3 - reg Flashcards
The unprotected right had been mentioned in the contract of sale and a constructive trust was triggered preventing the purchaser taking free from that right
Lyus v Prowsa Developments
Beneficial interest of a wife in actual occupation is campable of taking an overriding interest under LRA over effect of legal and registered mortgage.
HoL held yes - actual occupation
Williams and Glyns’ Bank v Boland
An equitable easement (right of way) which was not protected by any entry on the register, was a right openly exercised and enjoyed and it adversely affected
Celsteel v Alton House Holdings
To have an overriding interest it was necessary to have an interest in the land and be in actual occupation
stepdaughter had no interest in land so she could not be in actual occupation
Strand Securities v Caswell
Actual Occupation interpreted using ordinary words. Says who?
Lord Wilberforce
H arranged to sell matrimonial home and keep proceeds. She was in hosp giving birth. Court held she was in actual occupation
Chhokar v Chhokar
Actual occupation was not established by moving furniture and carpets into new home
Abbey National Building Society v Cann
Property in H name - he fell into default. Did W have beneficial interest. No - she made no financial contribution in buying the prop. She only helped with redecorating
Lloyds Bank v Rosset
Successful overreaching
Property purchased with money from W parents. Parents had BI. Bank sought repossession - they overreached parents BI and paid money to two trustees (couple)
City of London Building Society v Flegg
Unsuccessful overreaching
Bank bound by wife’s BI under trust. only money to one legal owner (H)
Williams & Glyns Bank v Boland