3- Law & Justice Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the meaning of justice?

A

It can be described simply by a syonym such as fairness, equality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 3 theories of justice?

A
  1. Distributive justice
  2. Utilitarianism
  3. Social justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is distributive justice? What philosophers have added to this theory?

A

Theory concerned with the fair allocation of the benefits (money, property…) and responsibilities (taxes…) of life.

Philosophers including these added to this view:

  1. Aristotle
  2. Thomas Aquinas
  3. Karl Marx
  4. Chaim Perelman
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Aristotle add to the theory of distributive justice?

A

Ancient Greek philosopher

He argued that a just state will distribute its wealth on the basis of merit, according to the person’s contribution to society.

This is a proportionate system where the worthiest, rather than the neediest, receive the greatest share.

Following his argument, to allocate resources on the basis of people’s needs would be unjust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Thomas Aquinas add to the theory of distributive justice?

A

13th century theologian

He based his doctrine on natural law and argued that distributive justice is governed by ‘due proportion’.

This means that people receive what they are due in accordance with their merit, rank and need.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Karl Marx add to the theory of distributive justice?

A

One of the founders of communism

He developed a model of distributive justice embodied in his slogan ‘from each according to his ability, to each according to his need’. This represents 2 principles of the ideal of communism:

  1. Each will contribute to the common wealth to the maximum of their ability.
  2. Each will receive according to their need, regardless of their personal contributions to the common wealth.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did Chaim Perelman add to the theory of distributive justice?

A

He concluded that justice cannot be studied logically, as each attempt to define it is based upon a person’s subjective values.

He saw 6 possible models of distributive justice, including ‘to each according to his merits’, ‘to each according to his needs’, and ‘to each equally’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is utilitarianism?

A

Theory of justice developed in the 19th century from the writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What did Jeremy Bentham add to the theory of utilitarianism?

A

He argued that the more an action increases overall happiness, the more valuable it is, and the more it decreases happiness, the more reprehensible.

Maximising happiness is the object of justice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did John Stuart Mill add to the theory of utilitarianism?

A

He argued that justice includes respect for the people, property and rights, as well as the need for good faith and impartiality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism?

A

The theory of utilitarianism has developed since Bentham and Mill:

ACT UTILITARIANISM: The rightness of an act is judged in isolation to see whether it adds or subtracts from the sum of human happiness.
Ex: Where someone drives a car at 130 m.p.h. on an empty motorway, the sum of human happiness is increased bc individual happiness increases and you hurt no one.

RULE UTILITARIANISM: The rightness of an act is judged according to whether the sum of human happiness would be increased if everyone acted in the same way.
Ex: If all car owners drove along the same stretch of motorway at the = speed at the = time, an accident would probably occur, resulting in pain and misery: the sum of human happiness would decrease.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is social justice?

A

Theory of justice concerned with equal justice in all aspects of society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which two theorists contributed to the theory of social justice?

A

John Rawls

Robert Nozick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does John Rawls argue?

A

SOCIAL JUSTICE THEORY

  • Described justice as fairness
  • He argued that 2 basic principles of justice should be evident within society:
    1. Each person should have an equal right to basic liberties compatible with similar liberties for others. This includes freedoms such as the freedom of speech and association.
    2. Socio-economic inequalities may exist, but only:
      - Where they benefit the least advantaged in society
      - Provided all positions are open to everyone

In his ideal society, a surgeon would be able to earn several times the average wage, live in a large house and drive a luxury car bc his work benefits the disadvantaged members of society, provided anyone with similar skills could have the opportunity to pursue that path.

In essence, he promoted a rights-based system where basic human rights such as freedom of speech could not be interfered with. This opposes utilitarians, for they might allow individual freedoms to be sacrificed for the common good.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does Robert Nozick argue?

A

SOCIAL JUSTICE THEORY

  • Developed an entitlement theory of justice, which consisted of 3 principles:
    1. Principle of justice in acquisition (how property is acquired)
    2. Principle of justice in transfer (how property can change hands)
    3. Principle of rectification of justice (dealing with injustices arising from the acquisition or transfer of property).

