3 - Civil War and Foreign Relations 1918-1924 Flashcards
Why did non-Bolshevik parties oppose the Bolsheviks by 1918?
The Bolsheviks were despised as they:
- crushed the constituent assembly
- outlawed other parties.
Non-Bolshevik parties would NOT accept absolute rule by a minority party
Who was the civil war between? (colours)
- Reds
- Whites
- Greens
How did the Bolsheviks present the struggle?
They presented the stuggle as a class war
What was the real nature of the struggle? (not as a ‘class war’ as depicted by Bolsheviks)
It involved more than just a ‘class war’;
- It gave Russia’s national minorities, e.g. Ukrainians, a cover to establish their independence
- Aso provided a cover to settle personal vendettas (e.g. villages were divided against each other)
- fighting was simply a desperate struggle for food (creating initial military opposition to Bolsheviks)
Give 2 examples of the hunger crisis in Petrograd, just before the civil war
- In March 1918, bread ration in Petrograd reached its lowest allocation of 50 grams a day
- By June 1918, workforce in Petrograd shrunk by 60% and overall pop decline from 3mil to 2mil
What did the hunger crisis (1918) show about the decree of Worker-control (1917)?
It showed that the decree of worker-control was ineffective
What ‘white’ units started to appear during the civil war?
- SR’s established anti-Bolshevik Volga ‘republic’ at Samara
- White ‘volunteer army’, led by General Denikin, was formed in Southern Russia from Tsarist Loyalists and outlawed Kadets
- In Estonia, another ex-Tsarist,General Yudenich, formed white army of resistance
- In Ukraine, Baron Wrangle led ‘Caucasus Volunteer army’ against Bolsheviks
Why was there fighting between Czechoslovakian troops and Local Soviets, during the civil war?
There was fighting as:
- 40,000 Czechoslovakian troops aimed to rejoin allies in Vladivostok, in hope of winning support for independent czechslovakia
- Local Soviets challenged troops and fighting pursued alng the trans-Siberian railway
What were Green weaknesses that contributed to their downfall?
Their limited aims for national independence for particular regions meant that they never formed a common front to challenge the Reds
What were White weaknesses that contributed to their downfall?
- The various white armies fought as separate detachments
- Apart from their obvious desire to overthrow Bolsheviks, they were not bound together by a single aim
- They were unwilling to sacrifice individual interests in order to form a united anti-Bolshevik front. This allowed Reds to defeat white armies separately
- In rare cases where whites did work together, they were too widely scattered geographically to be able to mount a sustained attack on the Reds
- Whites became too reliant on supplies from abroad, which hardly arrived in sufficient quantities, ar right place/time. This also meant that Reds could accuse them of being in league with the foreign interventionists
- They lacked leaders of quality of Trotsky
What were Red strengths that contributed to their victory?
- They remained in control of a concentrated central area of Western Russia, that they were able to defend by maintaining inner communication and supply lines
- Administrative centres of Russia, Petrograd and Moscow, remained in their control
- Reds kept control of railway network
- Reds had control over industrial centres. This gave them access to munitions and resources unavailable to whites
- Red Army was well led by Trotsky
What was Trotsky role during the civil war?
He was War Commissar
What were some of Trotsky actions, that helped the Bolsheviks win the civil war
- He banned independence of trade unions, so workers were brought under same discipline as soldiers. (this helped him build red army)
- Supervised development of new fighting force from his train, motivating them (due to his belief in the importance of morale and dedication)
- He enlisted large numbers of ex-tsarist officers to train the rank and file into efficient soldiers (attaching political commissars as a precaution)
- Strict discipline: Imposed death sentence for desertion or disloyalty. Used customary forms of ranks and address with soldiers
Give evidence to show that Trotskys role in the war was successful
- Within 2 years, he turned an unpromising collection of tired Red Guard veterans and raw recruits into a formidable number of 3 million men
- Political commissars were so successful that they were attached to all gov. departments under Lenin
- Throughout struggle, Reds were sustained by driving sense of purpose instilled in them by Trotsky
Who Trotsky conscript as recruits?
He conscripted:
- Anyone whos political/social background suggested fighting ability. They were formed into labour battalions behind the lines, digging trenches, loading ammo and pulling heavy guns
- Peasants (werent very reliable)
- Workers (VERY reliable and were referred to defenders of the revolution for their work)
How did Trotsky justify the severity of the Reds methods
He used the slogan ‘everything for the front’, referring to the dangers Russia felt on all sides
Were all of the Reds successes achieved by coercion?
No, some idealists saw Red methods as necessary in creating Proletarian world
How strong were the Red Army in comparison to other European armies at the time?
Not very strong: They were short of equipment and expertise, and within Russia, they soon came to outstrip its white opponents in its efficiency and sense of purpose