23.2 Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards
What is a (Rylands v Fletcher) Offence?
A strict liability tort for the escape of dangerous things
What must someone have in the land to bring a claim of Rylands v Fletcher
Interest in the land
(Hunter v Canary Wharf)
What must the defendant be?
In Rylands v Fletcher?
The owner or occupier: “someone with sufficient control over land”
(Read v Lyons)
What are the 4 elements of (Rylands v Fletcher)
- A ‘thing’ accumulates or is brought onto the D’s land.
- The ‘thing’ is likely to cause damage if it escapes.
- Storage of ‘thing’ is an unnatural use of the land.
- The ‘thing’ escapes and causes foreseeable damage
First element of (Rylands v Fletcher)
A thing accumulates or is brought onto the D’s land.
The natural growth of things e.g. weeds does not qualify for Rylands v Fletcher: (Giles v Walker)
Second element of (Rylands v Fletcher)
The ‘thing’ is likely to cause damage if it escapes
- The escape does not have to be foreseeable, just the damage.
- Gases are likely to (Batchellor v Turnbridge)
-poisonous fumes - tree branches
Third element of (Rylands v Fletcher)
Storage of the ‘thing’ amounts to an unnatural use of the land
(Transco PLC v Stockport)
- Extraordinary or unusual use.
- Storage of domestic goods is cool
- Storage of potentially hazardous is a no no
Fourth element of (Rylands v Fletcher)
The ‘thing’ escapes and causes foreseeable damage.
(Crown River v Kimbolton)
- Escape can be accidental or intentional.
What defences are there to (Rylands v Fletcher)?
- Act of God (Nichols v Marsland)
- Volenti
- Contributory Negligence
- Statutory authority
Remedy for (Rylands v Fletcher)
Damages