3. The God Delusion: Arguments for God's Existence Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Thomas Aquinas’s 1st Proof?

A
  1. The Unmoved Mover
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas’s 1st Proof refer to?

A
  1. Nothing moves without a prior mover. That leads us to a regress, from which the only escape is God. Something had to make the first move, and that something is called God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Thomas Aquinas’s 2nd Proof?

A
  1. The Uncaused Cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas’s 2nd Proof refer to?

A
  1. Nothing is caused by itself. Every effect has a prior cause, and again we are pushed back into regress. This has to be terminated with a first cause, which is God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Thomas Aquinas’s 3rd Proof?

A
  1. The Cosmological Argument
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas’s 3rd Proof refer to?

A
  1. There must have been a time when no physical things existed. But, since physical things exist now, there must have been something nonphysical to bring them into existence, and that is God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the core error in Thomas Aquinas’s Proofs?

A
  1. All three invoke the idea of a regress, and make the unwarranted assumption that God is immune to regress himself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How are Omniscience and Omnipotence incompatible?

A
  1. An omniscient being already knows how it will intervene using his omnipotence.
  2. Therefore, it cannot change it’s mind, so it is not omnipotent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What verse did Karen Owen use to describe the incompatibility of Omnipotence and Omniscience?

A
  1. Can omniscient God, who
    Knows the future, find
    The omnipotence to
    Change his future mind?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why is the idea of Infinite Regress flawed?

A
  1. Some natural process do have a limited level of regress
  2. For example, neutrons and protons are the smallest components in an atom
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof?

A
  1. The Argument from Degree
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas’s 4th proof refer to?

A
  1. We notice that things in this world differ. There are degrees of, say, goodness or perfection. But we judge these degrees only by comparison with a maximum. Humans can be both good and bad, so the maximum goodness cannot rest in us. Therefore there must be some other maximum to set the standard for perfection, and we call that maximum God.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why is Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof a poor argument?

A
  1. Not all degrees of comparison require a perfect maximum
  2. For example, saying someone is smelly doesn’t require a being with perfect smelliness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Thomas Aquinas’s 5th Proof?

A
  1. The Teleological Argument or
  2. Argument from Design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof refer to?

A
  1. Things in the world, especially living things, look as if they have been designed. Nothing that we know looks designed unless it was designed. Therefore, there must have been a designer, and we call that designer God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which of Aquinas’s Proofs is still commonly used today?

A
  1. 5th Proof
17
Q

Why is Thomas Aquinas’s 5th Proof inacurate?

A
  1. We now know of many things that look designed, but were not
18
Q

How did Darwin contribute to debunking Thomas Aquinas’s 5th Proof?

A
  1. His theory of evolution by natural selection blew it out of the water
19
Q

What are the two main categories of arguments for God’s existence?

A
  1. A priori
  2. A posteriori
20
Q

In what category do Thomas Aquinas’s 5 Proofs belong?

A
  1. A posteriori
21
Q

What is the most famous a priori argument for God’s existence?

A
  1. The Ontological Argument
22
Q

Who is the father of the Ontological Argument?

A
  1. St Anselm of Canterbury in 1078
23
Q

What is odd about Anselm’s Ontological Argument?

A
  1. It was first addressed to God in the form of a prayer
24
Q

What is the Ontological Argument?

A
  1. The argument that God, being defined as the most great or perfect, must exist, since a God who exists is greater than a God that doesn’t
25
Q

Why is the Ontological Argument false?

A
  1. There are many things that exist in our thoughts, that simply do not exist
26
Q

What two people wrote the most definitive refutations of the Ontological Argument?

A
  1. David Hume
  2. Immanuel Kant
27
Q

How did Immanuel Kant refute the Ontological Argument?

A
  1. It assumes that to exist is more perfect than to not-exist
28
Q

What is the Argument from Incomplete Devastation?

A
  1. A plane crashed killing 143 passengers and crew, but one child survived with only 3rd degree burns, therefore God exists
29
Q

What is the Argument from Possible Worlds

A
  1. If things had been different, than things would be different, and that would be bad. Therefore, God exists
30
Q

What is the Argument from Sheer Will?

A
  1. I do believe in God! I do believe in God! I do. I do. I do. Therefore God exists
31
Q

What is the Argument from Non-belief?

A
  1. The majority of the world are nonbelievers in Christianity. This is exactly what Satan intended, therefore God exists.
32
Q

What is the Argument from Post Death Experience?

A
  1. Person x died an atheist. He now realizes his mistake. Therefore God exists
33
Q

What is the Argument from Emotional Blackmail?

A
  1. God loves you. How could you be so heartless as to not believe in him. Therefore, God exists
34
Q

What is the Argument from Beauty?

A
  1. The world is beautiful, therefore, God exists
35
Q

What is the Argument from Personal Experience?

A
  1. I have experienced what I believe was God, therefore, God exists