3.4 Market Structures Flashcards
What is economic efficiency ?
- making optimal use of scarce resources to help satisfy changing wants & needs ➡️ how well a market system allocates scarce resources to satisfy consumers
What is allocative efficiency ?
- occurs when the value that consumers place on a good/service (reflected in the price they are willing and able to pay) = the cost of the factor resources used up in production
- AR = MC ➡️ ie. demand = supply
- social efficiency is the same (MSB = MSC)
What is productive efficiency ?
- occurs when firms max production while minimising costs ➡️ exploits all economies of scale
- min point on AC curve (AC = MC) in SR
- at minimum efficient scale in LR
What is dynamic efficiency ?
- when businesses supplying a market successfully meets changing needs & wants over time ➡️ linked to innovation/invention
- occurs when supernormal profits are reinvested ➡️ lower unit costs (AC curve shift downwards)
What is innovation ?
- putting new ideas into action ➡️ ‘the commercially successful exploitation of ideas’
- product innovation: small scale & subtle changes to the characteristics and performance of a good/service
- process innovation: changes to the way in which production takes place or is organised + changes in business models & pricing strategies
What is X-inefficiency ?
- occurs when firms are being wasteful for lower costs ➡️ any point on AC curve
- when a lack of real competition may give a monopolist a weak incentive to invest in new ideas or consider consumer welfare ➡️ AC higher
What is deadweight loss of welfare ?
- the loss in producer & consumer surplus due to an inefficient level of production maybe resulting from one or more market failures or govt failure
What is pareto optimality ?
- where it is not possible for households or firms to bargain or trade in such a way that everyone is at least as well off as the were before and at least one person is better off
- exists if there is both allocative efficiency & productive efficiency
Allocative efficient ?
✅ perfect competition
❌ monopolistic
❌ oligopolistic
❌ monopoly
Productive efficient ?
✅ perfect competition
❌ monopolistic ➡️ profit max instead
❌ oligopolistic ➡️ profit max instead
❌ monopoly ➡️ profit max instead
Dynamic efficient ?
✅❌ perfect competition ➡️ LR no but SR possibly
✅❌ monopolistic ➡️ LR no but SR possibly
✅ oligopolistic - make profit but may not reinvest
✅ monopoly - make profit but may not reinvest
X-inefficient ?
❌ perfect competition - probably x-efficient
✅ ❌ monopolistic
✅ oligopolistic (less than a monopoly)
✅ monopoly
What is perfect competition ?
- market structure whose assumptions are strong, therefore unlikely to exist in the
vast majority of real-world markets - however take some insights from studying a world of perfect competition + comparing & contrasting w/imperfectly competitive markets & industries
- eg. small bakeries in a large city, small scale wheat rowers, sporting bets, fruit seller in a big street market
Characteristics of perfect competition ?
- many sellers + buyers
- identical costs
- identical/homogenous products
- no entry/exit barriers
- perfect knowledge of the market for all participants (same access to info)
- firms are price takers ➡️ as there are many firms producing identical products therefore consumers can easily switch from one firm to another
- normal profits for all firms in the LR (but SR losses or supernormal profits are possible)
- all firms have access to same quality factors of production
- profit maximisation is assumed as key objective of firms + consumers are assumed to be utility maximisers when making their purchasing decisions
Profit maximisation in LR (perfect competition) ?
- produce at the quantity where MR = MC
- LR profit diminished as firms enter the market due to having perfect knowledge & firms making supernormal profits in the SR (profit motive)
- causes an outward shift in supply, forcing down the ruling market price until price = LRAC
- at this point all firms are making normal profits where price (AR) = AC
- other things remaining the same, there is no further incentive for movement of firms in & out of the industry and a LR equilibrium is established where price = AC at output where MR=MC
When may a firm consider shutting down production (PC) ?
