3. Budget Deficits & Fiscal Policy: Ricardian Equivalence Flashcards
What does Ricardian equivalence say about issuance of new government bonds?
If the government issues new bonds then it is effectively promising that taxes will be increased in the future
What is the assumed BC for the single representative agent in the economy?
What is assumed to be the only saving instrument in this model?
Ct + qtBt+1 = Wt + Bt - Tt
where W=labour income, T=lump sum taxes
Government bonds: Agents buys them in this period to save for the next and receives the repayments from the ones that they bought last period (assumed due to law of no arbitrage)
In the single representative agents BC, what happens if they buy more bonds (i.e. Bt increases)?
Taxes Tt must also increase in order to compensate for the extra saving
How is the individuals intertemporal budget constraint obtained?
Obtained by imposing a no-Ponzi condition (lim(t→∞)q_(0,t) B_(t+1) ≥0), and then iterating it forward
Explain the meaning of the no-Ponzi condition for the individuals’ budget constraint
The agent will not save more than they need to in terms of bonds
What is the formula for the individuals intertemporal budget constraint?
∑(t=0)^∞ q(0,t) c_t =B_0+ ∑(t=0)^∞ q(0,t) W_(t ) - ∑(t=0)^∞ q(0,t) T_t
Explain the individuals’ intertemporal BC
PV of consumption = the initial value of held bonds + PV of income - PV of taxes that the agent must pay
What assumptions are made for the individuals intertemporal BC?
- The agent lives forever
- No Ponzi
- The only saving instrument is bonds
What does it mean if initial debt in the individuals BC is very high?
It means that the government owes a lot of money and will therefore have to increase taxes in future to repay its debt
How do you obtain the Ricardian Equivalence result?
Explain
(3 points)
Sub the government BC into the individuals BC
In doing this, initial bonds B0 disappears
Hence the amount of bonds held by an agent is irrelevant for consumption
What happens to any interest gained on bonds that individuals buy from the government?
They are later used to fund higher taxes that the government imposes in order to repay its debt
What is the Ricardian equivalence result?
3 large points, Romer 2012
That the present value of the bonds that the household acquires in a period = the present value of the future tax obligation that will occur because the government must finance its debt in some way
Hence the bond does not affect the households consumption behaviour
The household saves the bond with interest until the proceeds are needed to pay the inevitably increased taxes at a later date
Name a few limitations of the Ricardian Equivalence concept?
3 points
- Population turnover: Agents don’t actually live forever (as is assumed in the model), so some of the tax burden is actually borne by future agents (although there are problems with this argument)
- Agents don’t actually choose their consumption optimally (liquidity constraints and different interest rates)
- The path of government expenditures Gt, taxes Tt and debt qt is uncertain
What are the two issues concerning the “finite life” argument against Ricardian equivalence?
- Care for the welfare of descendents can cause a series of individuals to act as one, with the same behaviour over time
- Lifetimes can be considered long enough to allow for Ricardian Equivalence to be a good estimate
Outline the Permanent Income Hypothesis
Households behaviour is affected only by its lifetime BC.
The path of after-tax income doesn’t matter