3.2 Feedback and review process Flashcards
What can result from little stakeholder involvement during the SDLC?
The product might not meet the stakeholder’s original or current vision.
What does early and frequent feedback allow for in the SDLC?
The early communication of potential quality problems.
What are potential consequences of failing to deliver what the stakeholder wants?
Costly rework, missed deadlines, blame games, and possibly complete project failure
How can frequent stakeholder feedback throughout the SDLC benefit the project?
It can prevent misunderstandings about requirements and ensure that changes to requirements are understood and implemented earlier.
What does frequent stakeholder feedback help the development team improve?
Their understanding of what they are building.
What does early and frequent stakeholder feedback allow the development team to focus on?
Features that deliver the most value to stakeholders and have the most positive impact on identified risks.
What does the ISO/IEC 20246 standard define?
A generic review process that provides a structured but flexible framework for tailoring a specific review process to a particular situation.
How should a review process be adapted if the required review is more formal?
More tasks described for the different activities will be needed.
What might be necessary due to the size of many work products in a review process?
The review process may need to be invoked multiple times to complete the review for the entire work product.
What are the activities in the review process according to the ISO/IEC 20246 standard?
Planning
Review initiation
Individual review
Communication and analysis
Fixing and reporting.
What is defined during the planning phase of the review process?
The scope of the review, including the purpose, work product to be reviewed, quality characteristics to be evaluated, areas to focus on, exit criteria, supporting information, effort, and timeframes for the review.
What is the goal of the review initiation phase?
To ensure that everyone and everything involved is prepared to start the review, including participants having access to the work product and understanding their roles and responsibilities.
What happens during the individual review phase?
Each reviewer assesses the quality of the work product and identifies anomalies, recommendations, and questions using review techniques such as checklist-based reviewing or scenario-based reviewing.
What is the focus during the communication and analysis phase of the review process?
Analyzing and discussing identified anomalies to determine their status, ownership, and required actions, typically done in a review meeting.
What is created for every defect identified during the fixing and reporting phase?
A defect report to follow up on corrective actions, and once exit criteria are met, the work product can be accepted and review results reported.
Who decides what is to be reviewed and provides resources such as staff and time for the review?
The Manager.
Who is responsible for creating and fixing the work product under review?
The Author.
Who ensures the effective running of review meetings, including mediation, time management, and creating a safe review environment?
The Moderator (also known as the facilitator).