3. Other grounds Flashcards
Kaloft v Municipality of Billund
obesity can qualify as disability
and EU test is similar to UK (UK will probs say it is too)
Akerman Livingston v Aster
4 step test for objective justification (for ID arising from disability)
- objectively sufficiently important to justify limiting a fundamental right
- measure rationally connected to objective?
- means more than necessary to achieve objective?
- disadvantage caused to C disproportionate to aim pursued?
Archibold v Fife
failed to offer E different job after disability
- REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION is required
- should offer job and waive interview
- no particular skills were required for the job
Firstgroup v Paulley
SC held bus driver must intervene if prams do not move for wheelchairs
- no need to eject parent (not reasonable)
- but if parent refuses to move, bus can stop until parent moves
Grainger v Nicholson
STRONG ENVIRONEMNTAL VIEWS = BELIEF
- relatively comprehensive set of moral beliefs
- sufficiently serious
EHRC Code of Practie
for belief
genuinely held
not opinion/viewpoint
weight/substantial part of behaviour
level of cogency/seriousness/cohesion/importance
worthy of respect in democratic society, compatible with human dignity
no conflict with fundamental rights
Age Concern
mandatory retirement rules = okay if proportionate (ECJ)
BUT high burden of proof to show legitimacy of aim relied on (e.g. labour market)
Seldon v Clarkson
forced to retire under partnership deed
-DD?
objectively justified
- to justify: must be legitimate aims in public interest NOT just to one company
- ECJ: aim of business planning and retention = legitimate (facilitates inter-generational fairness and dignity)
Petersen
68 mandatory retirement of dentists =potentially justifiable
aim: competence of dentists
- NOT justified because only applies to public sector
AIM: financial stability of system
- CAN be justified and proportionate because limits increase number of dentists in healthcare service
Azmi v Kirklees
face veil not allowed (no face veils allowed)
- NO DD (not because she was Muslim, but because she wore a headscarf)
- NO ID (disadvantage for muslims but OJ, evidence it impaired communication with children)
Ladele v Islington
refused to perform CP
- not DD (not because she was christian but because she didn’t do the civil partnerships)
- NO ID (objectively justified, public servants perform public role and can’t choose who they marry)
- need to discharge duty to all public