3.02 Authorities and Duties Governing Lawyers Flashcards
Basic Tracks of Lawyer Regulation
- Under the Authority of the Licensing Court and Jurisdictional Rules
- Malpractice = Private Cause of Action
- Criminal Sanctions and Various Other Methods
- Violation of Jurisdictional Rules = Misconduct
Misconduct To:-Violate or Attempt to Violate the Rules-Knowingly Assist or Induce Another to Violate-Commit a Criminal Act that Reflects Adversely-Engage in Dishonest Conduct-State or Imply Ability to Improperly Influence Government-Knowingly Assist a Judge or Judicial Officer to Conduct that Violates Applicable Codes of Conduct
- Criminal Conduct Misconduct
Commit a Criminal Act that Reflects Adversely On Lawyer Honesty; Trustworthiness; Fitness (Generally)”
- Dishonest Conduct Misconduct
Engage in Conduct Involving: Dishonest; Fraud; Deceit; Misrepresentation or Failure to Disclose
NOTE: Consider obligations to client confidentiality; Prejudicial to the Administration of Justice”
- Sanctions for Misconduct
Professionally answerable only for offenses that indicate a lack of those characteristics relevant to law practice.
- Criminal Contempt of Court for Misrepresentation of Credentials
- Professional Discipline of a Lawyer (Civil Action, NOT Double Jeopardy)
- Usually NOT the Loss of Attorney-Client Privilege
Disbarment
Disbarment {Pattern of Neglect Causing Serious Harm
Suspension
-Suspension for Fixed Period {Injury is Not Serious
Reprimand
-Reprimand / Censure (Public) {Merely Negligent
Admonition
-Admonition (Private) {Little or No Actual / Potential Injury
Loss of Fee
-Loss of Legal Fees {Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- Reporting Misconduct
A lawyer who KNOWS another lawyer has committed a violation that raises a SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION of HONESTY, TRUSTWORTHINESS, or FITNESS as a lawyer SHALL INFORM
Substantial = Seriousness NOT Quantum of EvidenceDoes NOT Require the Disclosure of Confidential Client Information (Rule 1.6)
-Should, however, encourage client to disclose.
In Re Himmel (Ill. 1988) negotiating a settlement agreement > 2:1 with lawyer who defrauded client, but did not report other lawyers fraud = Suspension
- Jurisdiction of Discipline
Always Subject to Discipline of Jurisdiction Admitted To
Safe Harbor IF conduct conforms to rules of jurisdiction lawyer REASONABLY BELIEVES predominate effect will occur.
Subject Also to the Jurisdiction in Which the Conduct Occurred
- Choice of Law
Before a Tribunal = Rules of Jurisdiction in Which Tribunal Sits
Any Other Conduct = Rules of Jurisdiction Where Conduct Occurred OR Jurisdiction Where Predominate Effect of the Conduct Occurred So long as choice is REASONABLY related to predominate effect, parties may contract for choice of disciplinary law.
- Malpractice, Civil Case
Elements of a Civil Malpractice Case
- Legal Duty Owed by Lawyer
- STANDARD OF CARE: Failure of the Lawyer to Exercise the Skill and Knowledge an Ordinary Lawyer would Exercise in Similar Circumstances
- Damage Suffered as a RESULT of the Lawyers Conduct (Proximate CauseWhether Compliance with the Rules is a Breach is a Jurisdictional Question, but generally rules does not give rise to, but may be evidence of, a cause of action for malpractice.)
- Malpractice, Criminal Case
Elements of a Criminal Defendants Malpractice Case
-Same as Civil, but Must have the Conviction Set Aside Before a Complaint is Timely