3. The God Delusion: Arguments for God's Existence Flashcards
What is Thomas Aquinas’s 1st Proof?
- The Unmoved Mover
What does Thomas Aquinas’s 1st Proof refer to?
- Nothing moves without a prior mover. That leads us to a regress, from which the only escape is God. Something had to make the first move, and that something is called God
What is Thomas Aquinas’s 2nd Proof?
- The Uncaused Cause
What does Thomas Aquinas’s 2nd Proof refer to?
- Nothing is caused by itself. Every effect has a prior cause, and again we are pushed back into regress. This has to be terminated with a first cause, which is God
What is Thomas Aquinas’s 3rd Proof?
- The Cosmological Argument
What does Thomas Aquinas’s 3rd Proof refer to?
- There must have been a time when no physical things existed. But, since physical things exist now, there must have been something nonphysical to bring them into existence, and that is God
What is the core error in Thomas Aquinas’s Proofs?
- All three invoke the idea of a regress, and make the unwarranted assumption that God is immune to regress himself.
How are Omniscience and Omnipotence incompatible?
- An omniscient being already knows how it will intervene using his omnipotence.
- Therefore, it cannot change it’s mind, so it is not omnipotent.
What verse did Karen Owen use to describe the incompatibility of Omnipotence and Omniscience?
- Can omniscient God, who
Knows the future, find
The omnipotence to
Change his future mind?
Why is the idea of Infinite Regress flawed?
- Some natural process do have a limited level of regress
- For example, neutrons and protons are the smallest components in an atom
What is Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof?
- The Argument from Degree
What does Thomas Aquinas’s 4th proof refer to?
- We notice that things in this world differ. There are degrees of, say, goodness or perfection. But we judge these degrees only by comparison with a maximum. Humans can be both good and bad, so the maximum goodness cannot rest in us. Therefore there must be some other maximum to set the standard for perfection, and we call that maximum God.
Why is Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof a poor argument?
- Not all degrees of comparison require a perfect maximum
- For example, saying someone is smelly doesn’t require a being with perfect smelliness
What is Thomas Aquinas’s 5th Proof?
- The Teleological Argument or
- Argument from Design
What does Thomas Aquinas’s 4th Proof refer to?
- Things in the world, especially living things, look as if they have been designed. Nothing that we know looks designed unless it was designed. Therefore, there must have been a designer, and we call that designer God