2.1.5 Individual Diff in Memory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define ‘Individual differences’

A

Differences in characteristics between different people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Give an example of an individual difference in cognitive psychology.

A

Someone having a different schema due to the different experiences they’ve had in life creating the framework for an idea of what situations will be like.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How can chunking expand the capacity of STM?

A

Chunking similar information into groups increases the capacity of the STM as 10 may become 5 groups of 2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give evidence to support the idea of chunking.

A

P - Miller’s (1957) research supports
E - He found that when chunking phone numbers more than 7 digits long into groups it increases the likelihood of remembering the full phone number
E - Therefore showing how chunking can increase the capacity of the STM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define ‘processing speed’.

A

The rate at which information is processed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Using the Working Memory Model, explain how people may experience individual differences in their memory.

A

People with dyslexia have individual differences in their memory as they face impairment in their phonological loop which slows down the processing of words due to not being able to subvocally rehearse and so the capacity of their STM may be lower, decreasing ability to chunk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluate a strength of using the WMM as an explanation for individual differences in memory.

A

P - WMM has high credibility due to its practical application
E- Suggests those with dyslexia have impairments in their phonological loop and WM due to a lack of subvocal rehearsal, so they cant chunk information in STM which lowers the capacity of STM and makes it harder for dyslexics to process words quickly
E- S, provides application of proving support for word processing of people with dyslexia eg provide extra time for dyslexic students in exams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate a weakness of using the WMM as an explanation for individual differences in memory.

A

P - The model is too simplistic
E - It explains very little about the processes and function of the LTM
E - And so it is limited as an explanation of individual differences in memory as a whole which reduces its credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How can processing speed be affected at younger ages?

A

Due to no subvocal rehearsal under the age of 7, children below that age may have a slower processing speed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define ‘digit span’.

A

The capacity of how many items you can hold in your STM at any one time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How do the results of Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s (2012) study explain individual differences in memory?

A
  • Spanish words are longer than English words and so it would take longer to subvocally rehearse them
  • This leaves more items open to decaying sooner
    Therefore there are individual differences here as the digit span of a Spanish person will likely be lower than the average 7 of an English person
  • Alzheimer’s patients had an average digit span of 4.2 which didn’t differ from healthy ppts’ digit span of 4.4
  • Older groups performed significantly better than 5 year olds showing individual differences in memory with age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evaluate a strength of using Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s (2012) study as an explanation for individual differences in memory.

A

P - High validity
E - The 570 Spanish ppts were matched for the task due to not having any learning disabilities
E - And so there were no individual differences to affect the outcome making the study more credible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluate a weakness of using Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil’s (2012) study as an explanation for individual differences in memory.

A

P - Low task validity
E - The task of recalling digits in order with another being added each time the order is recalled correctly is not an everyday activity to do with memory
E - Findings therefore lack mundane realism and so won’t reflect individual differences in memory in real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define a ‘schema’.

A

Cognitive framework that processes + interprets info fromevents to be stored into ‘groups’ within our memory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give an example of a schema.

A

Restaurant ettiquette based off of past experiences in restaurants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How do the results of Bartlett’s (1932) War of the Ghosts study as an explanation for individual differences in memory.

A
  • Some ppts used confabulation to make sense of it (e.g. someone dying at sunset instead of sunrise)
  • Some ppts used rationalisation to make sense of it (e.g. no ghosts)
  • People’s schemas are different due to their different life experience which makes up their idea of a situation
  • Therefore different people will reconstruct different parts of the original story, showing an individual difference in memory