(3) Kantian Ethics Flashcards
Definition: moral law
Binding moral obligations
Definition: maxims
Another word for moral rules, determined by reason
Definition: duty
Duties are created by the moral law, to follow it is our duty. The world deontological means duty-based ethics
Definition: summum bonum
The highest, most supreme good
Definition: the good will
A person of good will is a person who makes decisions according to the moral law
Definition: categorical imperative
An unconditional moral obligation that is always binding irrespective of a persons inclination or purpose
Definition: hypothetical imperative
A moral obligation that applied only if one desires the implied goal
Definition: kingdom of ends
An imagined future in which all people act in accordance to the moral law
What does the objective moral law tell us?
- what we ought to do, irrespective of consequence
- moral actions are about duty, action is right or wrong in itself
The application of the good will
- in accordance to duty
- I must do something not for my personal gain, but because it is the right thing to do
- emotions must not drive us
Kant’s specific duties to ourselves and others
- strive for self perfection
- purse a greater good
- freedom
- be truthful
- avoid drunkenness
- not to commit suicide
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic
The Hypothetical Imperative
- command conditional on desired result
- behaviour for an end
- Kant says we should look at the moral law which binds to us unconditionally
The Categorical Imperative
- moral knowledge is categorically, if truth telling is right, then we should always do it
- our actions do not take into consideration the telos, deontological
- universalised
How we perceive the moral law
- how we morally decide is linked to how we make sense of the world
- known through reason, not sense experience
Knowledge at first hand, before sense perception and experience
- a priori
- independent of experience, eg. Use of maths as you do not need physical objects to count
- moral knowledge comes from within
Analytic Statments
- predicate belongs to the subject
- judgements of clarification-
- a priori
Synthetic Statements
- need additional information, a posteriori
- judgement of amplification, adds new knowledge
- may be true or false
How Kant views analytic and synthetic statments
- looking at what someone does, does not tell you their behaviour is right or wrong
- moral propositions are synthetic
- moral knowledge comes from reason, a priori synthetic