3.08.23 Magda_ horizontal and vertical GBR Flashcards

1
Q

How much bone is lost during spontaneous healing after extraction?

A

~40% vertical height and ~60% horizontal width is lost in the 1st year.
After 1 year, it’s about 0.1 mm/year in the maxilla, and 0.4 mm/year in the mandible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does thin vs thick buccal bone affect the final soft tissue volume?

A

Chappuis 2000 (Buser group)
Facial bone thickness ≤ 1mm (Thin): 7x increase in soft tissue thickness - can do GBR after the collapse happens. Vertical loss 62% (7.5 mm)

Facial bone > 1mm (Thick): no soft tissue change. Vertical loss 9% (1.1 mm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the critical buccal bone thickness?

A

Spray 2000
1.8 mm

Examined >3000 implants - buccal bone measured after osteotomy prep and at 2nd stage.
Bone loss will occur if the thickness is < 1.8mm.
Bone will stay the same, or increase, if > 1.8 mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the different ridge deficiency classifications?

A

Siebert ‘83: Class I, II, III
Allen ‘85: Type B “Buccolingual”, Type A “Apico-coronal”, Type C “Combination”
Wang & Al-Shammari ‘02: H “Horizontal”, V “Vertical”, C “Combination”
Subcategories for “combination” - Small (≤ 3mm), Medium (4-6mm), Large ≥ 7mm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are techniques to obtain primary closure?

A

Greenstein ‘09
Flap advancement technique depends on how much advancement you need.
Minor (< 3mm) - Extend the full-thickness flap beyond the MGJ.
Moderate (3-6mm) - 2 vertical releasing incisions, and add 1mm periosteum scoring as needed
Major (≥ 7mm) - Deeper periosteal scoring of 3-5 mm into submucosa; and/or split-thickness flaps

Park ‘11
First vertical incision: 1.1 mm
Second vertical: 1.9mm
Periosteal releasing incision: 5.5 mm

Plonka ‘17
Similar to the above, but adds clinical applications:
Minor advancement (< 3 mm): Esthetic buccal flaps, Mucogingival pouch flaps, Periosteal pocket flaps.
Moderate advancement (4-6mm): Buccal pedicle, lingual pedicle, palatal advanced flap, lateral pedicle flap
Major advancement (≥ 7 mm): Hockey stick flap, remote flap, double flap, multilayer approaches

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the resorption times of BioMend, BioMend Extend, and BioGide?

A

BioMend: 6-8wks
* Bovine tendon - 100% type I collagen.
BioMend Extend: 18wks (about 4 months)
* Bovine tendon - 100% type I collagen.
BioGide: 24 weeks (6 months)
* Porcine dermis - Types I and III collagen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does cross-linked vs non-crosslinked collagen membranes compare on bone?

A

Garcia ‘17
NSSD between the groups
However, crosslinked had a slightly greater exposure risk.
Tissue integration and compatibility may be better in noncrosslinked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How does cross-linked vs non-crosslinked collagen membranes compare on bone?

A

Garcia ‘17
NSSD between the groups
However, crosslinked had a slightly greater exposure risk.
Tissue integration and compatibility may be better in noncrosslinked

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What types of fixation are available for membrane fixation? What are suturing techniques to use?

A

Screws - Need bone penetration; membrane might twist. Can either leave it or remove it.

Pins - Need bone penetration; Patient sometimes complains of trauma. Can either leave it or remove it.

Absorbable sutures - Need split thickness somewhere to fixate the sutures. Sutures may become loose at flap closure. Self absorb over time.

Urban ‘16 - Double layer suturing technique. Grab the periosteum only with the suture (both buccally and lingually) and tie; this will “compress” the membrane over the graft and reduce tension for the final flap closure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the horizontal bone augmentation decision tree?

