[3] Agency Flashcards
Who are the principles?
Who are the agents?
Who has more information?
What is the principle-agent problem?
Shareholders (principals) = Owners
Managers (agents) = Employees
Managers have the power to manage day-to-day aspects of the firm.
Managers have more information than the shareholders.
Agency problems occur when managers do not act in the shareholders’ interest.
What inefficiences would occur if managers were paid a fixed salary? [6]
- > reduced effort - low incentive to find and invest in truly valuable (+NPV) projects;
- > perks - take nonpecuniary private benefits anyway (company car, lavish office, meetings in luxury resorts,…)
- > empire building - prefer running large business rather than small ones (may not be +NPV). Results in overinvesting.
- > insufficient disinvestment – reluctance to disinvest, e.g. close loss-making business. Results in overinvesting.
- > entrenching investment - choose investments that require or reward the skills of the existing managers.
- > risk-aversion - try to avoid risk or more risky projects.
Why does the Principle-agent problem not stop at the top?
Top managers are also principals vis-a-vis the rest of the firm (middle managers and other employees).
Top management must try to ensure that middle managers and employees have the right incentives to find and invest in +NPV projects.
What types of incentives are there for managers? 3
Monitoring, Stock-price performance, compensation management
What does monitoring incentive entail?
Whats the issue with it? x2
Monitoring: Agency costs can be reduced by monitoring a manager’s efforts and actions and by intervening when the manager veers off course (shareholders, board of directors, auditors, lenders, takeovers…).
But monitoring also involve costs and diminishing returns…
What is compensation management incentive?
What is it based upon?
compensation plans must be designed to attract competent managers and to give them the right incentives.
The amount of compensation may be less important than how it is structured.
The compensation package should encourage managers to maximize shareholders’ wealth.
Compensation should be based on:
input (managers’ effort) and
output (incomes or value-added from managers’ actions)
Very difficult to monitor the actions (effort) of managers so compensation should be based on output.
What are the trends for manager compensations over time? x3
Since ‘92:
Base salary falling
Bonus roughly the same
Ristricted stocks increasing
What is stock-price performance incentive?
What does it reduce? x2
What are stock options, restricted stock and performance shares?
Capital markets do monitor managers’ actions through the price mechanism (stock prices reflect performance of a firm).
Compensation tied to stock prices (like stock options) do reduce the cost and the need for monitoring.
Most major companies link part of their executive pay to the stock-price performance:
- stock options - give managers the right, but not the obligation, to buy their company’s shares in the future at a fixed exercise price;
- restricted stock - stock that must be retained for several yrs;
- performance shares - shares awarded only if the company meets an earnings or other target.
Major pitfall of Stock-price performance compensation?
Changes in the stock price aren’t necessarily due to the manager/agent and change due to things outside the managers control
4 Reasons why stock price may not reflect manager performance?
- payoffs do not account for stock-price changes relative to the market or to stock prices of other firms in the same industry.
- company’s stock price depends on investors’ expectations of future earnings ⟹ rates of return depend on how well the company performs relative to expectations;
- incentive plans may tempt managers to withhold bad news or manipulate earnings to pump up stock prices;
- stock options can encourage excessive risk-taking (gambling for redemption).
Compensation also depends on….
Compensation depends on accounting measures (accounting profits, earnings, rate of return on investment)
3 Disadvantages of using Absolute Accounting measures?
- managers tempted to pump up short term profits, leaving longer run problems to successors
- Accounting earnings can be biased measures of true profitability (they calculate income differently, using book value, which doesn’t account for opp cost/NPV)
- Growth in earnings does not necessarily mean that shareholders are better off (ie earnings from some projects that do not have +ve NPV)
2 Tech for overcoming the Problems of the Accounting measure of performance:
- Net Return On Investment
- Economic Value Added (Residual Income)
Both of these account for the Cost Of Capital
How to you calculate Net Income?
Sales
less ‘cost of goods sold (including Depreciation)’
less ‘expenses’
then less ‘25% tax’
= net income
Formula to calculate Return on Investment
ROI = Net (or after tax ) Income / Net (depreciated ) book value of Assets