3 CERTAINTIES - INTENTION Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What are the alternatives to intending a trust

A

Gift
Charge
Bank Account
Sham Device

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a charge?

A

Similar to a trust, allows person access to certain value from a fluctuating pool

Doesn’t grant right to a particular piece of property = different from trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Case for gift

A

MILROy v LORD 1862

- Court keen to point out trusts do not perfect an imperfect gift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Case for sham device

A

MIDLAND BANK v WYATT 1995

  • Trust only created to avoid certain liabilities
  • Husband transferred home into wife’s name to avoid a business liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Case for charge

A

FOLEY v HILL 1848

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cases where courts inferred intention to create a trust

A

PAUL v CONSTANCE 1977
Re KAYFORD 1975
Re FAREPACK 2006

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PAUL v CONSTANCE 1977

A
  • Money is as much mine as it is yours

- Deemed sufficient intention to establish a trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Re KAYFORD 1975

A
  • No words of intention to create trust

- By creating a separate bank account for certain monies there was sufficient intention that it be a trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Re FAREPACK 2006 -> contrasts KAYFORD 1975

A
  • Money put into a Christmas savings scheme by members of public
  • Company went bust and the money was lost
  • Courts (wrongly?) didn’t follow KAYFORD and said there was no intention for it to be a trust so money was gone
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Importance of TITO (No 2) 1977

A

Use of the word trust doesn’t necessarily create one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case for moral obligations being different from trusts?

A

Re ADAMS AND KENSINGTON VESTRY 1884

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Re ADAMS AND KENSINGTON VESTRY 1884

A
  • Use of words ‘in full confidence’ did not make a trust, only moral obligation to do something
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

COMISKEY 1905

A
  • ‘In full confidence’ can create a trust if it is full confidence that rights in property will given to others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

WESTDEUTSCHE LANDESBANK v ISLINGTON LBC 1996

A
  • If it is unconscionable that the legal owner of property denies others rights in the property then intention to create trust can be inferred
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 factors dependent for intention to create trust in WILLS

A
  1. Wording

2. Context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly