3.2.1.2 Preparation and training methods in relation to maintaining physical activity and performance Flashcards
examples of fitness tests
- stork test
- sergeant jump
- standing broad jump
- sit and reach
- bleep
- 5-10-5 agility test
- 10m sprint 30m sprint
- lactate threshold
- Illinois agility test
- hand grip
quantitative data
data in form of numerical value
e.g. HR monitor
compare to national av
tables, bar charts, line graphs and pie charts
qualitative data
data descriptive in nature (feelings, emotions opinions)
subjective quality of performance rather than quantity
e.g. Borg Scale
objective data
measurable and involves facts
FACT
maximal fitness test e.g. VO2 max test
subjective data
open to interpretation involving opinions and beliefs
OPINION
e.g. submaximal test e.g. harvard step test
reliability
whether or not test to be repeated in exact same conditions (results exact same)
concerned with consistency and repeatability of test results
validity
measure what supposed to measure sport specific
e. g. sit and reach -> flexibility back & hamstrings
e. g. actions same/muscles used in same way as they are in performer activity
borg scale
rating of perceived exertion (RPE)
qualitative
physical feelings/sensations experienced by performer
e.g. sweating muscle fatigue, respiratory and HR
adv: quick & easy to report, no equipment
4 factors that reliability is affected by
- sub maximal tests more reliable (no motivation),
- maximal tests = perform at max intensity
- testing environment same each time
- testing protocol & personnel must be standardised
6 reasons/benefits of fitness testing
- strengths/weaknesses
- progress
- motivation
- design training programme
- talent ID
- goals
maximal tests
working to exhaustion
-ve: difficult ensure working at max = over exertion/injury
sub maximal test
4 factors affecting sub maximal reliability:
predict max work capacity (reliability)
motivation = not important in sub maximal long as
1. equipment standardised
2. tester experienced
3. protocol followed exactly
4. test repeated few times = avoid human error
direct tests
laboratory
measure values directly
most accurate but expensive
indirect tests
predict fitness
less accurate but cheaper
SPORR
specificity
progressive overload
reversibility
recovery
FITT
frequency (no of times trains/ regime)
intensity (hard working= aerobic/anaerobic)
time (duration)
type (what exercise, similar to sport = effective)
(way of applying progressive overload)
specificity
training & improvements
ensure: focus, purpose, well planned (skills involved)
identify and address weakness
train relevant muscles energy systems(sport/individual)
fibre types= components of fitness
progressive overload
training progresses = improvements, env demand…
component of fitness improve, skill not plateau
(intensity/duration)
progression & overload
progression: body adapts to training, increase demand for improvement
%HR, %1RM duration frequency
overload: training taxing, demand greater than usual
FITT, duration, HR - gauge hard working appropriate % of HR max/1RM
reversibility
adequate rest/recovery = prevent injury
fun recovery important reversibility = improvements lost, demand env decrease, components of fitness decrease, skills deteriorate
important limit no of days off = reversibility
recovery
plan, training/rest days
injury risk reduced, athlete not exhausted, recover energy systems, remove LA, feedback, DOMS
DOMS
caused by micro tears in muscle tissue