3- Other Forms of Dispute Resolution Flashcards
What are tribunals?
Forums used instead of courts for deciding certain types of disputes. Less formal than courts.
How do tribunals operate?
Operate alongside the court system and are an important part of legal system
Began as a method of enforcing entitlement to certain social rights after introduction of welfare state.
Going to court isn’t an option for the parties in tribunal cases, tribunal must be used instead of court proceedings.
What is the role of tribunals?
To enforce rights which have been granted through social and welfare legislation such as:
- Right to mobility allowance
- Right to payment if one is made redundant from work
- Right not to be discriminated against bc of one’s sex, race, disability or age
- Right of immigrants to have a claim for political asylum heard.
How are tribunals organised?
- First tier tribunal
- Upper tribunal
- Court of Appeal
- Supreme Court
Explain the first tier tribunal
600,000 cases/year
200 judges
3.600 lay members
Cases here heard by a tribunal judge
In some cases 2 non-lawyers will sit to make the decision. They will have expertise in the area (ex: medically qualified)
In Employment Tribunals, 1 person is usually from an employers organisation.
How many chambers does a first tier tribunal have?
7:
- Social Entitlement Chamber (child support)
- Health, education and social care chamber (mental health, special education needs)
- War pensions and Armed Forces Compensation Chamber
- General Regulatory Chamber
- Taxation Chamber
- Land, Property and Housing Chamber
- Asylum and Immigration Chamber
How many chambers does the upper tribunal have?
4:
- Administrative Appeals Chamber (hears appeals from 1st 3 first tier tribunal chambers)
- Tax and Chancery Chamber
- Lands Chamber
- Asylum and Immigration Chamber
What are the advantages of tribunals?
- Cheapness- applicants encouraged to represent themselves- no costs associated with court hearings
- Quick hearings: Most tribunal hearings are very short and can be dealt with in 1 day
- Informality- parties usually represent their own cases and most cases heard in private
- Expertise- Experts in the type of case heard sit to hear the case with tribunal judge
What are the disadvantages of tribunals?
Lack of funding- Legal aid funding not available- problem if the other side uses a lawyer (legal aid available if case involves human rights)
More formal than ADR- Place is unfamiliar and procedure confusing for individuals, who won’t make their point clear sometimes
Delay- Can be delays in getting a hearing
Use of non-lawyers makes it difficult bc they sit part time and in cases that take several days proceedings can be spread for weeks or even months.
What are the two major forms of dispute resolution alternative to the civil courts?
Tribunals and ADR
What are the 2 main types of ADR?
Negotiation and mediation
What is negotiation?
Type of ADR. Process of trying to come to an agreement
What is mediation?
Type of ADR. Using neutral person in a dispute to help parties come to a compromise solution
- Mediator consults with both parties to find common ground
- Offers will be carried between each party
- Mediator does not express their own views, they act as facilitators
- Important in family matters. A Meditation Information Assessment Meeting (MIAM) has to be attended.
What are the adv and disadv of negotiation?
ADVANTAGES
- Private, quick and cheap
- If no agreement, a solicitor can be instructed to negotiate a settlement
- Lawyers can continue to negotiate on behalf of clients even if court proceedings have begun
- Gets people talking
- Less stress by the process
DISADVANTAGES
- If a lawyer is involved, there is a cost
- Negotiations can go on longer if a lawyer is involved
- Some disputes drag on for years only to end in an agreed settlement ‘at the door of the court’ on the morning of trial.
What are the adv and disadv of mediation?
ADVANTAGES
- Parties in control of mediation process
- Decision based on commercial common sense and compromise
- Easier to continue to do business in the future
- Avoids adversarial conduct in the courtroom and winner/loser dispute
DISADVANTAGES
- Mediation only suitable if there is hope of cooperation between parties
- Not compulsory