2.1 Democracy and political participation Flashcards
should the franchise be extended for prisoners?
yes:
- the right to vote is a human right
- there is no proof it acts as a deterrent
- removes civic responsibility and makes rehabilitation harder
no:
- those who commit a crime lose the right to say how society is run
- giving criminals the right to vote undermines principals of justice
- the threat of losing the right to vote acts as a deterrent
shold the franchise be extended to 16 year olds?
yes:
- they already have numerous rights that make voting a natural additional one
- it would increase participation and political education
- the can already vote in devolved regions
no:
- they’s just not bothered lol
- turnout from 18-25 year olds is the lowest group already
is there a participation crisis?
yes:
- there has been a general decline of electoral participation
- politics has lost its ‘shine’
- decline in party membership
- weakening of political group power
no:
- there has been a growth in pressure group membership
- the nature of participation has changed
- there has been a high turnout for referendums
- social media campaigns
- there are more parties
what are the factors determining pressure group success/failure?
success:
- insider status
- wealth
- large membership
- effective organisation
- expertise
- celebrity endorsement
failure:
- the groups alienates the public
- the goal of the group goes against popular opinion
- contradicting pressure groups
- the government can resist pressure from the group/contradicts government policy
do pressure groups undermine democracy?
yes:
- they are unelected causing a tyranny of the minority and may have too much influence on the government
- there are too many of them
no:
- raises awareness for topics neglected by the government
- the nature of participation has changed and pressure groups are taking over, getting more young people involved
overview of pressure groups?
- insider status with parliament is powerful for pressure groups
- sectional groups work to look after their own section in society
- outsider groups often struggle to have the same influence
overview of lobbyists and corporations
- major companies have a huge influence on the economy meaning they often influence political decisions
- that is the nature of a capitalist society but there is sometimes a concern they influence the government to the detriment of others
overview of think-tanks?
- they offer independent review of policies
- they successfully further democracy as they have no direct power only influence
- an argument could be made that we already have the civil service but there’s no harm in having more influence
are parties losing their ideological divide?
- does not seem to be the case
- labour is definitely ambiguous and undefined
- but Starmer does have policies that distinguish him from the Tories (red/green socialist)
- it is especially seen, however, through the conservatives where there is a growing right wing faction
- and the party is being moved to the right by Sunak himself
is there a decline of two party dominance?
overall: England is a two party system and the celtic fringe is a multi-party system
paragraph one:
- the rise of smaller parties
- the role of coalitions
- BUT smaller parties just act as pressure groups
- coalitions do not show a rise of smaller parties
paragraph two:
- rather the nature of FPTP means votes don’t translate
- two party dominance is seen in the outcome of general elections
paragraph three:
- the celtic fringe
- plaid cymru in wales
- the SNP in Ireland
- British parties do not stand in NI
strengths and weaknesses of AMS?
strengths
- able to form a strong government
- provides a more proportional outcome than FPTP
- better minority representation
weaknesses
- still produces one party dominance
- favours larger parties
- choice is somewhat restricted
used in the Scottish parliament, Welsh Senedd and London assemblies
strengths and weaknesses of AV?
strengths
- prevents wasted votes
- allows for the winner to have a strong government mandate due to the allocation of second preference votes to the two major parties
weaknesses
- the vote is more complicated than FPTP
- there are still wasted votes if electors cast their second preference vote for a party that is not in the top two as it does not have an effect on the results
used for the Mayor of London and other directly elected mayors
strengths and weaknesses of STV?
strengths
- STV encourages a system of power sharing
- it has much broader choice, even multiple candidates from the same party can stand in the same constituency
- delivers a proportionate outcome
negatives
- STV is very likely to result in a coalition government which may be unstable
- it has a very lengthy and complex counting process
used in Northern Ireland
does FPTP need reform?
leads to heavily disproportionate outcomes
- winners bonus (2)
- wasted votes (2)
- the need a plurality not a majority (2)
smaller parties are rising in popularity but can’t be represented effectively as concentrated votes are needed
- rise in small parties (1)
- concentrated votes (2)
BUT there is still a role for small parties
- in coalitions (3)
- as pressure groups
there is no popular demand for reform and it ensures a working majority
- majority (1)
- reform (1)
what are the social factors that impact voting behaviour?
- gender
- age
- class
- ethnicity
- geography