3.6 Vicarious liability Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is vicarious liability

A

Where a 3rd person has legal responsibility for the unlawful actions of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why are employers vicariously liable for the torts committed by employees, during the course of employment

A
  • employers more likely to be able to compensate
  • employees actions would be on behalf on employer
  • by employing the employee, employers creates possible risk
  • employer would be under some control of employee
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what are the 3 questions to ask in order to establish if theres vicarious liability?

A
  1. Was a tort committed
  2. Was the tortfeasor an employee
  3. When tort was committed, was the employee accting on behalf of employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What’s the test to see if a relationships other than employment can give rise to vicarious liability (example: independant contractors)

A
  • Harm wrongfully done by individual
  • as an integral part of business activity done by D and for its benefit
  • and in doing wrongful act, risk was created when assigning those individuals those activities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What case established this 3 point test

A

Cox v Ministry of justice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Facts of Cox v Ministry of Justice

A

D was kitchen worker in a prison who dropped a bag on C’s back causing injury. C seeked vicarious liabilty on ministry of justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Held in Cox v Ministry of justice

A

They were liable as his actions caused harm, activity was integral to D business, comission of wrongful act was created by D assigning him that role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Organisations can be liable to activities carried out on their behalf, true or false?

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What would an employer usually be liable for?

A
  • Wrongful acts authorised by employer
  • acts which are wrongful ways of doing something authorised by employer, even if forbidden by employer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When there is doubt about this, courts use ‘close connection test’, what is this test

A

examines closeness between work done and tortious conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the 2 points of the test

A
  1. What function or activity has the employer entrusted the employee to do
  2. Was there sufficient connection between position that employee was employed to do and wrongful conduct? If yes employer would be liable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Key case for this test

A

Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarket plc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Facts in Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarket plc

A

C went to as a worker at the kiosk a question and was verbally assaulted, when he left he then was physically assaulted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Held in Mohamud v WM Morrisons Supermarket plc

A

Employee was acting in cours of employment and therefore Morrisons supermarket were liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What can employers do to pay for compensation as a result of being found to have vicarious liability

A

Deduct wages from employee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does fault have to be proved in vicarious liability

A

No

17
Q

What is the threshold for vicarious liability

A
  • If person who committs is employed
  • and acting in course of employment
    If these are met, no further proof needed
18
Q

What are the 3 ways in which employers can be at fault

A
  1. Employer has chosen employee who could committ tort at work
  2. Training for the job was inadequate
  3. Employer should have supervised employee more