3.2.3 Improving adherence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Improving adherence

Ley (1988) argued that patients are…?

Rather than…?

A

‘Information seekers’ = they want to know as much about their disorders and any subsequent treatment as possible, rather than being ‘information blunters’ who wanted to be kept from the truth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

What are techniques suggested by the behaviourist apprach that we could use to improve adherence?

A
  • Feedback and self-monitoring
  • Contigency contracts
  • Modelling
  • Direct reinforcements/incentives
  • Punishment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

Feedback and self-monitoring

A

The patients gets regular reports on the state of their health so reinforcing their adherence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

Contingency contracts

A

The patient negotiates a contract with a health worker concerning goals and rewards for achieving their goals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

Modelling

A

The patient sees someone else who is successful in a support group or as a mentor etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

Direct reinforcements/incentives

A

Like being given more money to continue on a programme or come off drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Using the behaviourist approach to improve adherence

Punishment

A

Take medication or face compulsory admission to hospital, for example.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Customising treatments

A

Adapting the course of treatment to suit the patient’s lifestyle.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Evidence to support customising treatments

A

Shi (2007) simplifying dosage frequency can improve adherence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Contracts

A

Can be discussed between the Dr and patients and then signed or kept to a verbal agreement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Evidence to support contracts

A

Bosh-Capblanch et al. (2007) carried out a review of previous studies (meta-analysis) and found that the use of contracts did generally increase adherence, but little evidence of long-term improvement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Prompts

A

Reminders through texts, emails, phone calls, medication boxes etc.

May help when the key cause of non-adherence is forgetting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Individual behavioural techniques

Evidence to support prompts

A

Strandbygaard found that prompts did improve adherence to medication in asthma sufferers, but other evidence is inconclusive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Aim

A

To compare the adherence of children with asthma using the Funhaler to those using the traditional spacer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Funhaler

A

Same as standard asthma inhaler, except the spacer has the addition of a whistle and toy element, aiming to make it more fun for children to use.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Method

A

Field experiment

17
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Participants

A
  • 32 children aged 1.5 to 6 years-old
  • Had asthma
  • Used a standard spacer
18
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Sampling method

A

Randomly recruited through 7 local clinics.

19
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

What were parents asked to complete?

A

A questionnaire including closed questions about attitudes and adherence to the recommended treatment.

20
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

What were children instructed to do?

A

Use the Funhaler for 2 weeks and complete the initial questionnaire again.

21
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

How were parents contacted? What were they asked?

A

By telephone on an ad hoc basis whilst their child was using the standard treatment and the Funhaler, to be asked if their child had taken their treatment on the previous day.

22
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Results

A

Yes.

59% of children on their standard treatment had been medicated the previous day, this rose to 81% using the Funhaler.

23
Q

Chaney et al. (2004)

Conclusion

A

The Funhaler is effective in increasing adherence to asthma treatment in children.

24
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Immunisation deficient

A

Children who were found to be in need of at least one immunisation.

25
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Community interventions

A

Any attempts to encourage a certain behaviour in a town or city, using methods such as leafleting, letters and lotteries.

26
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Aim

A

To investigate the impact of 4 conditions on motivating parents to have their children immunised.

27
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

What were the 4 conditions?

A
  1. Mailed prompt
  2. Mailed specific prompt
  3. Mailed specific prompt plus expanded clinic hours and convenience.
  4. Mailed specific prompt plus lotter ticket (monetary incentive).
28
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Participants

A
  • 2,101 pre-school immune-deficient children in America.
  • 50% female
  • 64% white
  • Needed one or more innoculations for tetanus, whooping cough, measles, mumps, rubella, polio or diphtheria.

FINAL SAMPLE 715?

29
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Method

A

Longitudinal field experiment.

30
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Which group had the biggest impact?

A

The monetary incentive group.

Followed by increased access group, specific prompt group, general prompt group and lastly the control groups.

31
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Which groups caused a 29% increase in the no. of immunisations given?

A

Specific prompt and monetary incentive methods.

32
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Which method was the most cost-effective?

Which was the least?

A

Specific prompt group was the most cost-effective.

Monetary incentive was the least cost effective in the long run.

33
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Conclusion

A
  • Using behavioural incentives to motivate parents to immunise children is effective.
  • A single general prompt is not enough to motivate parents to immunise children.
34
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Strengths

A
  • Standardised procedure = high reliability because research it replicable.
  • Generalisable = large-scale study on huge population of immune-deficient children, providing lots of data.
  • Longitudinal study = increases validity since we can learn long-term effects.
  • RWA = could help influence approaches used by health care providers to improve immunisation rates.
35
Q

YOKLEY AND GLENWICK (1984)

Criticisms

A
  • Cultural bias = findings may not generalise to other parts of the USA or other countries. The final sample was smaller so also may not represent the target population.
  • Unethical = used children, parents did not consent to participate, they were unaware their behaviour was being manipulated, questionable whether it is ethical to encourage a group using money.
36
Q

Issues and debates

How does Yokley and Glenwick’s study have RWA?

A

Suggests ways that adherence could be improved in immunisation-deficient children.

37
Q

Issues and debates

What is it reductionist to assume about adherence?

A

That non-adherence is as simple as making a rational choice.

The reason for adherence may be a complex interaction between past positive or negative experiences (behaviourism) and early trauma (psychodynamic) combined with biological side effects which may be very individual to one particular person.