3212- global systems Flashcards
globalisation causes
interdependence (they rely on each other)
how does globalisation cause economic interdependence?
- countries rely on each other for economic growth e.g. oil is produced by one group of countries and consumed by another group of countries. Consumers rely on producers to sell them oil, while producers rely on the money the consumers give them when they buy oil
how does globalisation cause political interdependence?
- countries are dependent on each each other to solve issues that cannot be addressed by just one country e.g. in 2015-16 European migrant crisis, the countries of Europe had to work together to support refugees from conflict in Syria
how does globalisation cause social interdependence?
- greater connections between people living in different countries creates social interdependence between countries- migrants for example build new relationships and become interdependent with people of other countries
how does globalisation cause environmental interdependence?
- every country in the world is dependent on the rest of the world to look after the environment e.g. in 1980s a reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear plant in Ukraine- radiation from the explosion lead to cancers and birth defects in Ukraine, Russia and Belarus
interdependence creates inequality, both between countries and
between people within the same country
interdependence tends to bring more benefits such as increased wealth and more power to developed countries rather than less developed countries and to richer rather than poorer people-why?
due to unequal flows of people, money, ideas and technology
explain idea of unequal flows of people
- people tend to move from areas where there are few jobs (normally less developed countries) to countries with plenty of jobs (normally developed countries)
- people also leave countries to escape war, famine or persecution; these refugees often try to get to the nearest safe country
- the people who move for economic reasons are not usually the poorest in society as money is needed to pay for a visa , transport and living expenses in the destination country
- it is easier for people from developed countries to migrate than people from less developed countries- in 2017, UK citizens could travel to over 150 countries without a visa, while for citizens of Afghanistan it was less than 25
what are some benefits of flow of people?
- immigrants can create economic growth as they do job’s that country’s citizens cant do such as skilled engineering jobs or that citizens don’t want to do such as logging or mining
- many migrants send money back home to their families or home communities which can significantly the amount of capital flowing into less developed countries = economic growth and multiplier effect by boosting other local industries
how can unequal flows of people cause problems?
1- inequalities= as less developed countries suffer from ‘brain drain’ as skilled people leave and take their knowledge with them which reinforces existing inequalities between countries
2- conflict= low-skilled migrants are often happier to work for less money than low-skilled locals. By employing them, companies may depress wages for the local population causing conflict between the local and migrant populations
3- injustice= migrant workers are sometimes made to work in dangerous conditions for little money e.g. in Qatar, several thousands of migrants have died building facilities for 2022 FIFA World Cup
explain idea of unequal flows of money
- flows of money can cause remittances, foreign aid, foreign direct investment and income from trade
- flows of money are unequal- money often flows from developed countries to less developed countries e.g. govs and companies may invest in infrastructure or the extraction of minerals in less developed countries/ less developed countries rarely have the capital to invest in other countries
explain how flows of money can bring benefits to countries
- foreign direct investment allows foreign companies to take advantage of cheap raw materials and low labour costs, while the host country can benefit from foreign capital and expertise
- foreign aid can be used to improve living standards or to rebuild local infrastructure after a disaster
how can unequal flows of capital have negative impacts?
1- inequalities= foreign aid can create dependency which gov, which gives govs little incentives to improve their own countries
2- conflict= foreign aid can find its ways to armed groups and help to fund conflict. FDI can cause conflict between foreign companies and local people e.g. FDI in agriculture can lead to peasant farmers being evicted to create larger plantations
3- injustice= companies may pressure governments of less developed countries to pass laws that make it cheaper to invest there e.g. by cutting environmental regulation or weakening laws on working conditions
explain idea of unequal flows of ideas
- ideas about how the world works are dominated by developed countries
- before 1980s, most national governments took responsibility for providing welfare for their citizens and controlling imports through trade barriers to protect their national industries
- however in 1980s many developed countries began to think that the economy would work better without state intervention - maximum economic growth would only occur if barriers to trade were removed, state-owned companies were privatised and government spending was cut = neo-liberalism
- neo-liberal ideas have increased free trade which has led to more development within countries and less conflict between some countries
how can unequal flows of ideas have more negative impacts?
1- inequalities= neo-liberalism started in developed countries and has spread globally. It tends to concentrate wealth in the hands of a few e.g. large, wealthy businesses based in developed countries
2- conflict= if private companies and free trade in a less developed country are threatened by the decisions of the country’s government, developed countries may believe that their intervention is justified
3- injustice=govs and TNCs may argue that free trade and privatisation are the best way to help a country develop ; this justifies poor working conditions and environmental degradation in less developed countries