3. Multiparty Litigation Flashcards
When may multiple plaintiffs sue together as co-plaintiffs?
When their claims:
- Arise from the same transaction / occurrence
AND
- Raise at least one common question
Why would a court force a nonparty into the case?
Because the non-party is necessary
Who’s a necessary party that a court might order to join a case?
An absentee (A) who meets any of these tests:
- Without A, the court cannot accord complete relief among existing parties (worried about multiple suits); OR
- A’s interest may be harmed if he is not joined (practical harm); OR
- A claims an interest that subjects a party (usually D) to a risk of multiple obligations.
Are joint tortfeasors ever necessary?
No
When is the joinder of a necessary party feasible?
- There is PJ over you and
- Joining you will not goof up diversity jurisdiction (the court determines whether you would come in as a P or a
D to see if bringing you in will goof up diversity).
What happens if a necessary party cannot be joined (e.g., no PJ over you)?
The court must do one of two things:
- Proceed without you, or
- Dismiss the entire case
Impleader
D is bringing in someone new. The new party is the third-party defendant (TPD).
If you have an impleader claim, must you assert it in this case?
No
Steps for impleading the TPD in the pending case:
- D files a third-party complaint naming the TPD; and
2. Serve process on the TPD. (So must have PJ over TPD.)
After TPD is joined, may plaintiff assert a claim against TPD?
Yes, if the claim arises from the same T/O as the underlying case.
After TPD is joined, may TPD assert a claim against plaintiff?
Yes, if the claim arises from the same T/O as the underlying case.
P (MO) sues D (KS) in federal court for $100,000, invoking diversity. D impleads TPD (MO) for indemnification of the full $100,000. Is there SMJ over the impleader claim?
Yes, because it invokes diversity
Intervention
Here, the nonparty brings herself into the case. She chooses to come in either as P (to assert a claim) or as D (to defend a claim). The court may realign her if it thinks she came in on the “wrong” side. Application to intervene must be “timely.”
Initial requirements for a class action suit:
- Numerosity: Too many class members for practicable joinder.
- Commonality: There is some issue in common to all class members, so resolution of that issue will generate answers for everybody in one stroke.
- Typicality: Rep’s claims are typical of those of the class; and
- Representative adequate: The class representative will fairly and adequately represent class.
A class action case must fit the case within one of three types:
TYPE 1: “Prejudice”: class treatment necessary to avoid harm (prejudice) either to class members or to the non-class party.
TYPE 2: Class seeks an injunction or declaratory judgment because D treated the class alike.
TYPE 3: “Damages”: (1) common questions predominate over individual questions; AND (2) class action is the superior method to handle the dispute.