3.4.4 Oligopoly Flashcards
Characteristics of an oligopoly
- a few large firms dominate the market (can still be lots of firms in the industry)
- branded/differentiated products
- barriers to entry
- interdependence between competing firms
- uncertainty above how firms will behave
- supernormal profit in the long run
What is concentration ratio?
- reveals what percentage of the total market share a specific number of firms have
- concentration ratio is very high in an oligopoly
What does it mean if a concentration ratio gets more concentrated?
Bigger firms are increasing their market share
How do you show the concentration ratio?
number of firms: combined market share
How will the concentration ratio be influenced?
- barriers to entry in an industry = higher concentration ratio
- entering the industry is difficult due to existing dominance of relatively few firms = high start up costs
- leaving the industry is difficult due to the high level of sunk costs (costs that can’t be retrieved)
Examples of barriers to entry?
- high capital costs (costs of machinery)
- strong brand loyalty e.g. Nike or adidas
- sunk costs - e.g. advertising
- economies of scale - benefits of large scale production requires new entrants to have high start up costs
What is collusive behaviour?
- the collaboration of firms to increase prices together to a fixed amount, instead of being price competitive
- this is illegal
Reasons for collusion
- few firms/competitors —> makes it easier to collaborate on prices/output + to understand other competitors’ actions
- similar costs —> firms face identical costs being in the same industry = don’t have an incentive to trigger a price war which would decrease profit
- high barriers to entry —> makes it unlikely new entrants will emerge + disrupt
- brandy loyalty —> reduces incentive to be price competitive
What is non-collusive behaviour?
Firms are competing on price + non-price factors
What are the two types of collusion?
- overt = explicitly agree to limit competition or raise prices
- tacit = avoid formal agreements but closely montior each other’s behaviour (following the
lead of the largest firm)
What is an example of overt collusion?
- a cartel is the most restrictive form of collusion + is illegal in most countries
- the aim of a cartel is joint profit maximisation by fixing prices above what would be a competitive market price
- members have to keep output to agreed limit so not to exceed profit maximising output for the cartel
Consequences of overt collusion
- high prices for consumers
- less output in the market
- poor quality products and/or customer service
- less investment in innovation
How does overt collusion occur?
- price fixing = competitor agree a fixed price for all their competing products + usually higher then price equilibrium
- setting output quotas which limit supply + naturally rises prices
- agreements to block new firms from entering the industry
- agreement to pay suppliers the same price = driving down prices in the supply chain
Example of tacit collusion?
- price leadership
- firms may have an implicit understanding about each others pricing or output behaviour, without any direct communication or agreement
How does tacit collusion occur?
- when firms monitor the price of the largest firm in the industry + then adjust their prices to match
- it is difficult for regulators to prove that collusion has occurred
- similar consequences for consumers + benefits to firms as overt collusion but not to the same degree
What is game theory?
- considers how firms form a strategy on whether to collude or not in order to achieve an outcome that is to their benefit
- collision aims to achieve joint profit maximisation as it leads to the greater good rather than the pursuit of individual gain
How do firms use game theory?
- when making decisions to raise or lower prices
- when make decisions about new advertising + branding initiatives
- when making decisions about investment in product innovation
Game theory in an oligopoly
- firms may seek to joint profit maximise by price fixing
- this serves to reduce uncertainty as oligopoly is characterised by uncertainty + interdependence = the behaviour of one firm affects the other
When is collusion more likely?
- the managers of the firms trust one another = don’t think one will cheat
- there is less chance being caught by competition authorities (CMA)
- firms have similar cost structure - so there is no point competing on price
- high barriers to entry = new firms can’t enter + undercut
Explain a game theory grid
- if both firms agree to collude, they are better offer in terms of joint profit maximisation (top left corner)
- however, if one cheats (sets a lower price) + the other doesn’t = the cheater benefits (top right + bottom left MUST BE MIRRORED)
- if they both cheat = they are both worse off than if they collude (bottom right)
Why is there an incentive to cheat in collusion?
- because collusion is tacit since it’s illegal in the UK
- this means there is no written down contract
- if a firm cheats they will gain greater profits then if they colluded
- however, if the other firm follows by lowering the price (both cheat), both firms end up worse off compared to collusion
Disadvantages of collusion
- one firms may act as a whistleblower = inform the regulatory of collusion
- whistleblowers get a lower penalty
- those found guilty may be fined + suffer damage to reputation
Why might cartels collapse?
- incentive for firms to increase output beyond agreed limit = increases firms individual profit
- game theory = incentive to cheat to steal profits
- firms are most likely to cheat if it is less likely they will get caught
What are the types of price competition?
- price wars
- predatory pricing
- limit pricing