3. Theft Flashcards
R v Morris
Taking items from shelf in shop and replacing label taken from lower-priced good counts as an assumption
R v Gomez
D can appropriate even with owner’s consent
R v Hinks
D persuaded/coerced man of limited intelligence to give her money - donor’s state of money irrelevant, so possible to steal a ‘gift’
R v Adams
D purchased goods not knowing that they were stolen – then discovers they were and keeps them - acquitted by means of s 3(2)
Williams v Phillips
Householder doesn’t abandon goods that he puts in his dustbin
Parker v British Airways Board
If BA had shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, it could have secured possession of the bracelet before D found it
R v Turner (No 2)
Possible to steal one’s own property, if it is in the possession and control of another
R v Hall
Travel agent took money for flights and instead used it to pay off creditors - held: s 5(3) did not apply because it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way
Davidge v Burnett
S 5(3) applies in respect of cheques given by flatmates to use for paying to gas bill and used instead to buy Christmas presents
A-G’s Reference (No 1 of 1983)
D mistakenly paid for overtime she hadn’t done - s 5(4) applies and money belongs to employer
R v Robinson
Act does not require D’s belief to be reasonably held – as long as it is genuinely held, he will not be dishonest
R v Ghosh (per Lord Lane)
o (1) According to ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people, was what was done dishonest?
o (2) If it was dishonest by those standards, did D himself realise that what he was doing was by those standards dishonest?
Edwards v Ddin
Person cannot be convicted of theft if he only forms the dishonest intent after ownership of the property has passed to him
Corcoran v Whent
Ownership of food passes when it is eaten – or possibly earlier, e.g. when it is ordered and cooked in a restaurant
R v Lloyd
S 6(1) should not be referred to where it is clear that the D does intend the owner to lose his property permanently
No intention permanently to deprive in relation to borrowing, unless intention is to return it in such a state that all its goodness, virtue and practical value has gone