2nd class Flashcards

1
Q

Can you use your naked ear to eavesdrop on conversations?

A
  • YES
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

seizure of a person

A
  • a reasonable person would not feel free to leave and terminate the police encounter.
  • based on an officers application of force (or citizens submission to officers show of authority).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

seizures of property

A
  • some MEANINGFUL INTERFERENCE with the suspects property.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 types of police encounters:

A

1) voluntary/consensual encounter
2) investigative detention
3) arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

voluntary/consensual encounter

A
  • no level of suspicion required, a hunch or less.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

investigative detention

A
  • requires reasonable suspicion (terry stop)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

arrest

A
  • requires PC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can a suspect terminate a consensual encounter?

A

YES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when does a consensual encounter become a seizure?

A
  • handcuffing
  • pointing a firearm at a suspect
  • holding on to personal items
  • using accusatory or threatening language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

facts of Terry vs Ohio:

A
  • involves terry stops and terry frisks
  • you may detain citizens briefly to conduct investigations of criminal activity.
  • you may frisk for weapons if you have suspicion the subject has a weapon.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

reasonable suspicion

A
  • more than a hunch
  • particularized facts that a crime is
    - occurring,
    - has occurred,
    - or is about to occur
  • based on totality of circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what facts establish reasonable suspicion?

A
  • criminal history of suspect
  • BOLO
  • nervousness
  • flight
  • time of day and reaction of suspect
  • victims/witnesses
  • anonymous tips/confidential informants
  • observation of suspects behavior
  • presence in high crime areas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

can force be used during a terry stop?

A

YES, if the force is reasonable and necessary to conduct the detention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how long can you detain a person?

A
  • a reasonable amount of time

- you must use due diligence to either establish PC or release the suspect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how a terry stop can turn into an arrest:

A
  • if its a lengthy detention
  • if the force is out of proportion to the facts
  • if you handcuff and put them in back of patrol car
  • forced movement from one place to another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

when do you perform a terry frisk?

A
  • if you have RS the person is armed and dangerous
17
Q

what can you do during a terry frisk?

A
  • a limited pat down of outer clothing looking for (weapons, hard objects).
  • head to toe
  • areas of immediate control (lunging area)
  • BEWARE: officer is not limited to belt area during frisk
18
Q

what facts give us reasonable suspicion that suspects are PAD?

A
  • bulge in pocket
  • furtive hand movements
  • nature of crime
  • reputation for carrying weapons
  • reputation for violence
  • behavior/words
19
Q

what crimes allow you to terry frisk?

A
  • aggravated assault
  • burglary
  • robbery
  • trafficking drugs/possession with intent/sale
  • any offense involving tools
20
Q

plain touch doctrine

A
  • allows you to seize illegal items that are in plain view during a terry frisk
21
Q

elements of plain touch doctrine:

A
  • requires a lawful frisk
  • items incriminating nature must be immediately apparent based on training and experience.
  • no manipulation to determine incriminating nature