3.8 uses of computing Flashcards
cctv / recording in public - ethical
- are members of public happy with being recorded outdoors/indoors
- recording of adverts leading to unfair product placement
- can people use images/recordings maliciously
- inadvertently capturing copyrighted info
- crimes/emergencies caught on camera
- what areas appropriate to film
cctv / recording in public - legal
- permission to record certain places - laws in some areas may be more restrictive than others
- illegal to film people on their private land
- aspects of data protection legislation might apply
- inadvertently capturing copyrighted info, leading to legislation breach
- security of information storage
cctv / recording in public - cultural
- some cultural beliefs may not allow photography of people
- do people have right to request deletion of their images / recordings
driverless cars - moral
- who takes responsibility in the event of an accident? is it the developers?
- developing moral decisions in time of crisis - who does vehicle crash into
- perpetuating/increasing use of vehicles, negative impact on environment
- ability to keep passengers protected from hackers who might want to take over controls
- are passengers trustful enough of a driverless car
driverless cars - ethical
- taxi drivers out of business
- other similar businesses may follow suit in automated processes, more people out of jobs
- customers may be unaware vehicle is driverless
- if customer ill, taxi may not be able to deal with the situation
driverless cars - legal
- legal responsibility for accidents
- if videos/images taken during driving, privacy infringement
- passengers may find it easier to defraud / not pay taxi company
driverless cars - cultural
- some cultures may dislike assignation of human virtues on machines
- culture of the ‘cabbie’ may be damaged
- most accidents caused by driver error, use of driverless cars (in theory) improves safety. can public be persuaded of this?
legally bypassing restricted access of a device - ethical
- popo may see disturbing and traumatic images/messages
- may be seen as breach of privacy
- personal data (such as photos) may be lost
- popo may misuse device for their own purposes
- popo may use phone to contact (potential) victims + offer support
- popo may use phones to perform “stings” on other criminals
- slippery slope - will this lead to right to share encrypted / private data
- increased conflict between popo and public
- people may have private photos/data which, while legal, may go against their culture or cultural beliefs of the popo
legally bypassing restricted access of a device - legal
- popo may have to let people they believe to be guilty go free if they cannot access the data
- breach of (human rights of) privacy by accessing encrypted data
- popo may be able to use the data to solve other crimes / prevent further criminal activity
- popo may not keep data secure
- what level of authority / permission needed to access private data
- may be breaking the law if manufacturer / person refuses access
wearable tech (including camera) - moral / ethical
- unethical to collect data about people without them knowing what it is to be used for
- unethical to have people wear a device if they don’t have full understanding of it
- if device in testing, may not be as reliable as prev/other devices - system might fail / send incorrect data
- unethical use / observation of recordings
- unethical to have actions monitored in more detail than just essential life signs
- invasion of privacy
- who controls the data
- consider exactly what data recorded/stored
wearable tech (including camera) - legal
- data stored securely / in compliance with the data protection regulations
- who can view the data
- who is responsible if device goes wrong and someone dies
- what happens if illegal activity caught
- how long will data be stored / what happens if resident dies
- do others need to be told about camera
- who owns the data
wearable tech (including camera) - cultural
- videoing someone w/o their knowledge against cultural beliefs
- residents of opposite gender to staff may not want them viewing certain images/recordings
properties of a robot
- mechanical structure
- can sense environment
- can manipulate things
- can make coordinated movements
- some degree of intelligence
- programmable
computers will never be as intelligent as a human reasons
- lack emotion
- define intelligence
- no computer has passed turing test
- intelligence can only be bestowed by god
computers capable of being as intelligent as a human reasons
- mimic intelligent behaviour, like chess
- tech developing at fast pace
why is it difficult to catch and identify hackers
- criminals can be in other country (with different laws)
- use of dynamic IP address
- no physical evidence
- use of public computers / wi-fi
- people embarrassed to report they’ve been hacked
Data Protection Act 2018 principles
- lawfulness, fairness and transparency
- purpose limitation (only process personal data for purpose it was intended for)
- data minimisation (only gather and keep exact amount of data needed)
- accuracy (data should be accurate and truthful)
- storage limitation (don’t store data that is no longer needed)
- accountability (data processor responsible for complying with the GDPR)
- confidentiality
computer misuse act 1990
criminalises:
- unauthorised access to computer systems + data
- and the damaging or destroying of these
copyright, designs and patents act 1988
- gives the creator the exclusive right to their work
- this right can be sold or transferred
- protects the intellectual property of individuals
regulation of investigatory power act 2016
- allows use of investigatory powers by security agencies, law enforcement and other public authorities
- interception of comms, acquisition + retention of comms data
health and safety at work act
places a legal duty on employers to ensure the;
- health
- safety
- welfare of employees
- ensure that employees and others are kept safe
some extra cases
- lithium batteries (how they’re mined, disposed of)
- deepfakes
- machine learning (can machines make ethical decisions)