2.2 - The Comparative Powers of the House of Commons and the House of Lords Flashcards
Exclusive powers of the House of Commons (5)
- Examination and approval of the financial affairs of the gov
- Complete veto of legislation in certain scenarios
- Dismissal of a gov through a vote of no confidence (EG Callaghan in 1979 by one vote)
- Select committee examination of the work of gov departments
- Final approval for amendments to legislation
Exclusive powers of the House of Lords (2)
- Examining secondary legislation and making recommendations for further consideration
- Delaying primary legislation for up to one year
Shared powers of both chambers (5)
- Debating legislation and voting on legislative proposals
- Proposing amendments to legislation
- Holding gov and individual ministers to account
- Debating key issues of the day
- Private members may introduce their own legislation
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 - What did the Parliament Act 1911 do?
- Powers of the Lords severely limited by the 1911 and 1949 Parliament Acts
- 1911 Act saw the Lords power to veto legislation removed and the Lords only able to delay primary legislation for two years
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 - What did the Parliament Act 1949 do?
- 1949 Act saw this delaying period reduced to one year
- Now if the Lords delays legislation for more than one year, the Commons can simply bypass it EG Hunting Act 2004
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - Financial privilege
- As a result of the P Acts, the Lords lost its power to delay or amend money bills
- Linked to the idea of democracy in that the Lords are not accountable to the taxpayer and should therefore not be able to affect money bills
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - Confidence and supply - What is confidence and supply?
- The right to remove the gov and to grant or withhold funding
- Supply side = willingness of the Commons to authorise the govs financial plans
- Confidence side = the Commons faith in gov to get things done
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - Confidence and supply - What does confidence and supply lead to and EG?
- Usually this leads to a majority of MPs supporting gov through the party system, but can lead to smaller parties being needed in confidence and supply agreements
- EG Theresa May in 2017 and the DUP where, in exchange for the 10 DUP MPs supporting key gov bills, the gov would provide £1 billion of spending to the NI Assembly and support key DUP issues such as guaranteeing fixed pension rates
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - Confidence and supply - What happens if a gov doesn’t pass a budget or loses a vote of no confidence?
- If a gov doesn’t pass a budget or is voted out through a vote of no confidence, all members must resign from gov
- Pre 2011 this would automatically lead to a general election
Debates around the relative power of the Commons and the Lords - Confidence and supply - Examples of govs losing or nearly losing votes of no confidence
- Callaghan losing a VoNC in 1979 to force the 1979 general
- Under the FTP Act 2011, the Commons were given 14 days to form a new gov before an election was triggered – closest we came under these rules was May surviving a vote of no confidence in 2019 – FTP Act has since been repealed
- However, in 2022 Boris Johnson suffered a vote of no confidence which led to him being forced to resign from gov – instead of this triggering a general election this instead triggered a Con leadership race which ultimately saw Liz Truss ascend to PM with no mandate and a chaotic rule for just 45 days – she then resigned which led to another Tory leadership election which Sunak won unopposed
Debates around the relative powers of the Commons and the Lords - The reasonable time convention - What is the reasonable time convention and why did it come about?
- Concern that the Lords would abuse their powers of delay led to the emergence of the reasonable time convention
- This is where the Lords should consider gov legislation and vote on proposals by the end of the Parliamentary session – vague but limits Lords scrutinising abilities
Debates around the relative powers of the Commons and the Lords - The reasonable time convention - What has happened since 1999?
Since 1999 the Lords has acquired more legitimacy and has therefore been more willing to challenge the Commons – esp since the issue of clear Party mandates was not very clear post 2010 – the Lords is overall free from the party control that the Commons is subject to and can therefore be effective in scrutinising the lower chamber