2.6.3 Supply Side Policies Flashcards
What are the two types of supply side policies?
- market based = demand + supply, price mechanisms to allocate resources, less govt intervention = promotes the use of the markets to allocate resources e.g. improving incentives
- interventionist = govt intervention e.g. regulation, govt spending + taxation, subsidies
Example of an interventionist supply side policy?
- the government increases its spending on the big three e.g. education, health + infrastructure
- e.g. infrastructure = roads, rails, airport etc
- in the longer run increases LRAS
- also causes a rightward shift of AD in the first instance —> multiplier effect —> increase in real gdp
Example of market based supply side policies
- deregulation = reduce barriers for more competitive markets
- privatisation = increase in competition e.g. success of telecommunications industry
- reduce protectionism = encourage international trade, increased competition in international markets
- reduce monopolies = CMA investigates firms acting in an anti-competitive manner
How does deregulation improve competition?
- allows more businesses to enter the market = makes market more contestable = lower barriers to entry
- competition gives producers an incentive to produce better quality goods or at a lower cost so cheaper goods = increased consumer surplus
- more efficient allocation of resources + offers customers more choice
Benefits of competition
- firms have a greater incentive to be more efficient if they are in competitive markets
- incentive to be productive efficient = lower average costs so they can lower prices
- incentive to be allocatively efficient = producing good that consumers want = higher quality, more innovative
What can market based policies aim to do?
- increase competition
- increase incentive
How can a market base policy increase incentives?
- reducing corporation tax = increased incentive for firms to invest in capital goods + encourages FDI
- reducing income tax, reducing benefits = increased incentive for individuals to work, reduces voluntary unemployment
- HOWEVER - increasing incentives can come at the cost of increased inequality
Interventionist policy to improve skills + quality of labour force
- spending on education, training + health = increased productivity in the longer run + improve occupational mobility
- improved training management = organising work + recruitment, provides motivation
- increased number of apprenticeship programmes
Interventionist policy to improve quality of labour EVALUATION
- policy could be costly = increased budget deficit —> in the long run govt May have to increase taxation and/or lower spending = opportunity cost
- impact would depend on the extent to which the training was suitable for preparing people for the workforce = needs to address skills shortages
Market based policies to reform the labour market
- reduce trade union power = reduces ability of workers to negotiate higher wages + therefore wages will be lower than if trade unions are stronger
- labour force may be more flexible with less trade union power due to unions instructing members to only perform roles as defined in contrast = demarcation disputes
- making laws to allow immigration to be easier (especially for professions with skill shortages) = increased supply of skilled workers = fall in equilibrium wage = UK goods more competitive = export led growth
Market based policies to reform the labour market EVALUATION
- could lead to increased income inequality if wages are suppressed while income rise for highest earners
- greater immigration means higher demand for education, health + housing = more govt spending
- more demand for road space = increased congestion e.g. negative externalities
Interventionist policy to improve infrastructure?
- increased govt spending on infrastructure e.g. public transport, roads etc
- improves geographic mobility
- workers have a simpler commute to work = more flexible work force
Disadvantages of interventionist supply side policies
- cost to govt, increased spending on education, health + infrastructure could lead to a budget deficit
- cuts in taxation could lead to lower tax revenue = budget deficit
- policies to encourage FDI will only be impactful in the long run = no immediate benefit
- spending on education + training will also have a time lag until it creates a skilled workforce read to work
Disadvantages of market based supply side policies
- boosts to incentives could lead to more inequality if benefits are cut
- BUT cuts in income tax for basic rate payers or increase in personal allowance + minimum wage could reduce inequality