36-50 VARIETY

Question 1

This casual argument has a link and an impact

Answer 1

Disadvantage

Question 2

This argument uses definitions.

Answer 2

Topicality

Question 3

This argument sometimes links to the other teams language rather than their plan.

Answer 3

Critique/Deontological argument

Question 4

This argument must compete with the plan by either Net Benefits or Mutual Exclusivity.

Answer 4

Counter-Plan

Question 5

This argument is a procedural argument that attempts to call the affirmative team out for cheating.

Answer 5

Topicality

Question 6

This is NOT an off-case argument.

Answer 6

Affirmative Case

Question 7

“If you run with Scissors you will fall and stab yourself!”

Answer 7

Disadvantage

Question 8

This argument has a “violation” and “reason to prefer”

Answer 8

Topicality

Question 9

This argument is expected to cover the “stock issues” inherency, significance (harms), and solvency.

Answer 9

Affirmative case

Question 10

This argument measures the opportunity costs of a policy.

Answer 10

Counter-Plan

Question 11

“The European Union should handle cyber security INSTEAD of the US!”

Answer 11

Counter-Plan

Question 12

Negative teams that run these abandon the status quo and lose presumption.

Answer 12

Counter-Plan

Question 13

This must outweigh the affirmative significance to win.

Answer 13

Disadvantage

Question 14

A permutation tests the competition of these.

Answer 14

Counter-Plan

Question 15

This type of argument attacks the philosophical assumptions of the affirmative in some way.

Answer 15

Critique/Deontological argument