- in the SR, a business will continue to supply products as long as their revenues at least cover variable costs ie. revenue = AR x Q
- VC are costs that vary directly w/output eg. raw
materials, component parts & employees paid an hourly wage - providing that price per unit (AR) > average variable cost (AVC), then a contribution is being made to cover some fixed (overhead) cost
- as a result the firm would be better off continuing production if we assume that FC are lost if a shutdown decision is made
- but, if there is a fall in demand & price drops below AVC, then a firm might decide to shutdown production to minimise their losses
- this is because not enough revenue is being generated & total losses suffered would be
higher if production continued
LR equilibrium in PC ?
- in LR equilibrium, all firms are making normal profits ➡️ Price (AR=AC) ie. breakeven
- firms making sub-normal profits are likely to leave the industry ➡️ causes an inward shift of supply which leads to a rise in the market equilibrium price. In the LR the net exit of firms will allow the remain firms to earn normal profits where price = AC
Economic efficiency in PC ?
- ✅ allocative efficiency: both in SR & LR, P = MC
- ✅ productive efficiency: attained in LR, output is at lowest point of AC
- ❌ dynamic efficiency: LR no as lack of supernormal profits but SR possibly + little space for innovation
- ❌ x-inefficient: producing at lowest point of ACC therefore x-efficient
Why are competitive markets good for economic efficiency ?
- lower prices: (due to many competing firms), XED will be high ➡️ consumers prepared to switch their demand to the most competitively priced products
- low barriers to entry: entry of new firms provides competition + ensures prices are kept low
- lower total profits & profit margins than in monopoly
- greater entrepreneurial activity: for competition to be improved & sustained there needs to be a genuine desire on behalf of entrepreneurs to innovate & invent to drive markets
- competition ensures that firms move towards productive efficiency & avoid x-inefficiency
- threat of competition should lead to a faster rate of technological diffusion, as firms must be responsive to changing needs of consumers ie. dynamic efficiency
Evaluating assumptions of PC model
- most firms have so amount of price setting power - they are price makers not price takers!
- dominance in real world markets of differentiated/branded products
- highly complex products, there always info gaps facing consumers
- impossible to avoid search costs even with the spread of digital/web technology
- patents, control of intellectual property, control of key inputs are all ignored by the PC model
- rare for entry/exit in an industry to be costless
- PC model assumes that there are no externalities (positive/negative) in reality,
there are often 3rd party effects of every market
Pros & cons of PC market structures ?
- points made in relation to efficiency & unrealistic underlying assumptions (diff flash cards)
- ✅ consumers are not exploited by firms, in terms of high prices
- ✅ equality – products are the same regardless of where they are bought (all consumers are able to buy the same product)
- ✅ no ‘wasted’ costs in terms of advertising etc
- ❌ consumers face a lack of choice & cannot necessarily find a product that perfectly meets their needs
- ❌ firms are unlikely to be able to grow large enough to benefit from economies of scale
What is monopolistic competition ?
- a form of imperfect competition + can be found in many real-world markets eg. sandwich bars, coffee stores, pizza delivery businesses, hairdressers
- similar to PC but regarded as more realistic as products are differentiated (businesses have some control over their products + implies that firms have some price setting power ie. AR curve slops downwards)
Characteristics of monopolistic competition ?
- imperfect competition
- large no. of buyers & sellers ➡️ industry concentration ratio is low
- perfect info
- low barriers to entry/exit - allows firms to respond to profit signals
- selling similar/differentiated products
- firms have a little price making power over their own brand
- firms aim to maximise profit + consumers aim to maximise utility
- economic profit/loss can be achieved in SR
- normal profits achieved in LR
- productively & allocatively inefficient
Profit maximisation in LR (MC)
- no barriers to entry/exit therefore new firms are attracted by the SR economic profit and enter the market
- this reduces demand for the original firm
- demand falls, price falls & the curve becomes slightly more elastic
- only normal profits can be made in LR equilibrium ie. AR = AC