3.6 Social and welfare reforms: pressure and action, 1880-1914 Flashcards
Booth
Investigated the nature of poverty in London
Took around 17 years to complete his enquiry
Divided population into classes
Rowntree
Found that 10% of York was below the poverty line, he defined as primary poverty
Collected 3 surveys of York, provided a wealth of statistical data
Started general survey 1899, published in 1901
11,560 households visited, info maintained from 46,754 people
Fabien Society
Key members- Sidney and Beatrice Webb (authors, primarily on socialism)
They held meetings, published pamphlets and lobbied politicians
1906 lobbied for minimum wage
1911 lobbied for universal health service (so people would be able to sufficiently fir to defend Britain)
Boer war recruitment crisis
2/3 men rejected, potential recruits didn’t pass basic army examination
Recruitment crisis led to economic concerns: economic competition of USA and Germany, suggested that Britain had an inferior workforce
Military concerns: Empire depended on a fit and sufficient army
Fabian society (Boer war and the labour party)
Supported Boer war because small nations wouldn’t have a part in a world of empires
FS sent delegates to the Labour Party Foundation Conference
6 years later LRC sponsored candidates won seats in the election and set up as a set
separate party in Commons
Royal commission 1905-6
Set up by conservative government
Boer war (findings)
The Interdepartmental committee on Physical Deterioration 1903-4, found that the health of the population was deteriorating, concluded that the health of large sections of the urban population was undermined ur to poverty and negelect
Made 53 recommendations on how to improve personal hygiene and changing public health administration
National efficiency (referring to the Interdepartmental committee on Physical Deteriration)
The influence of the debate on national effciency: focused on the importance of human resources in terms of the economic and military field
(debate was sparked by the interdepartmental committee on Physical Deterioration)
Led to the making of social and economic policies and implementing them in ways the British competitors had done
Royal commission 1905-1909
Set up by conservative Gov for the enquiry into the the working of the Poor Laws and the best way to relieve the poor
The members were better qualified than those who participated in the Royal Commission in 1832-34
200 PL unions and 400 institutions took evidence from 450 witnesses and 900 statements were wittena nd analysed
Led to 2 contradicting reports in 1909
Royal commission majority report
the origins of poverty were basically moral
The Poor Law should remain the main vehicle for dealing with poverty
Board of guardians should be replaced by public assistant committees
There should be greater co-operation between charities and those administering the Poor Law, and voluntary aid committees should be set up to enable this to happen
Royal commission minority report
the origins of poverty were basically economic
a ministry of labour should be set up which would introduce and oversee public work schemes, set up a string of national labourer exchange to help the unemployed find jobs and organise a schedule of training schemes and set up detention colonies for those who were deliberately idle
the Poor Law administration should be broken up into education committees to deal with child poverty, pension committees (for elderly problems) and health problems (to deal with the poor who were sick or infirm)
Strengths and weaknesses if the majority and minority reports
strengths:
the work of the commission took over 4 years and the problem of poverty and its causes a high profile
put necessary pressure on the gov to come up with a solution
weaknesses:
the gov did not feel compelled to act on either set recommendations
those who favoured no change were greatly strengthened by the majority report, and the changes it recommended were overlooked
boards of guardians opposed the proposal that they should be dissolved, and their opposition was supported by the local government board
Liberal government 1906-1914 welfare reforms
Liberal gov elected 1906, it set about building new institutions that were completely operate form the Poor Law system
Old age pensions:
Canon William Blackley wrote an article in the 1878 where he proposed a compulsory contributory pension scheme
Developed by Charles Booth, who suggested tax funded pensions
By 1908 there was a general consensus was made that some form of pension scheme should be introduced and in 1909 the liberal govs proposal was put before parliament
Old age pensions Act 1909
Non-contributory and funded by taxes
Paid to men and women over 70
A single person received 5s a week and married couples 7s 6d, later raised to 10s
Full pensions were only paid to those with incomes of less than 8s a week
to qualify one had to be a British citizen and resident in Britain for 20 years
pensions were not paid to people who had continually failed to find work, who had been in prison in the last 10 years, who claimed poor relief in the past 2 years or who were drunkards
strengths:
those claiming pensions were around 600,000, roughly the same number as the elderly claiming poor relief before the Act
cost was roughly the same
for thousands the stigma of being a recipient of poor relief was gone and so was the fear of the workhouse
weaknesses:
this did not reduce the number of elderly people receiving relief in workhouses
Labour Exchanges Act 1909
By the beginning of the 20th century people came to realise that there were bound to be periods of trade depression
Winston Churchill’s principle advisor at the Board of Trades was William Beveridge, believed that workers needed support and help when they didn’t have it, he had a clear influence on the act. which aimed at the decasulisation of labour
Feb 1910, 83 labour exchanges were open and by 1914 there were 450 throughout england and wales
Was mostly successful (though some employers were worried that labour exchanges use the excuse that those who were unwilling to work, because they were ‘still looking’ and workers worried that labour exchanges would be used to recruit blackleg labour during a strike)
Churchill and Lloyd George decided to make labour exchanges voluntary, though unemployment insurance was was compulsory in certain trades