3. Theft Flashcards

1
Q

R v Morris

A

Taking items from shelf in shop and replacing label taken from lower-priced good counts as an assumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Gomez

A

D can appropriate even with owner’s consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Hinks

A

D persuaded/coerced man of limited intelligence to give her money - donor’s state of money irrelevant, so possible to steal a ‘gift’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Adams

A

D purchased goods not knowing that they were stolen – then discovers they were and keeps them - acquitted by means of s 3(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Williams v Phillips

A

Householder doesn’t abandon goods that he puts in his dustbin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Parker v British Airways Board

A

If BA had shown an intention to exercise control over the building and things in it, it could have secured possession of the bracelet before D found it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Turner (No 2)

A

Possible to steal one’s own property, if it is in the possession and control of another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Hall

A

Travel agent took money for flights and instead used it to pay off creditors - held: s 5(3) did not apply because it was not established that his clients expected him to retain and deal with the money in a particular way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Davidge v Burnett

A

S 5(3) applies in respect of cheques given by flatmates to use for paying to gas bill and used instead to buy Christmas presents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A-G’s Reference (No 1 of 1983)

A

D mistakenly paid for overtime she hadn’t done - s 5(4) applies and money belongs to employer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Robinson

A

Act does not require D’s belief to be reasonably held – as long as it is genuinely held, he will not be dishonest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Ghosh (per Lord Lane)

A

o (1) According to ordinary standards of reasonable and honest people, was what was done dishonest?
o (2) If it was dishonest by those standards, did D himself realise that what he was doing was by those standards dishonest?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Edwards v Ddin

A

Person cannot be convicted of theft if he only forms the dishonest intent after ownership of the property has passed to him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Corcoran v Whent

A

Ownership of food passes when it is eaten – or possibly earlier, e.g. when it is ordered and cooked in a restaurant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Lloyd

A

S 6(1) should not be referred to where it is clear that the D does intend the owner to lose his property permanently

No intention permanently to deprive in relation to borrowing, unless intention is to return it in such a state that all its goodness, virtue and practical value has gone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

R v Cahill

A

D took pile of newspapers left outside newsagents, thinking they were pile of rubbish - no intention permanently to deprive

17
Q

R v Scott

A

D ‘stole’ pair of curtains from store – intended to return them following day for a refund - s 6(1) applies here, since she had treated the thing as her own to dispose of regardless of the other’s rights

18
Q

R v Raphael

A

Example of ransom case – D had taken victims’ cars by force, demanding money in return for their return - situation covered by 6(1)

19
Q

DPP v J

A

Snapping headphones, rendering them useless - s 6(1) applies

20
Q

R v Fernandes

A

Solicitor who used money in client accounts for risky investments - s 6(1) applies