3. Brief lipid update / effects on cardiovascular health Flashcards
What does the SPRINT study show about the use of thiazide diuretics on top of medications they already take in people with CHD?
Saves 2 lives per 100 people per year
What is the optimal medical therapy in people with CHD?
Intensive lifestyle modification, aspirin, high dose statin e.g. atorvastatin 40-80mg OD, optimal BP control, thiazides are very cheap, assessment for probable T2DM (HbA1c). Aggressive management of blood pressure and lipids improves survival
What are alternative options for people with statin intolerance?
Niacin (no longer available), ezetimibe, plasma exchange (where available), evolucumab - PCSK9 monoclonal antibody
What does PCSK9 do?
Regulates the levels of LDL receptor
Gain of function mutations in PCSK9 will…
reduce LDL receptor levels in the liver, resulting in high levels of circulating LDL and increased susceptibility to CHD
Loss of function mutations in PCSK9 leads to…
Higher levels of LDL receptor, lower LDL cholesterol levels, and protection from coronary heart disease
What happens when you inhibit PCSK9 with monoclonal antibodies?
It can increase the removal of LDL cholesterol from the plasma.
What are the benefits of Evoluocumab?
A study on the benefits of Evolucumab in patients with established CVD showed it significantly and safely decreases major CV events when added to statin therapy, however has no effect on mortality. Benefit was achieved with lowering LDL cholesterol well below current targets.
Who is PCSK9 inhibitor reserved for?
For high risk patients e.g. familial hypercholesterolaemia, statin-intolerant patients -> high net value patients. It is a very expensive drug.
What does the UKPDS study (1977-2007) show about aggressive control of blood glucose?
That it maintains a lower HbA1c through 15 years of follow-up in newly diagnosed T2DM. The effect of intensive treatment on the risk of microvascular events was not apparent until around 9 years after beginning the trial. This shows that, to achieve favourable outcomes later on, blood glucose control must be good from the beginning. In reality it takes about 15 years before the benefits of good blood glucose control become apparent.
Patients who reverted back to poor glucose control quickly reached similar HbA1c values to their counterparts in the conventional management group. However mortality remained low -> legacy effect. So having good blood glucose control, even for a relatively short period of time, has benefits later on.
The Accord and Advance studies looked at the benefits of blood glucose control in people who had had some sort of cardiovascular complication of their diabetes. What did it find?
Accord found that suddenly aggressively controlling the blood glucose of people who have had poor control for decades leads to reduced complications but increased mortality.
Sudden aggressive blood glucose control can precipitate tachycardia and kill patients.
Summarise the DCCT study
Type 1 diabetes, good control improves outcomes
Summarise the UKPDS study
New T2DM put onto good control. 15 years before benefits are seen. Low mortality in both groups (i.e. those who reverted back to poor glucose control vs. those who maintained good glucose control) for 15 years (legacy effect) but the good control group had improved outcomes and lower HbA1c.
Summarise the ACCORD study
take older people who had poor control for a long time, and suddenly massively tighten control (HbA1c=6%): they already had coronary artery disease, so increased unexpected death
Summarise the ADVANCE study
HbA1c=6.5%, reduced death