A

Fu & Wang ‘11
Buccolingual bone width:
≥ 3.5 mm:
* If primary implant stability: do simultaneous “sandwich” bone augmentation
* If no primary stability: Staged GBR and place implant later

< 3.5 mm: Primary stability is not possible.
Do onlay graft. If tissue thickness is ≥ 1.5 mm: (Mandible: autogenous; Maxilla: allogenic)

4-5 mm: Ridge split or expansion

This was explained a bit better by Yu & Wang ‘22

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the Sandwich bone augmentation? And, does adding a 2nd membrane provide additional benefit?

A

Wang ‘04 - Sandwich technique
Different layers to help avoid peri-implantitis in the future after implant placement.

Implant surface -> autogenous layer -> allograft -> bovine bone -> collagen membrane

Wen ‘18 Modified Sandwich technique
Same as above, but the allograft layer uses cancellous on the inner, and cortical on the outer

Fu & Wang ‘13
Compared Sandwich technique vs. Sandwich + extra membrane (bovine pericardium).
Finding: Additional membrane reduced bone resorption at 2, 4 ,6mm apical to the bone crest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is contour bone augmentation?

A

Buser ‘08
Implant -> autogenous layer-> DBBM -> Double layer noncrosslinked collagen membrane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the sausage bone graft technique?

A

Urban ‘11
Autogenous bone, either alone or in combination with the anorganic bovine bone (BioOss) 1:1 ratio
Use resorbable membrane and pins

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Periosteal Pocket flap technique for GBR?

A

Steigmann ‘92
Used for horizontal GBR
Use the periosteum as a “pocket” to contain the apical part of the graft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the ridge split technique & how effective is it?

A

Simion ‘92
Describes the ridge split technique
Splitting alveolar ridge longitudinally
Using chisel
Greenstick fracture
Surgical fracture extend to the depth 5-7 mm
3-4 mm intact bone left apical to the fracture

Milinkovic ‘14
Ridge split complications: 6.8%
Survival rate 97%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are different methods of vertical bone augmentation? How effective are they?

A

Urban ‘19
Distraction osteogenesis: 8.04 mm gain, 47.3% complications
GBR: 4.18 mm gain, 12.1% complications
Block grafts: 3.46mm gain, 23.9% complications

Overall bone gain of 4.16 mm

17
Q

What are the different zones of flap advancement?

A

Urban
Zone I : Retromolar. Use periosteal elevator and reflect from bone
Zone II: High mylohyoid attachment. Identify mylohyoid and use blunt instrument to push the tissue that’s superior to the muscle lingually.
III: Deep mylohyoid - Hockey stick incision; Use blunt side of blade to dissect the tissues

18
Q

What is the surgical management of Significant Maxillary anterior ridge defects?

A

Urban ‘16
Type I: Deep vestibule - remote flap + periosteal incision
Type II: Shallow vestibule - Safety flap + papilla shift technique
Type III: Deep vestibule - remote flap + periosteal incision
Type IV: Shallow vestibule - Safety flap + papilla shift technique

19
Q

How does vertical bone deficiency affect the likelihood of incomplete bone regeneration? What about membrane exposure?

A

Urban ‘21
Each 1mm addition of height deficiency affects the likelihood of incomplete bone regeneration by 2.5 times.

Simion ‘00
Less bone gain when membrane is exposed (41.6%) compared to non-exposed (96.6%)

20
Q

How does membrane exposure affect the regeneration rate?

A

Simion ‘94
ePTFE exposure: reduces regeneration rate from 96.6% to 46.5%

21
Q

What are the classifications for ePTFE healing problems? What about for dPTFE?

A

For ePTFE:
Verardi & Simion ‘07
Class I: Small soft tissue fenestration ≤ 3mm
Class II: Wide opening > 3mm

Fontana ‘11
Class I: Small membrane exposure (≤ 3mm) w/o purulent exudate
Class II: Large exposure > 3mm w/o purulent exudate
Class III : Membrane exposure w/ purulent exudate
Class IV: Abscess formation w/o membrane exposure

22
Q

How does bone height change in implants treated with GBR vs. no GBR?

A

Machtei ‘01
Only 2 studies in meta-analysis
6 times more bone gain in nonexposed compared with exposed sites