3 Interview & advice Flashcards
What should be considered in advising a suspect before an interview?
Disclosure
Evidence
Argent
Defence
DISCLOSURE - what does accused have right to be see?
- custody record COP C 2.4
2 first description of ID witness
DISCLOSURE - case law
R v Roble - no AI where so little disclosure that solicitor can’t usefully advise suspect
EVIDENCE - approach
- state what P must prove
- list what evidence currently exists & what further evidence would be needed for all the elements to be present
- form a view as to how strong case is against suspect
EVIDENCE - case law
R v HOWELL - absence of WRITTEN statement from complainant is NOT a good reason for silence (providing adequate ORAL disclosure of complaint given)
ARGENT - relates to
condition & circumstances surrounding suspect
ARGENT- factors
STREAMS Sobriety Tiredness Reason for fear Experience Age Mental health State of health
ARGENT - sample answer
There are no reasons with the Argent criteria justifying advising X to remain silent. He is sober, mature, experienced and capable of answering questions
DEFENCE - example
X says that he was acting in self-defence when attacked by Y
When would you advise a client to answer questions?
- when they have a defence
- if G - persuade police to administer caution
- if NG - persuade police to take no further action
When would you advise a client to remain silent?
- police has little evidence
- inadequate disclosure
- condition & circumstances warrant it
- if accused cannot answer some questions (e.g. guilty of some of offences)
When would you advise a client to hand in a prepared statement?
- raise facts of defence but avoid stress of interview (if client wouldn’t do well in interview)
- raise facts of defence, but control evidence
BENEFITS no comment/ prepared statement
- control of info
- protect from self-incrimination
- no poor/damaging account
BENEFITS answering Qs
- avoid AI
2. admissions - mitigation