3. Nature Of Law: Law And Morality Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Gillick v West Norfolk 1986

A

Mother civil case against doctor prescribing her daughter contraceptives. Lost at House of Lords. Highlighted the rights of young people to make decisions regarding medical treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What’s “Gillick competent” about?

A

Children being able to make decisions about themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the approaches to law?

A

Hebraric
Greek
Thomist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the hebraric approach?

A

10 commandments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Greek approach?

A

Law based on reason and natural order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Thomist approach?

A

St Thomas Aquinas - natural law which is part of moral law can be discovered by exercising rational thought. Everything else by scripture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Wolfenstein Committee Report 1957

A

Looked at how law should reflect morality on homosexuality and prostitution.

Law should preserve public order and decency and safeguard against exploitation… The law should not intervene in private lives further than necessary to carry out above.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What did Lord Devlin believe?

A

Law and morality went hand in hand.

Public morality should be ascertained by a jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brown 1994

A

Defendants had committed various sadomasochistic acts that resulted in injury.

Deemed unlawful by House of Lords to protect public from immoral acts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Wilson 1996

A

Defendant used hot knife to brand wife’s bum.

Acquitted as no different to tattooing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What would Professor Hart say?

A

Unnecessary for law to act in “immoral” cases as society will not fall. Morality changes so shouldn’t be put into law.

Law is made of primary and secondary rules. Primary are existing rules of a given group. Secondary is concerned with procedure.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What’s Professor Dworkin’s view?

A

Rules and principles. Rules are dogmatic whereas principles are guidelines - a reason to make an arguement in one direction but not a decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly