3 - Platform Strategies Flashcards
The 3-step procedure for managing network effects:
- Actors - identify economic agents who want to interact and convince them to become users.
- Linkage - Figure out how the participation of some users creates (or destroys) value for other users of the platform
3- Leverage - Evaluate the relative strengths of the various network effects in order to activate them as effectively as possible.
Input force vs output force:
Input force comes from an increase in participation in one group. Output force is the increase in the other group, resulting from the positive CGNE operating through the platform.
What is the objective in the leverage step?
To maximize output force (that will depend on the strength of the CGNE) and minimize the effort needed to exert the input force. So the RULE is to select the group with largest output force in relation to its input force (ratio) and start with this group.
What is an example of the leverage step, i.e., maximizing output force? (hint: Primark, night clubs etc)
In a shopping mall it can be good to attract a flagship store like Primark or HM because this will attract more consumers, and when consumers are present, other stores want to establish in the mall as well –> positive loop.
And for night clubs - attract women first.
BUT the input force is typically more costly, ex costly to get Primark into the mall and you need to attract women with discounts.
What affects the cost of attracting the input?
Depends on the input’s:
- outside options (affects price elasticity)
- stand-alone benefits that you offer (that is not affected by the network size)
- WGNE - if there are high WGNE it’s easier to attract.
- marginal costs -choose the input group with the lowest cost.
What is super important when launching a platform?
To create and manipulate the EXPECTATIONS because if no one believes this platform will have users, no one will join - null equilibrium. But if sufficiently amount of people believe in it, you might be able to attract the critical mass and reach the high equilbrium.
Marquee strategy.
Attract users with large CGNE, for example Primark in a mall or a famous DJ on a festival.
- Disadv = costly.
Solving chicken egg - Strategy of offering high stand-alone value:
Provide value to users even if no one else is on the platform. Ex DVD player in the Blu-Ray product.
Commitment strategy:
Platforms can make large upfront investments to signal that it’s safe for a group to join the platform. This is common if the users face high switching costs. Ex Microsoft’s launch of the Xbox - committed to spend a lot on promoting the Xbox and sell it at a low price.
Divide-and-conquer pricing strategy:
Two-sided platforms can set diff prices for each group. Divide = “buy” the participation of one group. Conquer = make the other group pay to interact.
How can the platform set prices to ensure that all joins the platform in the Divide and conquer strategy?
Since multiple equilibria is possible where there is both (0,0) and (Ns, Nb), the platform must make sure that (0,0) does not occur. So they have to set prices so that all buyers join even if no sellers join and vice versa. If they can attract one of the group with certainty, they can then raise the price for the other group. They have to choose one “subsidy side” and one “money side”.
In which 4 scenarios is the platform more likely to overcome the chicken-and-egg problem in the divide-and-conquer strategy?
- Stronger total CGNE (high Betas and Ns).
- Larger intrinsic benefits (r)
- Smaller outside options (small u’s).
- Lower marginal costs (small c’s).
Why is observability of the divide-and-conquer strategy important?
Because if the platform chooses to subsidize buyers, the sellers must know that buyers are subsidized, otherwise they will not expect a high Nb and hence the value and attractiveness for the sellers to join (and pay their fee) will not be worth it.
What is a likely outcome of two firms COMPETING with the divide and conquer strategy? (i.e. undifferentiated platforms)
It is likely that they pressure the prices down so much that they drive profits in the market down to zero –> hence only one platform will manage –> the market tips in favor of a single platform.
(also more likely to tip when network effects are strong, just as with the one-sided platforms).
Give example of piggyback strategy (that you tap onto existing network)
For ex what Paypal did on Ebay, they started offering their payment services on Ebay, and then they could expand because the network had reached its critical mass.
Describe the strategy “focus on narrow market”
You start in a small market where you know you can easily build a network. Ex a certain region. Then when it has proven successful, it’s easier to expand.