2.6.3 Supply-side policies Flashcards
Are supply-side policies short-term or long-term?
Long-term.
They have a long time lag.
Aim of supply-side policies?
To expand the productive potential in an economy (by increasing LRAS), or to increase the trend rate of growth.
- Shown by a shift right in the LRAS curve or expansion of PPF.
What do supply-side involve?
Supply-side policies involve making structural changes to the economy to allow its ‘individual parts’ to work more efficiently and more productively. For example, they might do this by helping markets function more efficiently, or creating incentives for firms or individuals to become more productive (or more entrepreneurial).
Types of supply-side policies
- Free market
- Interventionist
Free market supply-side policies
Free market supply-side policies aim to increase efficiency by removing things which interfere with the free market.
Examples of free market supply-side policies
- Tax cuts
- Privatisation
- Deregulation
- Policies to increase labour market flexibility.
Interventionist supply-side policies
Interventionist supply-side policies are usually aimed at correcting market failure.
Examples of interventionist supply-side policies
Government spending on:
- Education
- Subsidies for research and development
- Funding for improvements to infrastructure (e.g. ports than help firms to export their goods)
- Industrial policy (this is policy aimed at developing a particular industry or sector of the economy e.g. through subsidies).
Examples of supply-side policies used to encourage competition in the product market
- Deregulation
- Privatisation
- Contracting services out
Supply-side policies used to incentive firms to invest
Offer tax breaks if they invest their profits back into the business instead of paying dividends to shareholders.
Trade liberalisation
The process of removing or reducing trade barriers, and allowing goods and capital to flow more freely between countries.
Supply-side policies in the capital market
Deregulation of financial markets – e.g. The ‘Big Bang’ of 1986 removed a lot of the traditional ‘restrictive practices’ that were felt to have made British financial markets (e.g. banks and stockbrokers) inefficient.
Supply-side policies in the labour market
- Reducing unemployment benefits
- Reduce (or reform) income tax
- Improve labour market flexibility
- Reduce regulations on firms
- Improve education and training
Benefits of supply-side policies
It makes it easier for a government to achieve its macroeconomic objectives, with fewer conflicts between macroeconomic objectives – which isn’t the case with demand-side policies.
- For example, unemployment should fall as the economy grows and output expands.
- And cost-push inflation should be reduced, as greater efficiencies (and lower costs) are achieved.
- The current account of the balance of payments should also improve because of increased international competitiveness.
Negatives of supply-side policies
- They have a significant time lag - so they can’t be used to fix the economy quickly. E.g. it’ll take many years to reform/improve an education system.
- There can be unintended consequences – e.g. the deregulation of financial markets (starting with the ‘big bang’ in 1986) led to excessive risk-taking in financial markets, which contributed towards the recent recession.
- Supply-side policies can be unpopular and unfair:
1) For example, benefits cuts can lead to the poorest people in society worrying about their ability to cope financially.
2) Greater flexibility in the labour market and trade union reforms could lead to some people having less job security.
So while a government may hope that improved economic performance will lead to greater prosperity overall in the long term, it can be very difficult in the short term to introduce some of these policies.