3.4 Market structures (perfect and monopolistic competition and monopoly) Flashcards
Perfect competition
Market where there is a high degree of competition (no market is completely perfectly competitive)
Perfect competition characteristics
Homogenous (identical) goods/Price takers: buyers and sellers not big enough/no ability to influence the price
Information: perfect information for buyers and sellers
Number of firms: infinite buyers and sellers
Barriers to entry/exit: low
Firms are profit maximisers: will produce where MC=MR
Short-run and Long-run equilibrium in perfect competition
Short-run: When supernormal and subnormal profit is being made
Long-run: When normal profit is being made
Short-run profit maximising equilibrium (perfectly competitive market)
Firms can make supernormal profits.
The firm is a price taker, and it accepts the industry price of P1 and produces an output of Q1.
- The rectangle shows the area of supernormal
profits earned. It is assumed that firms are short run profit maximisers.
Long-run profit maximising equilibrium (perfectly competitive market)
Only normal profits are made as profits are competed away.
The supernormal profits made by existing firms means new firms have an incentive to enter
the industry. Since there are no barriers to entry, new firms are able to enter.
- This causes the supply in the market to increase, supply curve shifts from S1 to S2. The price level in the market falls as a consequence; firms are price takers, they must accept this new, lower price.
Competitive pressure ensures equilibrium is established. The supernormal profits have been competed away, so firms only make normal profits.
The new equilibrium at P=MC means firms produce at the new output of Q2 in the long run.
Advantages of a perfectly competitive market
- In the long run, there is a lower price. P=MC, so there is allocative efficiency
- Since firms produce at the bottom of the AC curve, there is a productive efficiency
- The supernormal profits produced in the short-run might increase dynamic efficiency through investment
Disadvantages of a perfectly competitive market
- In the long run, dynamic efficiency
might be limited due to the lack of supernormal profits. - Since firms are small, there are few or no economies of scale.
- The assumptions of the model rarely apply in real life. In reality: branding, product differentiation, adverts and positive and negative externalities,
mean competition is imperfect.
Monopolistic competition characteristics
- Imperfect competition: firms are short-run profit maximisers
- Product differentiation: non-homogenous goods/services due to branding; XED is high
- Large number of buyers and sellers: relatively small and independent, each seller has the same degree of market power as other sellers, but it’s relatively weak.
- No barriers to entry/exit
- Imperfect information
Examples: monopolistic competition includes hairdressers and regional plumbers.
Short-run profit maximising equilibrium (monopolistically competitive market)
Firms profit maximise at the point MC = MR. The area P1ABC1 shows the supernormal profits that firms earn in the short run.
Long-run profit maximising equilibrium (monopolistically competitive market)
New firms enter the market since they are attracted by the profits existing firms are making, making the demand for the existing firms’ products more price elastic which shifts the AR curve (demand curve) to the left. Consequently, only normal profits can
be made in the long-run and the equilibrium point is P1Q1.
How can firms try and stay in the short-run?
By differentiating their products and innovating.
Advantages of a monopolistically competitive market
- This will shift SRAS to the left (SRAS1 to SRAS2).
- Since firms do not fully exploit their
factors, there is excess capacity in the
market. This makes firms productively
inefficient (also note: the firm does
not operate at the bottom of the AC
curve). This is in both the short run
and long run - Consumers get a wide variety of
choice. - The model of monopolistic
competition is more realistic than
perfect competition - The supernormal profits produced in
the short run might increase dynamic
efficiency through investment
Disadvantages of a monopolistically competitive market
- In the long run dynamic efficiency might be limited due to the lack of supernormal profits.
- Firms are not as efficient as those in a
perfectly competitive market, they have x-inefficiency, since they
have little incentive to minimise their costs.
Monopolies characteristics
- Profit maximisation. A monopolist earns supernormal profits in both the short run and the long run.
- Sole seller in a market (a pure monopoly)
- High barriers to entry
- Price maker
- Price discrimination
Monopoly power vs Pure Monopolies
When one firm dominates the market with more than 25% market share, the firm has monopoly power e.g. Google dominates the search engine market, with 90% share.
Monopoly power can be gained when there are multiple suppliers. If two large firms in an oligopoly (several large sellers) have greater than 25% market share, they are said to have
monopoly power e.g. Sainsbury’s and Asda have more than 25% market share combined, so they are said to have monopoly power.
- There are very few examples of pure monopolies, but several firms have monopoly power.
Monopoly powers influence: Barriers to entry
The higher the barriers to entry, the easier it is for firms to maintain
monopoly power.
Examples of barriers to entry which can maintain monopoly power
- Economies of scale: As firms grow larger, the average cost of production falls meaning existing large firms have a cost advantage over new entrants to the market, maintaining their monopoly power: it deters new firms from entering the market because they’re not able to compete with
existing firms. - Limit pricing: This involves the existing firm setting the price of their good below the
production costs of new entrants, to make sure new firms cannot enter profitably. - Owning a resource: Early entrants to a market can establish their monopoly power
by gaining control of a resource e.g. BT owns the network of cables so new firms would find it very difficult to enter the market. - Sunk costs: If unrecoverable costs, e.g. advertising, are high in an industry, new firms will be deterred from entering the market, because if they’re unable to compete, they do not get the value of the costs back.
- Brand loyalty: can be increased with
advertising, it’s difficult for new firms to gain market share - Set-up costs: If it is expensive to establish the firm, then new firms will be unlikely to
enter the market.
-
- The number of competitors: The fewer the number of firms, the lower the barriers to entry,
and the harder it is to gain a large market share. - Advertising: Advertising can increase consumer loyalty, making demand price inelastic, and
creating a barrier to entry. - The degree of product differentiation: The more the product can be differentiated, through
quality, pricing and branding, the easier it is to gain market share. This is because the more
unique the product seems, the fewer competitors the firm faces.
Profit maximising equilibrium
A monopolist earns supernormal profits in both the short run and the long run. This is at the point MC = MR, so the monopolist produces an output of Q1 at a price of P1.
- The shaded rectangle (AR and AC from Q1 to P1 and subsequent P2) shows the area of supernormal profits.
Monopoly characteristics on graph
Since the firm is the sole supplier in the market, the firm’s cost and revenue curve is the same as
the industry’s cost and revenue curve. Firms are price makers in a monopoly.
P>MC in the diagram, due to profit maximisation which occurs at MC = MR, so there is allocative
inefficiency in a monopoly.
AR > AC, so there are supernormal profits.
Price discrimination
Price discrimination occurs in a monopoly, when the monopolist decides to charge different groups of consumers different prices for the same good/ service. This is not for cost reasons.
Third degree price discrimination
When different groups of consumers are charged a different price for the same good or service e.g. the higher price at peak times on
trains is a form of third degree price discrimination, because generally, a different group of consumers (usually commuters) use trains at peak times, than off-peak times. Similarly, adults, students and children pay different prices to see the same film at a cinema. It costs
the cinema the same to show the film, but the consumers have been divided into groups
based on age.
Costs of third degree price discrimination to consumers
- Usually, price
discrimination results in a loss of consumer surplus. Since P > MC, there is a loss of allocative efficiency. - It strengthens the
monopoly power of firms, which could result in higher
prices in the long run for
consumers.
Costs of third degree price discrimination to producers
- If it is used as a predatory pricing method, the firm could face investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority.
It might cost the firm to
divide the market, which
limits the benefits they
could gain.