3.1.1 Flashcards
When planning an audit, an auditor should
Determine materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
Planning involves establishing an overall audit strategy. For this purpose, the auditor determines materiality for the financial statements as a whole. Circumstances also may indicate that misstatements of classes of transactions, balances, or disclosures of lesser amounts could influence the economic decisions of users. In those cases, the auditor also determines materiality for particular classes of transactions, balances, and disclosures.
Before accepting an engagement to audit a new client, a CPA is required to obtain
The prospective client’s consent to make inquiries of the predecessor, if any.
The auditor should communicate with the predecessor auditor before accepting the engagement. Initiation of the communication is the responsibility of the auditor. Moreover, the auditor should seek permission from the prospective client to inquire of the predecessor before final engagement acceptance. Thus, the auditor should ask the client to authorize the predecessor to make a full response.
Audit plans are modified to suit the circumstances of particular engagements. A complete audit plan for an engagement usually should be developed
After the auditor has obtained an understanding of existing internal control.
The effectiveness of a client’s internal control has an inverse relationship with the evidence that must be gathered to support an opinion. Only after the understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal control, is obtained and the risks of material misstatement have been assessed can the auditor determine the nature, timing, and extent of further audit procedures (AU-C 315).
During the initial planning phase of an audit, a CPA most likely would
During the initial planning phase of an audit, a CPA most likely would
The first step in the audit process is the auditor’s decision whether to accept a client. After having decided to perform an audit, the auditor enters the initial planning phase. During initial planning, an auditor should, among other things, meet with the client to agree on the type, scope, and timing of certain aspects of the engagement (e.g., observation of inventory).
Certain individuals may have an attitude, character, or set of values that permit them to rationalize fraud. Moreover, individuals may have an incentive or be under pressure to commit fraud, or circumstances may provide an opportunity. The auditor’s concern about the risk of material misstatements due to fraud is least likely to be increased if management
Consists of many individuals that make operating and financing decisions.
Domination of the decision process by one individual or a small group (an opportunity to commit fraud) is a fraud risk factor. In that case, compensating controls, e.g., effective oversight by the audit committee, reduce risk (AU-C 240, Appendix).
An auditor who discovers that client employees have committed illegal activities that have a material effect on the client’s financial statements most likely would withdraw from the engagement if
The client does not take the remedial action that the auditor considers necessary.
When the auditor concludes that an illegal act has or is likely to have occurred, (s)he should discuss the matter with the appropriate level of management and request that any necessary remedial actions be taken. If the alleged illegal act has a material effect on the financial statements, or the client does not take the remedial action that the auditor considers necessary, the auditor should express a qualified or adverse opinion, depending on the level of materiality, or withdraw from the engagement.
Which of the following factors most likely would lead a CPA to conclude that a potential audit engagement should not be accepted?
It is unlikely that sufficient appropriate evidence is available to support an opinion on the financial statements.
The terms of the engagement should include management’s responsibility to provide access to all information and persons deemed necessary to the audit. Depending on the pervasiveness of the potential effects of the inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence, the result may be a qualification of the opinion or a disclaimer of an opinion if the engagement is accepted.
If accounts receivable turned over 7.1 times in Year 1 as compared with only 5.6 times in Year 2, it is possible that there were
Fictitious sales in Year 2.
The accounts receivable turnover is the ratio of sales to average receivables. Fictitious sales would increase both the numerator and denominator. Adding an equal amount to both the numerator and denominator decreases a fraction greater than 1.0. For example, adding 1 to both parts of the fraction 3/2 decreases it to 4/3. The turnover ratio would decrease still more in the next period because the fictitious items would continue to increase receivables (which are cumulative) but not sales (which are closed periodically).
Which of the following statements would least likely appear in an auditor’s engagement letter?
After performing our preliminary analytical procedures, we will discuss with you the other procedures we consider necessary to complete the engagement.
The terms of the engagement should be documented in an engagement letter that states the (1) objective and scope of the audit, (2) responsibilities of the auditor and management, (3) inherent limitations of the audit and internal control, (4) applicable financial reporting framework, and (5) expected form and content of audit reports. But the engagement letter does not describe the specific evidence collection process to be completed by the auditor.
If the auditor considers an act of noncompliance with laws and regulations to be sufficiently serious to warrant withdrawing from the engagement, the auditor would likely
Consult with legal counsel as to what other action, if any, should be taken.
According to AU-C 250, the auditor should consider consulting legal counsel in these circumstances. Such consultation may be necessary in determining the effects of continued association with the client or whether the auditor may have a duty to notify parties outside the client that overrides his or her duty of confidentiality to the client.
Analytical procedures are most appropriate when testing which of the following types of transactions?
Operating expense transactions.
Relationships involving income statement accounts tend to be more predictable than relationships involving only balance sheet accounts. Income statement accounts represent transactions over a period of time, but balance sheet accounts represent an amount at a moment in time. Thus, operating expense transactions are likely to be more predictable than balance sheet accounts.
An auditor should design the audit plan to
Implement the audit strategy.
An audit plan is developed and documented based on the overall audit strategy. It is more detailed than the audit strategy because it includes the nature, timing, and extent of work to be performed. The plan includes (1) risk assessment procedures, (2) further audit procedures at the assertion level, and (3) other procedures to comply with GAAS.
The objective of performing analytical procedures in planning an audit is to identify the existence of
Unusual transactions and events.
The objective of analytical procedures is to identify such things as the existence of unusual transactions and events, and amounts, ratios, and trends that might indicate matters that have financial statement and audit planning ramifications.
Which of the following would be considered an analytical procedure?
Comparing inventory balances to recent sales activities.
Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial data made by a study of plausible relationships among financial and nonfinancial data. Comparing inventory balances with recent sales activities is a study of a plausible relationship between these activities.
Which of the following circumstances would most likely cause an auditor to suspect that fraud exists in a client’s financial statements?
Significantly fewer responses to confirmation requests are received than expected.
If a condition or circumstance differs adversely from the auditor’s expectation, the auditor needs to consider the reason for such a difference. An example of such a condition is that confirmation requests disclose significant differences or yield fewer responses than expected.