2.5.2 Supply-side policies Flashcards

1
Q

supply side policy definition

A

deliberate actions taken by gov designed to increase LAS of economy (right shift)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

effects of supply side polciies (4)

A
  • increased GDP
  • lower unemployment
  • lower inflation
  • improvememts to CA balence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

difference between supply-side polciies and improvements

A

improvements = firms themselves have desire to increase output - if possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

effects of supply side polciies

increased GDP

A

increased capacity = higher GDP

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

effects of supply side polciies

lower unemployment

A
  • lower income tax
  • reduced welfare benefits
  • deregulation of markets
  • imrpovements in education
  • investment in infastructure
    = all lower it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

effects of supply side polciies

lower inflation

A

higher capacity = AD increase before capacity reached - demand-pull pressures won’t emerge until higher GDP level reached.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

effects of supply side polciies

improvements to CA balence

A
  • downward pressure on prices = UK exports more price competative
  • more productive workforce = lower-priced uk-output
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

free-market supply side policy definition

A

= involves removing barriers that prevent market reaching most efficient equilibrum + allow market to work as freely as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

free-market supply side polciies:

A
  1. income tax cuts and personal incentives.
  2. reduction in trade union power
  3. minimum wage
  4. reduction in umemploymet benefits
  5. reduction in labour protection
  6. zero-hour contracts
  7. privatisation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

free-market supply side polcies

income tax cuts and personal incentives

A

tax cuts = increased incentives
Laffer curve
therefore increase LRAS as reduces frictional and volentary unemployment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

free-market supply side polcies

reduction in trade union power

A

TU use threat of industrial action to increase wage rate higher than free market rate
This pressure and higher cost for firms reduces firms demand for labor = lower employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

free-market supply side polcies

minimum wage

A
  • increases over years may reduce quantity of labour demanded by businesses - policy = reduce or abandon it.
  • minimum wage = reduces frictional + volentary unemployment as makes working more worthwhile.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

free-market supply side polcies

reduction in unemployment benefits

A

makes being unemployed less desireable.
can add to greater levels of pverty and more unequal distribution of income.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

free-market supply side polcies

zero-hour contracts

A

may seem insecure but makes it easier for firms to hire workers only when required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

free-market supply side polcies

privatisation

A
  • theory = moving businesses into private sector increases efficiency as priv businesses pursue max profit.
  • often coupled with deregualtion to increase consumption = lower prices + higher output, AS shifts right
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

interventionist supply-side policies definition

A

designed to increase AS by intervening in more markets - often accomanied by higher targetted gov expenditure.

15
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies: (6)

A
  • education
  • training
  • industrial policy
  • R+D subsides
  • infastructure
  • entrepreneurship
16
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

education

A

reform and greater investment = increase AS due to:
* giving workforce greater set of skills, reducing occupational mobility therefore structrual unemployment.
* increasing quality = increased productivity = increase LRAS

17
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

training

A

increasing quality and quality = increase AS
by: training schemes from gov or subsidies by gov.

18
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

industrial policy

A

focus of changes in legislation affecting the labour market + changing laws in terms of grants given, tax breaks to encourage I, tax and regs.

19
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

R+D subsidies

A

= make breakthroughs that lead to improved productive techniques or tech advances = increase LRAS
done by grants to research institutes.

20
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

infastructure

A

Invest in it, to make ot easier for businesses to operate.
e.g. high speed railways between London and Scotland - easier for business to be conducted throughout UK.

21
Q

interventionist supply-side polcies

entrepreneurship

A
  • make it easier for people to set up their own business or offer assistance to these.
  • reduce ‘red tape’ = fewer administrative + legal burdens to encourage this.
22
Q

what would a successful supply side policy implementation do to the natural rate of unemployment?

A

reduce it

23
Q

factors that lead to fall in natural rate of unemployment:

A
  • education improvements
  • incentives to increase training
  • higher investment
  • lower income tax
  • less benefits
  • subsidising r+D
24
Q

What does a lower rate of natural umemployment mean?

A

means national income can be increased + AD can be increased to higher levels w/ less risk of inflationairy measures emerging.

25
Q

Limitations of supply side policies:

A
  • Tax cuts often favour those with high incomes (e.g. top rate UK from 50% to 45%).
  • Cutting benefits is more likely to increase poverty
  • Reducing the rights of workers may prove unpopular with workers, who make up three-quarters of those of working age.
  • time lag for significant effects
  • The results of their implementation are not easy to measure.
  • They can be very expensive.