3. The Kornilov affair and its impact on the govt and the Bolsheviks Flashcards
General Lavr Kornilov
- Appointed commander-in-chief of Russia’s armies
- Owed appointment to reputation for toughness and popularity among middle and upper classes
- Fighting general from humble origins
Decorated for gallantry in Russo-Japanese war and current war against Germany
Commander of Petrograd military district - wanted to restore order - by force if needed
Downside of Kornilov
- Suicidally brave - political grasp limited
- Indicated he would take up post only if series of conditions met
What conditions did Kornilov want to be met to take up the post?
- Desertion and acts of treason in rear areas of battle-zone punishable by death
- Army commander-in-chief accountable for actions not to govt bus to his conscience and the people
- No interference by civilian politicians in military affairs
- Railway workers + workers in defence-related industries - placed under army control (made subject to military punishments)
- Strikes in all industries banned for duration of war (violations punishable by death)
How did Kerensky react to Kornilov’s terms?
- Didn’t break off negotiations - reluctant to alienate army’s leaders (knew he might have to call on them to suppress disorder in Petrograd)
Further demands by Kornilov in August 1917
- Reported to Kerensky that Kornilov upped stakes further - called for imposition of martial law (military govt) in Petrograd
- Kornilov intent on making himself a military dictator
27 August - dismissed as commander-in-chief
How did Kornilov respond to his dismissal?
- Ordered detachment of troops under General Krymov’s command to march on Petrograd (counter-revolution in the making)
Kerensky forced to turn to PS for assistance
Petrograd Soviet’s assistance to PG against Kornilov
- Soviet duly mobilised defence of capital - considerable resources:
- Soldiers of Petrograd garrison
- Kronstadt sailors
- Red Guards (issued w/ weapons on Kerensky’s order)
What happened to Krymov’s advance on Petrograd as a result of the Soviet’s defence?
- Petered out without a shot being fired
- Railwaymen loyal to Soviet held up troop trains heading towards capital
- Representatives of the PS, many Bolsheviks, infiltrated Krymov’s advancing forces
Succeeded in turning ordinary soldiers against their officers
Kornilov placed under arrest (escaped from custody during Oct Rev - killed in early battle of civil war)
Overall impact of Kornilov affair on the govt
- Left Kerensky badly damaged - found himself under fire from left and right
How was Kerensky under fire from the left after Kornilov?
- Suspected of having been willing participant in Kornilov’s schemes
- Another claim - Kerensky had shown himself to be an enemy of the working class (through apparent willingness to place worker’s under military control)
- Indication of left-wing disillusionment w/ Kerensky after Kornilov affair was resignation of Chernov (SR leader) as minister of agriculture
How was Kerensky under fire from the right after Kornilov?
- Those clamouring for restoration of order and discipline - industrialists, nobility, senior army officers and propertied classes
- Accused Kerensky of political cowardice - right-wing argument that he should have stood by Kornilov (implement his programme, having done the right thing by appointing him)
Big winners in Kornilov affair
Bolsheviks:
- Able to project themselves in their propaganda as saviours of the revolution
- In position to go back to the attack
- Surge in popularity for Bolsheviks
- Polled strongly in city council elections (Aug and Sept)
- 33% of vote in Petrograd, 51% Moscow
- Winning control of soviets in major cities
Trotsky
- Returned from exile in May - became chairman of Petrograd Soviet at end of September
Moscow Soviet
Controlled by Bolsheviks by the end of Sept
Who dominated Soviets after elections in Aug and Sept?
- Loose coalitions of Bolsheviks, Left SRs and Menshevik Internationalists in several other cities
Stranglehold of mainstream SRs and ‘revolutionary defences’ Mensheviks on the soviets - BROKEN