3.02 Authorities and Duties Governing Lawyers Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Basic Tracks of Lawyer Regulation

A
  1. Under the Authority of the Licensing Court and Jurisdictional Rules
  2. Malpractice = Private Cause of Action
  3. Criminal Sanctions and Various Other Methods
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. Violation of Jurisdictional Rules = Misconduct
A

Misconduct To:-Violate or Attempt to Violate the Rules-Knowingly Assist or Induce Another to Violate-Commit a Criminal Act that Reflects Adversely-Engage in Dishonest Conduct-State or Imply Ability to Improperly Influence Government-Knowingly Assist a Judge or Judicial Officer to Conduct that Violates Applicable Codes of Conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Criminal Conduct Misconduct
A

Commit a Criminal Act that Reflects Adversely On Lawyer Honesty; Trustworthiness; Fitness (Generally)”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. Dishonest Conduct Misconduct
A

Engage in Conduct Involving: Dishonest; Fraud; Deceit; Misrepresentation or Failure to Disclose

NOTE: Consider obligations to client confidentiality; Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Sanctions for Misconduct
A

Professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate a lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice.

  • Criminal Contempt of Court for Misrepresentation of Credentials
  • Professional Discipline of a Lawyer (Civil Action, NOT Double Jeopardy)
  • Usually NOT the Loss of Attorney-Client Privilege
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Disbarment

A

Disbarment {Pattern of Neglect Causing Serious Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Suspension

A

-Suspension for Fixed Period {Injury is Not Serious

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reprimand

A

-Reprimand / Censure (Public) {Merely Negligent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Admonition

A

-Admonition (Private) {Little or No Actual / Potential Injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Loss of Fee

A

-Loss of Legal Fees {Breach of Fiduciary Duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Reporting Misconduct
A

A lawyer who KNOWS another lawyer has committed a violation that raises a SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION of HONESTY, TRUSTWORTHINESS, or FITNESS as a lawyer SHALL INFORM

Substantial = Seriousness NOT Quantum of EvidenceDoes NOT Require the Disclosure of Confidential Client Information (Rule 1.6)
-Should, however, encourage client to disclose.

In Re Himmel (Ill. 1988) negotiating a settlement agreement > 2:1 with lawyer who defrauded client, but did not report other lawyers fraud = Suspension

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Jurisdiction of Discipline
A

Always Subject to Discipline of Jurisdiction Admitted To

Safe Harbor IF conduct conforms to rules of jurisdiction lawyer REASONABLY BELIEVES predominate effect will occur.

Subject Also to the Jurisdiction in Which the Conduct Occurred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Choice of Law
A

Before a Tribunal = Rules of Jurisdiction in Which Tribunal Sits

Any Other Conduct = Rules of Jurisdiction Where Conduct Occurred OR Jurisdiction Where Predominate Effect of the Conduct Occurred So long as choice is REASONABLY related to predominate effect, parties may contract for choice of disciplinary law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Malpractice, Civil Case
A

Elements of a Civil Malpractice Case

  • Legal Duty Owed by Lawyer
  • STANDARD OF CARE: Failure of the Lawyer to Exercise the Skill and Knowledge an Ordinary Lawyer would Exercise in Similar Circumstances
  • Damage Suffered as a RESULT of the Lawyers Conduct (Proximate CauseWhether Compliance with the Rules is a Breach is a Jurisdictional Question, but generally rules does not give rise to, but may be evidence of, a cause of action for malpractice.)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Malpractice, Criminal Case
A

Elements of a Criminal Defendants Malpractice Case

-Same as Civil, but Must have the Conviction Set Aside Before a Complaint is Timely

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. DUTY OF CARE, Standard of Care
A

STANDARD OF CARE: Failure of the Lawyer to Exercise the Skill and Knowledge an Ordinary Lawyer would Exercise in Similar CircumstancesMay have a duty to inform client of own malpractice

17
Q
  1. DUTY OF CARE, Competent Representation
A

Legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and skill necessary for representationDiligence-Reasonable diligence and promptness-Whatever lawful and ethical measures are required

18
Q
  1. DUTY OF CARE, Competent Representation Factors
A

Factors (Relative) =

  • complexity and specialized nature,
  • general experience, -training and experience in field,
  • preparation and study (attention) able to give,
  • whether referral is feasible
19
Q
  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A

Fee Forfeiture WITHOUT Harm

20
Q
  1. Malpractice Remedies
A
  • Tort Damages for Actual Damages
  • Damages for Breach of Contract
  • Damages for Breach of Fiduciary Duty (w/Harm)
  • Fee Forfeiture for Clear and Serious Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Punitive Damages-Statutory Remedies for Consumers (i.e. Debt Collection Statutes)
21
Q
  1. Malpractice Waivers
A

SHALL NOT: Make Agreement to Limit Prospective Liability UNLESS Independently Rep.Settle Claim UNLESS advised in writing of desirability of seeking outside representation AND given reasonable opportunity to seek Independent Rep.

22
Q

Duties to Non-Clients

A

Prospective ClientsPersons to Whom the Lawyer Has Expressly Assumed a Duty
- May depend on whether lawyer as invited the party to rely.

Persons Lawyer Knows the Client Wanted Benefit
-Requires proof of intent, may require that proof in signed writing.

Beneficiaries that Lawyer Has Assisted a Fiduciary Client to Harm