21 CFR 50 Flashcards
Exception from General Informed Consent Requirements
1) Human subject is confronted by a life-threatening situation necessitating the use of test articles.
2) Informed consent cannot be obtained from the subject because of an inability to communicate with, or obtain legally effective consent from the subject.
3) Time is not sufficient to obtain consent from the subject’s legal representative.
4) There is available no alternative method of approved or generally recognized therapy that provides an equal or greater likelihood of saving the life of the subject.
Timelines for exceptions to informed consent
1) the determinations of the clinical investigator shall be made, within 5 working days after the use of the article, be reviewed and evaluated in writing by a physician who is not participating in the clinical investigation.
2) the documentation required shall be submitted to the IRB within 5 working days after the use of the test article.
Informed Consent cannot:
include exculpatory language through which the subject or the representative is made to waive or appear to waive any of the subject’s legal rights, or release or appears to release the investigator, the sponsor, the institution, or its agents from liability for negligence.
Under 10 U.S.C. 1107(f)
President may waive the prior consent requirement for administration of an IND for a member of the armed forces in connection with the member’s participation in a particular military operation.
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (1)
Human subjects are in a life-threatening situation, available treatments are unproven or unsatisfactory, and the collection of valid scientific evidence, which may include evidence obtained through randomized placebo-controlled investigations is necessary to determine the safety and effectiveness of the particular intervention
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (2)
obtaining informed consent is not feasible because:
1) subjects will not be able to give IC as a result of their medical condition
2) intervention under investigation must be administered before consent from legally authorized representative is feasible
3) there is no reasonable way to identify prospectively the individuals likely to become eligible for participation in the clinical investigation
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (3)
participation in the research holds out the prospect of direct benefit to the subject because:
1) subjects are facing a life-threatening situation that necessitates intervention
2) appropriate animal and other preclinical studies have been conducted, and the information derived from those studies and related evidence support the potential for the intervention to provide a direct benefit to the individual subjects
3) risks associated with the investigation are reasonable in relation to what is known about the medical condition of the potential class of subjects, the risks and benefits of standard therapy, if any, and what is known about the risks and benefits of the proposed intervention of activity.
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (4)
the clinical investigation could not practicably be carried out without the waiver
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (5)
the proposed investigational plan defines the length of the potential therapeutic window based on scientific evidence, and the investigator has committed to attempting to contact the LAR for each subject within that window of time, if feasible, to asking the LAR contacted for consent within that window rather than proceeding without consent. The investigator will summarize efforts made to contact LAR and make this information available to the IRB at the time of continuing review.
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (6)
IRB has reviewed and approved IC procedures and an IC document. these procedures and IC document are to be used with subjects or their LAR where feasible. IRB has reviewed and approved procedures and information to be used when providing an opportunity for a family member to object to a subject’s participation in a clinical investigation.
Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research (7)
additional protections of the rights and welfare of the subjects will be provided, including:
1) consultation w/reps of the communities where clin. inv. conducted
2) public disclosure of risk/benefits to communities prior to initiation of clin. inv.
3) public disclousre of sufficient info following completion of clin. inv. like demographic characteristics of research pop & results
4) establishment of ind. data monitoring committee to exercise oversight
5) if IC not possible w/subject or LAR - investigator should try to contact family member
If IRB finds that criteria for exceptions to IC not met, how long does IRB have to keep documentation that they sent to investigator and sponsor about this?
3 years after completion of investigation
When IC not possible IRB is responsible for ensuring that procedures are in place to inform at the earliest the subject’s inclusion in the clinical investigation.
the subject, if incapacitated then LAR, if no LAR then family member. All have right to withdraw from clin. investigation at any time with no punishment.
Elements of informed consent (1)
statement that the study involves research, an explanation of the purposes of the research and the expected duration of the subject’s participation, a description of the procedures to be followed, and identification of any procedures which are experimental
Elements of informed consent (2)
a description of any reasonable and foreseeable risks or discomforts to the subject