He places no limits upon private ownership- property justly acquired may not be appropriated just to reduce inequalities. This is a free-market, libertarian form of justice.

He argues state interference should be kept to a minimum to achieve a just society. The emphasis is on protecting individual rights, especially property.

HIs theory in practice can be seen in the privatisation of state-owned facilities and making the individual more responsible for their own welfare.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What 3 types of justice are there?

A
  1. Procedural
    - concerned with making/implementing laws fairly
  2. Corrective justice
    - when the law restores the balance of interests
  3. Substantive justice
    - the content of the law is just
17
Q

How is the law just in procedural justice?

A
  1. Everyone in the UK has access to the law (Legal Aid).
  2. In criminal proceedings, anyone arrested and taken to the police station is entitled to free legal advice.
  3. Legal aid is available in family cases involving domestic abuse.
18
Q

How does the law NOT ACHIEVE justice in procedural justice?

A
  1. The changes made by the Legal Aid Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 has reduced the availability of legal aid, especially in cases relating to ‘social welfare law’.
  2. Many firms can no longer afford to offer legal aid, especially in criminal law.
  3. Access to law isn’t effective as those with less means may be denied justice.
19
Q

How is the law just in corrective justice?

A
  1. In criminal law, the imbalance between D and the state is restored by considering the aim of sentencing, as well as mitigating/aggravating factors.
  2. In civil & contract law, awards of damages are just as they are awarded according to the merits of the claim, and not to the harm suffered (concept of proportionality).
  3. The availability of appeals achieves justice.
  4. The Criminal Cases Review Commission was established to review cases of those it feels have been wrongly convicted criminal offences, or unfairly sentenced.
20
Q

How does the law NOT ACHIEVE justice in corrective justice?

A
  1. In general, justice is served by the criminal process, but individual cases may expose a lack of justice.
  2. Jeffrey v Black (1978): Police conducted illegal search of a flat where they found drugs. The court held that the evidence should not be excluded just because it had been obtained illegally.
  3. Some people serve prison sentences for crimes they didn’t commit (Birmingham Six/ Guildford Four).
  4. Public funding for bringing miscarriages of justice to the attention of appeal courts is limited.
21
Q

How is the law just in substantive justice?

A
  1. The principle of proportionality generally governs the sentencing practice of judges and magistrates. This satisfies our expectations that the more serious the offence, the harsher the sanction imposed.
  2. Society agrees that imposing life sentences on killers is just.
  3. Judges might impose a reduced tariff: R v Inglis (2010)- 9-year-tariff period, mother had killed her suffering son.
  4. The partial defences to murder and defences such as automatism show an understanding that not all premeditated killing is equally culpable.
22
Q

How does the law NOT ACHIEVE justice in substantive justice?

A
  1. Some murderers are viewed as worse than others, but the mandatory life sentence doesn’t allow for proportionality and may lead to harsh decisions (Cocker (1989: D suffocated his terminally ill wife, who was in much pain)).
  2. The law gives better treatment to those who kill while suffering diminished responsibility/loss of control than it does to those whose free will is overpowered by an external threat (duress not available for (attempted) murder- R v Gotts (1991)).
23
Q

What are the 2 principles of natural justice?

A
  1. COURTS MUST BE- AND BE SEEN TO BE- IMPARTIAL
    • Judges should have no personal interest in the case (Pinochet case (1998)).
  2. PARTIES MUST HAVE A FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT/ANSWER THEIR CASE/OPPONENT’S CASE
    • In Ridge v Baldwin (1964) the HoL ruled that the decision by a police authority to dismiss its chief constable without a personal hearing was contrary to natural justice.
24
Q

What is the purpose of the rules natural justice?

A

The rules of natural justice are designed to protect the interests of individuals against arbitrary decisions.
- The original decision may have been correct, but it was unreliable because it
breached these principles.