3 - Mens Rea Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is mens rea

A

the guilty mind - the intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Must be an MR for ever AR

A

Clifford v dpp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

subjective mr preferred

A

dpp v murray

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

clifford v dpp

A

probability and forseeability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

clifford v dpp test

A

recent subjective test for mr in ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

negligence - is below standard of behaviour

A

dpp v cullagh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

reasonable accident is up to jury

A

r v lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

proving mr is subjective - but can make inferences from subjective facts

A

r v g 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

STRIC LIABILITY MR (5 PRINCIPLES)

1) - PRESUMPTION THAT THE LEGISLATION INTENDED MENS REA

A

DPP v Roberts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

STRIC LIABILITY MR (5 PRINCIPLES)

2) V STRONG PRESUMPTION FOR ‘TRULY CRIMINAL OFFENCES’

A

Gannon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

STRIC LIABILITY MR (5 PRINCIPLES)

3) CAN BE REBUTTED IS STRATUTE IMPLIES ABILITY

A

B v DPP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

STRIC LIABILITY MR (5 PRINCIPLES)

4) Can be rebutted if statute concerned with public interest

A

R v Brockley

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

STRIC LIABILITY MR (5 PRINCIPLES)

5) Words in statute suggest MR is required

A

DPP v Behan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Honest and Reasonable mistake

CC v Ireland (2006)

A

no defence for strict liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ar/mr

coincidence of mr/ar must be a continuing act

A

Fagan v met police commissioner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

corpse rule

r v le brun

A

will give rise to coincidence of ar/mr if corpse rule is applied - e.g burying a body after a accidental murder will imply murder