2B - Defences Flashcards
Contributory Negligence is found under what act?
s.1(1) Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945
What is contributory negligence?
It’s a partial defence where the C’s damages are reduced according to the C’s responsibility for their loss
Contributory negligence: what happened in Froom v Butcher?
The driver of a car suffered greater injuries than would have been the case if he was wearing a seat belt. His damages were reduced by 20%
Contributory negligence: What happened in Jayes v IMI (Kynoch) Ltd
There was a 100% reduction in damages when the C lost a finger when cleaning a machine. The employers had provided a guard, however, the C admitted that he had pulled this off when he cleaned the machine
Contributory negligence: What happened in Sayer v Harlow
C’s compensation was reduced by 25% for trying to climb out of a locked toilet by standing on the loo roll holder
Consent: What does volenti non fit injura mean?
no injury is done to the one who consents to the risk
What kind of defence is consent?
It’s a complete defence which means that the C will not receive a remedy
Consent: In order to prove the defence is must be shown that the C…
- Knew of the precise risk, AND
2. Voluntarily accepted the risk by free choice
Consent: What happened in Stermer v Lawson
Defence failed as the C hadn’t been properly shown how to use the motorbike and so didn’t appreciate the risks - precise risk
Consent: free choice
Consent must be given freely. There must be an absence of anything that interferes with free choice
Consent: What happened in Smith v Baker
C was an employee who worked on a railway line. For several weeks a crane had been swinging material overhead. C was injured and D tried to argue the due to the C continuing to work he had consented to the risk of the injury. Court rejected this as simply knowing of the risk didn’t amount to consent especially where the C had little choice but to continue to work as he needed the job
Consent: Person is under a duty to act
Where a person is under a duty to act, eg for his job (Ogwo v Taylor) and is then injured due to the D’s negligence then content will not be a defence, as the C had no choice but to act
Remedy: Damages - aim of damages
The most common remedy is damages which aims to compensate the C and put them in the position that they would have been in had the tort not occurred, as far as money can do. However, they must not gain from their losses
Remedy: Damages - C has a duty to mitigate their losses
They must take reasonable steps to prevent further deterioration in the condition of any damaged property
Remedy: Damages - Two heads of damages
- Special damages
2. General damages