2.6 Macroeconomic objectives and policies Flashcards
Seven macroeconomic objectives
-control inflation
-economic growth
-reduce unemeployment
-improve the balance of payments
-improve government debt
-improved sustainability
-reduce inequality
how do the government achieve their objectives?
through monetary and fiscal policy
In a recession what do the government do?
They often increase AD to increase employment and economic growth
In a boom what do the government do?
they will decrease AD to decrease inflationary pressures. They may also use supply side policies, which aim to bring about long-term growth
Expansionary policy
aimed at increasing AD to bring about growth
deflationary policy
attempts to decrease AD to control inflation.
Monetary policy
where the central bank or regulatory authority attempts to control the level of AD by altering base interest rates or the amount of money in the economy
Fiscal policy
use of borrowing, government spending and taxation to manipulate the level of aggregate demand and improve macroeconomic performance.
two tools of demand management
-government spending
-taxation
tools of tight fiscal policy
-increase taxation
-decrease government spending
what is tight policy is also known as
contractionary
tools of loose fiscal policy
-decrease taxation
-increase government spending
Impact of tight policy on inflation
-raised taxes leads to a drop in aggregated demand do inflation drops (disinflation), inflation is controlled
Impact of tight policy on economic growth
-dropped demand means firms will produce less, which will reduce output hence less economic growth
Impact of tight policy on unemployment
-as firms are producing less, there won’t be as many jobs avaliable, which will increase the rate of unemployment
Impact of tight policy on increased sustainability
-less produced so therefore less non renewals used making everything more sustainable
Impact of tight policy on government debt
-in short run, deficit will be reduce as taxes increased and government spending reduced.
Impact of tight policy on inequality
-more people are facing inequality, as unemployment has increased. however the gap will be smaller, due to higher taxes and a drop in demand
Impact of tight policy on balance of payments
-improve as exports will increase and imports will decrease.
-drop in demand leads to drop in imports
-In LT exports should increase as exports should become more competitive and therefore increase
Evaluation impact of tight policy on inflation
depends on the type of inflation. demand pull inflation will have a greater impact than cost push
Evaluation impact of tight policy on economic growth
depends on the magnitude of tight policy
Evaluation impact of tight policy on unemployment
ST/LT as in LT workers will be needed, depends on what industry, occupational and geographical mobility
Evaluation impact of tight policy on sustainability
less government subsides due to less money in the circular flow means less investment in green and sustainable projects
Evaluation impact of tight policy on governement debt
In LT government debt will increase as more ar eunemployed and claiming JSA/benefits
Evaluation impact of tight policy on inequality
depends on the magnitude of inflation and unemployment
Evaluation impact of tight policy on balance of payments
imports are inelastic and exports depend on the magnitude of disinflation and determinants on other factors.
Impact of loose policy on inflation
aggregate demand increases, which leads to inflation
Impact of loose policy on economic growth
aggregate demand increases so firms need to produce more hence economic growth
Impact of loose policy on unemployment
as firms need to produce more then they will employ more workers to produce more
Impact of loose policy on government debt
in ST deficit will increase as taxes have been reduce and the government is spending more
Impact of loose policy on inequality
less people are facing inequality as more are employed however the gap is bigger due to inflation
Impact of loose policy on sustainability
more is being produce so more non renewables a re used making it less sustainable
Impact of loose policy on balance of payments
exports will decrease and imports will increase. increase in demand leads to an increased imports. BoP will be negatively impacted.
Budget deficit
when the government spends more money than they receive.
Budget surplus
when the government receives more money than they spend.
Which taxes will the governemnt increase/decrease?
VAT, income tax
Direct taxes
paid directly to the government by the individual taxpayer.
Indirect taxes
where the person charged with paying the money to the government is able to pass on the cost to someone else
problems with fiscal policy
Government spending also impacts LRAS. For example, by cutting government spending to reduce AD, the government may be reducing the quality of education or
spending on research and technology.
-Taxes and spending have an impact on inequality, so some decisions aimed to reduce/increase demand may increase income inequality. They also have an impact
on incentives, for example high taxes reduce incentives.
-The government also has to worry about political issues, for example they may be unwilling to raise taxes in order to reduce demand as this may lead to them being voted out of government
-Expansionary fiscal policy is difficult to undertake during a period of austerity. The government needs to consider the effect of policies on the budget.
-The impact of fiscal policy depends on the multiplier: the bigger the multiplier, the bigger the impact on AD. Classical economists argue that the multiplier is almost zero whilst Keynesian economists argue that it can be large if targeted correctly.
Monetary vs Fiscal
-Monetary policy is useful as the government is able to increase demand without having to increase their spending, which would result in a larger fiscal deficit.
Classicists argue that if demand management is going to be done only monetary policy should be used.
-Fiscal policy can have significant impacts on the supply side of the economy, for example increases in spending on education to increase AD will also increase LRAS.
Moreover, it is more effective at targeting specific groups and reduce poverty, for example by increasing benefits it can increase AD and reduce inequality.
Supply side policies
government policies aimed at increasing the productive potential of the economy and moving the supply curve to the right. Over time, there tend to be supply-side improvements independent of the government, through actions of the private sector such as investment.
Market based policies
policies which are designed to remove anything that
prevents the free market system working efficiently, causing lower output and higher prices. These barriers include those which reduce willingness of workers to take jobs or lead to inefficient production, high prices or a lack of risk-taking.
Interventionist policies
policies designed to correct market failure, for example
the free market under provides education and so the government provides it. Also, firms may only look into the short term and look to maximise short run profits to give
to shareholders instead of investing, so governments may take actions to encourage investment.
Examples of supply side policies
-increase incentives
-promote competition
-reform the labour market
-improve skills and quality of the labour force
-improve infrastructure
Increase incentives
-By increasing the incentive for people to go to work or firms to employ people, the government will increase the size of the workforce and this would mean more goods and services would be produced.
-A reduction in benefits/taxes will increase the opportunity cost of being out of work and mean that people are always better off within work than on benefits. This is why the government have introduced Universal Credit, which
helps to ease the transition into and out of work.
-A reduction in benefits may prevent the poverty/unemployment trap, where low income workers end up in the same or an even worse position after they
gain a new job because of the benefits they lose. The unemployment/poverty trap can also be solved by subsiding workers i.e. lower income workers receive income tax credits instead of paying income tax.
-Moreover, they could encourage parts of the workforce back to work, for example women could be offered free childcare and flexible hours.
Problem with increase incentives
this method is that many people will argue a small change in any tax, for example from 25% to 20%, will have little impact on people’s incentive to work. Reductions of tax on high income earners will lead to more income inequality
and any reduction will mean governments have less revenue so have to decrease spending or borrow more. Reducing benefits will also worsen equality.
Promote competition
-Privatisation, selling nationalised companies to private sectors, or deregulation, reducing restriction on businesses which restrict entry to the market, makes firms
more competitive.
-Competition policy is used to prevent monopolies in the market and make cartels and price fixing agreements illegal. The CMA is the body in the UK which ensures
markets are competitive and the Competition Act (1998) and Enterprise Act (2002) were passed with the same aim.
what is the argument about competition?
The belief is that competition is necessary to make firms efficient as they have to offer a cheaper or better service if there is competition. Free market economists argue that governments have little incentive to cut costs or innovate so nationalised industries are inefficient and causes government failure.