiable reported data in the public domain
Analysts collect firm-specific data on over 630 dimensions (ESG related data points) from a variety of sources…what are those sources 0.21
annual reports, company websites, NGO websites, stock exchange fillings, CSR reports, news sources
content research analysts collect this. really labor intensive task
Out of those 630 points, they choose 186 most important ones. They have to be most comparable and most financially material (relevant or significant).
(ESG) Self reporting data could be misleading because…
Firms can greenwash: self-report predominantly positive ESG information, pretend to care about ESG
What is greenwashing?
Greenwashing happens when organizations do the following: Make broad sustainability claims without evidence. Overstate their positive environmental effects in marketing materials. Advertise products as eco-friendly, but source raw materials from unsustainable suppliers
Refinitiv ESG rating range?
0-1
until 0.25 D, then C
from 0.5 is B
A is from 0.75
Best in class? is more to E, and S, and not G. Why not G? What is best in class?
For governance, it is better to benchmark against country peers,. There are different legal constrains in different countries.
Best in class is relative to their class. It can still be unsustainable company, for example oil, but if you are more sustainable than other oil companies, you will get an A.
How are ESG ratings typically constructed for MSCI?
Assesses companies’ management of financially relevant sustainability risks and opportunities along E S G. (financially relevant part is important!)
Might be similar ESG key issues which MSCI is tackling relative to Rifinitiv, but it is also different!
! MSCI evaluates ESG performance based on the firm’s: 2 things
a) exposure to risk (exposure score)
Example: company’s exposure to carbon emissions regulation
b) capability to manage risks (management score)
Example: ability to reduce and manage carbon emissions
Issue score = exposure + management score
Performance across all issues is aggregated into raw ESG score (‘absolute’)
-which is weighted based on MSCI’s view of the financial materiality of the different issues.
Scores go from 0-10