3. WORD LEARNING Flashcards

1
Q

types of word learning studies

A
  • looking while listening/pointing (comprehension)
  • recording how children talk in naturalistic settings, asking them to name things (production)

teaching children new words in lab
- what can they learn?
- how do they learn?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

“point and name” learning

A
  • usually only nouns
  • point and name is not common and not universal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the mapping problem

A
  • example of foreign word “gavagai”
  • when something is labelled it could apply to multiple aspects
  • under extension
  • over extension

Quine, 1960

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

comprehension in infants

A
  • appear to start to comprehend nouns as early as 6 months
  • infants start to comprehend verbs later - 10 months
  • 2 year olds comprehend 2-3x as many words as they produce

comprehension precedes production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

looking while listening task

A
  • 2 options, “look at hand” “… apple”
  • between 18 and 24 months they get much faster (Fernald)
  • by 18 months they don’t even need the full word
    (Fernald, Swingley, & Pinto, 2001)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

early noun bias

A

cross-linguistically, predominance of nouns in early vocabularies

e.g., 40% of English speaking childrens first 50 words - Nelson

more nouns even in “verb friendlier” languages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

natural partitions hypothesis

A

early nouns denote concrete objects easily individuated from surroundings

actions, states etc. tend to apply to entities labelled by nouns, less clearly defined in space & time

Gentner, 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

socially mediated word learning

A
  • not all early words are nouns (hello)
  • not all early nouns are discrete objects (breakfast)
  • learning occurs in situations where easiest to read adult’s intentions, irrespective of word class
  • happend often with nouns

Tomasello, 2003

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Variety of early word production

A

Variety of situations
- names for people and objects
- names for actions
- names for properties

Tomasello, 1992

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

under-extension

A

word used only in specific context or specific exemplar

words used in specific contexts where adults would use in a wide range of contexts

  • ‘bye’ only when putting the telephone receiver down
  • ‘there’ only when putting an object in a location
  • refer to the word flower to only mean a rose and not other flowers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Overextension

A

word used beyond its true meaning

overextension errors are frequent
- e.g., calling a ball an apple
- make erorrs until ~ 2.5 years
- category error
- vocabulary limitations

(Rescorla, 1980)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Object constraint - ‘innate’ constraint

A
  • words refer to objects
  • explains early noun bias

Gentner, 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

whole-object - ‘innate’ constraint

A
  • words refer to whole object rather than their parts
  • “gavagai” = whole animal

Markman, 1991

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

principle of contrast - ‘innate’ constraint

A
  • no words have exactly the same meaning
  • explains how the child overcomes overextension

Clark, 1995

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mutual exclusivity - ‘innate constraint’

A
  • no object has more than one name
  • helps children override the ‘whole object constraint’ and learn the names for parts of objects

Markman, 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Are constraints specific to language?

A

example
- my uncle gave me this (show object)
- give me the one my dog likes to play with (from array)
- 3 year olds select new object, social inferencing on intention unrelated to meaning of words

Diesendruck & Markson, 2001

17
Q

syntactic bootstrapping hypothesis

A
  • based on the idea that there are innate links between syntactic and semantic categories
  • learners can make inferences about semantics from their observations on synactic category

Gleitman, 1990

18
Q

structural cues - kneading task

A

3-5 year olds shown picture of someone kneading a substance in a bowl
- do you know what is means to sib? (other questions about ‘sib’)

task: pick sibling, a sib, or sib from a selection of pictures depicting several actions, substances, and containers
- sibbing = picture of kneading
- a sib = picture of bowl
- sib = picture of substance

Brown, 1957

19
Q

structural cues - fep task

A

4 year olds pick different object of same kind when asked to find the fep one, but a different abject when asked to find the fep

Gelman & Markman, 1985

20
Q

structural cues study: how infants extend novel nouns and adjectives

A

14 month olds

with nouns children extended the noun to the category but not the property
- noun/adj - new term (syntactic), , property - colour, category - animal

with adjectives children do not extent to the category or property

Waxman and Booth, 2001

21
Q

the social-pragmatic approach

A
  • children learn words and word meaning from pragmatic cues in the environment which remove ambiguities around word meaning
  • word learning is constrained in 2 main ways:
  1. the social world is structured: routines, games, patterned social interaction
  2. social cognitive skills the infant has: joint attention, intention reading

Tomasello, 2003

22
Q

Social pragmatic approach: routines

A

Children learn language in familiar social contexts in repeated daily routines
- young children learn almost all their early language in cultural routines
- cross culturally children are engaged in a wide range of social routines and learn most of their early words in familiar contexts

23
Q

the social-pragmatic approach: social cognitive skills

A
  • during joint revolution adults use language and children attempt to interpret the communicative intent
  • world learning occurs when children attempt to interpret the communicative intentions as expressed in the utterance
  • the shared common groupd reduces the possible referents
24
Q

the social pragmatic approach: intentional reading

A
  • children use speaker’s intentions to infer meaning
  • child already knows name of familiar object on table & knows the adult knows. So can assume that the adult intends the novel object when the adult asks …. (Baldwin)
  • 2 year olds understand that a novel referent refers to object adult looking for rather than objects they have rejected
25
Q

social pragmatic approach: acquisition of verbs

A

children able to interpret adult’s anticipation of what will happen and learn verbs which relate to forthcoming action
(Tomasello & Kruger, 1992)

children can differentiate between intended and accidental actions when learning new verbs
(Tomasello & Barton, 1994)