24 - Private Company Basics Flashcards
There are three reasons for valuing the total capital and/or equity capital of private companies
transactions, compliance, and litigation.
Transaction-Related Valuations
Venture capital financing
Initial public offering (IPO)
Sale in an acquisition
Bankruptcy proceedings
Performance-based managerial compensation
Compliance-Related Valuations
Financial reporting
Tax purposes
Litigation-Related Valuations
shareholder suits, damage claims, lost profits claims, or divorce settlements.
approaches to private company valuation
income approach, the market approach, and the asset-based approach.
normalized earnings
should exclude nonrecurring and unusual items. In the case of private firms with a concentrated control, there may be discretionary or tax-motivated expenses that need to be adjusted when calculating normalized earnings.
Example: Normalized earnings
Tim Groh is the principal shareholder, CEO, and founder of Arbutus Generators. Arbutus reports the following:
1 - Groh’s compensation of $2,500,000 is included in the firm’s selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses.
2 - Arbutus leases a warehouse for $100,000 a year from one of its largest suppliers.
3 - Arbutus owns a vacant office building with reported SG&A expenses of $150,000 and $25,000 of depreciation expense.
4 - Arbutus’s capital structure has too little leverage.
An analyst determines that a market-based compensation figure for Groh’s position is $1,000,000 and that the office building is not needed for core operations. The market lease rate of the warehouse is $130,000.
Based on 1–4 above, what adjustments should the analyst make to Arbutus’s reported income to estimate normalized earnings (earnings), assuming the firm will be acquired?
Answer:
1- Because the market rate is $1,500,000 less, SG&A expenses should be reduced by $1,500,000 to reflect a normalized compensation expense.
2 - Because the market lease rate is $30,000 higher than reported, SG&A expenses should be increased by $30,000 to reflect a normalized lease rate.
3 - Because the office building is non-core, SG&A expenses should be reduced by $150,000, and depreciation expense should be reduced by $25,000.
4 - Because the capital structure is non-optimal, the analyst will drop interest expense from the calculation of operating income under the assumption that the capital structure will be changed if the firm is acquired. As we will see, interest expense is added back when calculating free cash flow to the firm.
In a strategic transaction
valuation of the firm is based in part on the perceived synergies with the acquirer’s other assets
A financial transaction
assumes no synergies, as when one firm buys another in a dissimilar industry.
Forms of the Income Approach to Valuation
free cash flow, capitalized cash flow, and/or excess earnings methods.
The Free Cash Flow Method
Once free cash flows have been estimated as we have done previously, they are discounted by a rate that reflects their risk.
Valuing the firm as a whole using the Capitalized Cash Flow Method
Valuing the equity as a whole using the Capitalized Cash Flow Method
The Excess Earnings Method
Excess earnings are firm earnings minus the earnings required to provide the required rate of return on working capital and fixed assets
Example: Calculating firm value using the excess earnings method
Given the following figures, calculate the value of the firm using the EEM.
Step 1:
Calculate the required return for working capital and fixed assets.
Based on the required rates of return for working capital and fixed assets, the required earnings are:
working capital: $300,000 × 6% = $18,000
fixed assets: $1,000,000 × 10% = $100,000
Step 2:
Calculate the excess earnings.
excess earnings = $130,000 − $18,000 − $100,000 = $12,000
Step 3:
Value the intangible assets.
Using the formula for a growing perpetuity, the discount rate for intangible assets, and the growth rate for excess earnings:
value of intangible assets = ($12,000 × 1.05) / (0.14 − 0.05) = $140,000
Step 4:
Sum the asset values to arrive at the total firm value.
firm value = $300,000 + $1,000,000 + $140,000 = $1,440,000