2.5 Non-fatal offences against a person Flashcards
Assault
Actus reus
Any act the makes victim fear imidiate infliction of unlawful force
Assault
Mens rea
Intention to create fear, or subjective recklessness
Assault
What sentence does this crime carry
Maximum of 6 months imprisonment
Assault
What type of offence is Assault
Summary offence, only triable in the Magistrates court
Assault
Case illustrating the law
Smith v Woking Police
Assault
Smith v Woking police (1983) facts
D peaked throught a window of a young women’s house, when the women saw him she screamed and phoned the police
Assault
Held in Smith v Woking police (1983)
D was charged with assault as the victim feared ‘immediate’ danger
Assault
Point of law in smith v woking police (1983)
Act doesn’t have to be dangerous, just have to make victim fear danger
Assault
Possible defences for assault
Consent, insanity, automatism, intoxication and self defence
Battery
Define battery
The defendant intentionally or recklesslly applies unlawful force upon the victim
Battery
Actus reus
Application of unawful physical force
Battery
Mens rea
Intention to apply, or recklessness as to whetehr unlawful force will be applied
Battery
What sentence does this crime carry
Maximum of 6 months imprisonment
Battery
What type of offence is Battery
Summary offence, only triable in the Magistrates court
Battery
Case showing ‘recklessness’
R v Pamenter
Battery
Facts of R v Pamenter
D was holding a baby heavily handed, this caused the baby to suffer injuries
Battery
Held in R v Pamenter
Fulfilled the mens rea for battery
Battery
Point of law in R v Pamenter
It’s necessary to establish that D appreciated the risk. It’s not sufficient that he should have foreseen the risk
Battery
Case for ‘application’ (mens rea)
Collins v Willcocks
Battery
Facts of Collins v Willcocks
2 officers thought women was soliciting for prostitution, when she walked away the officers grabbed her arm
Battery
Held in Collins v Willcocks
Officer had committed battery on the women
Battery
Point of law in Collins v Willcocks
Any touching of another person, however slight, may amount to battery
Battery
Defences to battery
Consent, insanity, automatism, intoxication and self defence
ABH s.47
Actus reus
Any assault or battery that causes actual bodily harm
ABH s.47
Mens rea
Intention or recklessness as to the assault or battery
ABH s.47
What are some examples of what amounts to ABH
Psychiatric injury, cutting of hair
- anything that interferes with health or comfort of the victim
ABH s.47
What sentence does this crime carry
Maximum of 5 years imprisonment
ABH s.47
What type of offence is ABH
triable-either-way offence
ABH s.47
Case that illustrates ABH
R v Roberts (1971)
ABH s.47
Facts of R v Roberts
Girl jumped out of a moving car trying to excape the sexual advances of the D. She suffered concussions, bruises and cuts
ABH s.47
Held in R v Roberts (1971)
D had mens rea and actus reus for ABH s.47
ABH s.47
Point of law in R v Roberts (1971)
D’s assault led to actual bodily harm
ABH s.47
Defences applicable to ABH s.47
Consent, Insanity, Automatism, Intoxication and Self defence
Wounding and GBH s.20
Actus reus
Causing unlawful wounding or GBH
Wounding and GBH s.20
Mens rea
intention to cause or recklessness as to causing some harm
Wounding and GBH s.20
What sentence does this crime hold
Maximum of 5 years imprisonment
Wounding and GBH s.20
What type of offence is s.20
Triable-either-way offence
Wounding and GBH s.20
Case that illustrates GBH s.20
R v Savage (1991)
Wounding and GBH s.20
R v Savage (1991) facts
D poured a pint over V’s head in the pub, the glass slipped out of her hand and cut the V’s wrist
Wounding and GBH s.20
Held in R v Savage (1991)
D fulfilled mens rea for s.20
Wounding and GBH s.20
Point of law in R v Savage (1991)
Not necessary to demonstrate the D had mens rea in relation to level of harm inflicted.
- sufficient that intended or could foresee some harm will result
Wounding and GBH s.20
Defences applicable to s.20
Consent, Insanity, Automatism, Intoxication and Self defence
Wounding and GBH s.18
Actus reus
Causing unlawful wounding and GBH
Wounding and GBH s.18
Mens rea
Intention to cause serious GBH or intention to resist arrest
Wounding and GBH s.18
What sentence does this crime hold
Maximum life sentence
Wounding and GBH s.18
What type of offence is s.18
Triable-either-way
Wounding and GBH s.18
Case that illustrates s.18
R v Nedrick
Wounding and GBH s.18
Facts of R v Nedrick
D had a grudge against this women, he poured petrol through her letter box and lit it on fire. Caused a child to die
Wounding and GBH s.18
Held in R v Nedrick
D found guilty of murder but appealed on a misdirection of the jury
- appeal was allowed
Wounding and GBH s.18
Point of law in R v Nedrick
Jury not allowed to infer intention unless death of serious bodily harm was a certainty of D’s action and D knew it